Speaking with a “forked tongue” – misalignment between user ratings and textual emotions in LLMs

IF 2.5 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
Kybernetes Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1108/k-06-2024-1458
Yixing Yang, Jianxiong Huang
{"title":"Speaking with a “forked tongue” – misalignment between user ratings and textual emotions in LLMs","authors":"Yixing Yang, Jianxiong Huang","doi":"10.1108/k-06-2024-1458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The study aims to provide concrete service remediation and enhancement for LLM developers such as getting user forgiveness and breaking through perceived bottlenecks. It also aims to improve the efficiency of app users' usage decisions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This paper takes the user reviews of the app stores in 21 countries and 10 languages as the research data, extracts the potential factors by LDA model, exploratively takes the misalignment between user ratings and textual emotions as user forgiveness and perceived bottleneck and uses the Word2vec-SVM model to analyze the sentiment. Finally, attributions are made based on empathy.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results show that AI-based LLMs are more likely to cause bias in user ratings and textual content than regular APPs. Functional and economic remedies are effective in awakening empathy and forgiveness, while empathic remedies are effective in reducing perceived bottlenecks. Interestingly, empathetic users are “pickier”. Further social network analysis reveals that problem solving timeliness, software flexibility, model updating and special data (voice and image) analysis capabilities are beneficial in breaking perceived bottlenecks. Besides, heterogeneity analysis show that eastern users are more sensitive to the price factor and are more likely to generate forgiveness through economic remedy, and there is a dual interaction between basic attributes and extra boosts in the East and West.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The “gap” between negative (positive) user reviews and ratings, that is consumer forgiveness and perceived bottlenecks, is identified in unstructured text; the study finds that empathy helps to awaken user forgiveness and understanding, while it is limited to bottleneck breakthroughs; the dataset includes a wide range of countries and regions, findings are tested in a cross-language and cross-cultural perspective, which makes the study more robust, and the heterogeneity of users' cultural backgrounds is also analyzed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":49930,"journal":{"name":"Kybernetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kybernetes","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/k-06-2024-1458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The study aims to provide concrete service remediation and enhancement for LLM developers such as getting user forgiveness and breaking through perceived bottlenecks. It also aims to improve the efficiency of app users' usage decisions.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper takes the user reviews of the app stores in 21 countries and 10 languages as the research data, extracts the potential factors by LDA model, exploratively takes the misalignment between user ratings and textual emotions as user forgiveness and perceived bottleneck and uses the Word2vec-SVM model to analyze the sentiment. Finally, attributions are made based on empathy.

Findings

The results show that AI-based LLMs are more likely to cause bias in user ratings and textual content than regular APPs. Functional and economic remedies are effective in awakening empathy and forgiveness, while empathic remedies are effective in reducing perceived bottlenecks. Interestingly, empathetic users are “pickier”. Further social network analysis reveals that problem solving timeliness, software flexibility, model updating and special data (voice and image) analysis capabilities are beneficial in breaking perceived bottlenecks. Besides, heterogeneity analysis show that eastern users are more sensitive to the price factor and are more likely to generate forgiveness through economic remedy, and there is a dual interaction between basic attributes and extra boosts in the East and West.

Originality/value

The “gap” between negative (positive) user reviews and ratings, that is consumer forgiveness and perceived bottlenecks, is identified in unstructured text; the study finds that empathy helps to awaken user forgiveness and understanding, while it is limited to bottleneck breakthroughs; the dataset includes a wide range of countries and regions, findings are tested in a cross-language and cross-cultural perspective, which makes the study more robust, and the heterogeneity of users' cultural backgrounds is also analyzed.

用 "分叉的舌头 "说话--法律硕士的用户评价与文本情感之间的错位
目的本研究旨在为 LLM 开发人员提供具体的服务补救和提升措施,如获得用户原谅和突破感知瓶颈。本文以 21 个国家、10 种语言的应用商店的用户评论为研究数据,通过 LDA 模型提取潜在因素,探索性地将用户评分与文本情感之间的错位作为用户宽容度和感知瓶颈,并使用 Word2vec-SVM 模型进行情感分析。结果表明,与普通 APP 相比,基于人工智能的 LLM 更容易造成用户评分和文本内容的偏差。功能性和经济性补救措施能有效唤醒移情和宽恕,而移情补救措施则能有效减少感知瓶颈。有趣的是,移情用户更 "挑剔"。进一步的社会网络分析显示,解决问题的及时性、软件灵活性、模型更新和特殊数据(语音和图像)分析能力有利于打破感知瓶颈。此外,异质性分析表明,东部用户对价格因素更为敏感,更有可能通过经济补救措施获得宽恕,东西部用户的基本属性和额外提升之间存在双重互动。独创性/价值在非结构化文本中发现了用户负面(正面)评价与评分之间的 "差距",即消费者的宽恕和感知瓶颈;研究发现,同理心有助于唤醒用户的宽恕和理解,但仅限于瓶颈的突破;数据集包括广泛的国家和地区,研究结果在跨语言和跨文化的视角下进行检验,这使得研究更加稳健,同时还分析了用户文化背景的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kybernetes
Kybernetes 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.00%
发文量
237
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Kybernetes is the official journal of the UNESCO recognized World Organisation of Systems and Cybernetics (WOSC), and The Cybernetics Society. The journal is an important forum for the exchange of knowledge and information among all those who are interested in cybernetics and systems thinking. It is devoted to improvement in the understanding of human, social, organizational, technological and sustainable aspects of society and their interdependencies. It encourages consideration of a range of theories, methodologies and approaches, and their transdisciplinary links. The spirit of the journal comes from Norbert Wiener''s understanding of cybernetics as "The Human Use of Human Beings." Hence, Kybernetes strives for examination and analysis, based on a systemic frame of reference, of burning issues of ecosystems, society, organizations, businesses and human behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信