Effect of jigsaw‐integrated task‐driven learning on students' motivation, computational thinking, collaborative skills, and programming performance in a high‐school programming course

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Zehui Zhan, Tingting Li, Yaner Ye
{"title":"Effect of jigsaw‐integrated task‐driven learning on students' motivation, computational thinking, collaborative skills, and programming performance in a high‐school programming course","authors":"Zehui Zhan, Tingting Li, Yaner Ye","doi":"10.1002/cae.22793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computer programming has emerged as an important field in K‐12 science, technology, engineering, and maths (STEM) education in the AI era. However, contemporary programming education is hindered by fragmented course content, high complexity, and difficulties in maintaining engagement, impeding smooth progress. More effective collaborative learning strategies need to be explored. This study constructed jigsaw‐integrated task‐driven learning (jigsaw‐TDL) in a high school Python programming course under a STEM curriculum and verified its teaching effectiveness on students’ learning motivation, computational thinking, collaborative skills, and programming performance both quantitatively and qualitatively. Nighty‐nine high school students were randomly assigned to a jigsaw‐TDL group and a general collaborative task‐driven learning group (collaborative‐TDL). During the experiment, a Python programming course was introduced over 7 weeks. Questionnaires, programming tasks, and semistructured interviews were comprehensively applied to examine students’ learning outcomes. Finally, the jigsaw‐TDL group showed significantly better performance than the collaborative‐TDL group in learning motivation, computational thinking, and collaborative skills. However, it only led to better programming performance in the less complex tasks. The majority of students held a positive attitude toward the jigsaw‐TDL model, acknowledging its benefits in group collaboration, programming knowledge acquisition, and application. This research provides empirical evidence and potential guidance for task organization and collaborative learning support in programming courses and STEM education.","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computer programming has emerged as an important field in K‐12 science, technology, engineering, and maths (STEM) education in the AI era. However, contemporary programming education is hindered by fragmented course content, high complexity, and difficulties in maintaining engagement, impeding smooth progress. More effective collaborative learning strategies need to be explored. This study constructed jigsaw‐integrated task‐driven learning (jigsaw‐TDL) in a high school Python programming course under a STEM curriculum and verified its teaching effectiveness on students’ learning motivation, computational thinking, collaborative skills, and programming performance both quantitatively and qualitatively. Nighty‐nine high school students were randomly assigned to a jigsaw‐TDL group and a general collaborative task‐driven learning group (collaborative‐TDL). During the experiment, a Python programming course was introduced over 7 weeks. Questionnaires, programming tasks, and semistructured interviews were comprehensively applied to examine students’ learning outcomes. Finally, the jigsaw‐TDL group showed significantly better performance than the collaborative‐TDL group in learning motivation, computational thinking, and collaborative skills. However, it only led to better programming performance in the less complex tasks. The majority of students held a positive attitude toward the jigsaw‐TDL model, acknowledging its benefits in group collaboration, programming knowledge acquisition, and application. This research provides empirical evidence and potential guidance for task organization and collaborative learning support in programming courses and STEM education.
拼图式任务驱动学习对高中程序设计课程中学生学习动机、计算思维、协作技能和编程成绩的影响
在人工智能时代,计算机编程已成为 K-12 科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育的一个重要领域。然而,当代的编程教育却因课程内容零散、复杂度高、难以保持参与度等问题而阻碍了教学的顺利进行。需要探索更有效的协作学习策略。本研究在STEM课程下的高中Python编程课程中构建了拼图式任务驱动学习(jigsaw-TDL),并从定量和定性两个方面验证了其对学生学习动机、计算思维、协作技能和编程成绩的教学效果。九名高中生被随机分配到拼图-TDL 组和一般协作任务驱动学习组(协作-TDL)。在实验期间,学生们学习了为期 7 周的 Python 编程课程。综合运用问卷调查、编程任务和半结构式访谈来考察学生的学习成果。最后,拼图-TDL 组在学习动机、计算思维和协作技能方面的表现明显优于协作-TDL 组。然而,拼图-TDL 组仅在复杂度较低的任务中取得了更好的编程成绩。大多数学生对拼图-TDL 模式持积极态度,承认其在小组协作、编程知识学习和应用方面的优势。这项研究为编程课程和 STEM 教育中的任务组织和协作学习支持提供了经验证据和潜在指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Computer Applications in Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信