Comparison of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), soluble E-cadherin (sE-cad), and inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase-2 (IMPDH-2) as aggressive prostate cancer predictors

IF 0.5 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ahmed Mohammed Umar, Ismaila Arzika Mungadi, Ngwobia Peter Agwu, Abdullah Abdulwahab-Ahmed, Abubakar Sadiq Muhammad, Abdullahi Khalid
{"title":"Comparison of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), soluble E-cadherin (sE-cad), and inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase-2 (IMPDH-2) as aggressive prostate cancer predictors","authors":"Ahmed Mohammed Umar, Ismaila Arzika Mungadi, Ngwobia Peter Agwu, Abdullah Abdulwahab-Ahmed, Abubakar Sadiq Muhammad, Abdullahi Khalid","doi":"10.1186/s12301-024-00441-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to compare serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), Soluble E-cadherin (sE-cad), and Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase-2 in predicting prostate cancer aggressiveness by determining their correlations with Gleason score and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Groups. This was a hospital-based descriptive quantitative cross-sectional study whereby we enrolled 48 newly diagnosed prostate adenocarcinoma patients in the study. Their serum was analysed for PSA, sE-cad, and IMPDH-2. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to test the correlation between the serum sE-cad and Gleason score while Spearman rho correlation coefficient was used for PSA and IMPDH-2. The correlation coefficient (r) was graded as very weak (< 0.3), weak (0.3–0.4), moderate (0.5–0.6), or strong (≥ 0.7), while the magnitude was determined by calculating the coefficient of determination for the respective analysis (R2). The correlation between the biomarkers and the ISUP Grade groups was determined using the Kendall tau correlation coefficient (τ). All levels of statistical significance were set at p < 0.05. The mean age of the subjects was 69.4 years. The Means of serum PSA, sE-cad, and IMPDH-2 were 47.2 ng/ml, 136.5 ng/ml, and 89.8 pg/ml respectively. Serum PSA weakly correlated with both Gleason score (r = 0.3, p = 0.04) and ISUP grade groups (τ = 0.3, p = 0.02). The magnitude was 0.097. Similarly, serum sE-cad correlated weakly with both Gleason scores (r = 0.4, p = 0.01), and ISUP Grade Groups (τ = 0.3, p = 0.005). The magnitude was 0.134. However, serum IMPDH-2 neither correlated with Gleason score (r = 0.03, p = 0.86) nor ISUP Grade Groups (τ = 0.004, p = 0.97). Serum sE-cad did not outperform both IMPDH-2 (p = 0.91) or PSA (p = 0.23) in predicting the Gleason score. Serum sE-cad best predicted aggressive prostate cancer but did not statistically outperform serum PSA or IMPDH-2. Hence, neither of the three are reliable predictors of aggressive prostate cancer.","PeriodicalId":7432,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00441-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), Soluble E-cadherin (sE-cad), and Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase-2 in predicting prostate cancer aggressiveness by determining their correlations with Gleason score and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Groups. This was a hospital-based descriptive quantitative cross-sectional study whereby we enrolled 48 newly diagnosed prostate adenocarcinoma patients in the study. Their serum was analysed for PSA, sE-cad, and IMPDH-2. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to test the correlation between the serum sE-cad and Gleason score while Spearman rho correlation coefficient was used for PSA and IMPDH-2. The correlation coefficient (r) was graded as very weak (< 0.3), weak (0.3–0.4), moderate (0.5–0.6), or strong (≥ 0.7), while the magnitude was determined by calculating the coefficient of determination for the respective analysis (R2). The correlation between the biomarkers and the ISUP Grade groups was determined using the Kendall tau correlation coefficient (τ). All levels of statistical significance were set at p < 0.05. The mean age of the subjects was 69.4 years. The Means of serum PSA, sE-cad, and IMPDH-2 were 47.2 ng/ml, 136.5 ng/ml, and 89.8 pg/ml respectively. Serum PSA weakly correlated with both Gleason score (r = 0.3, p = 0.04) and ISUP grade groups (τ = 0.3, p = 0.02). The magnitude was 0.097. Similarly, serum sE-cad correlated weakly with both Gleason scores (r = 0.4, p = 0.01), and ISUP Grade Groups (τ = 0.3, p = 0.005). The magnitude was 0.134. However, serum IMPDH-2 neither correlated with Gleason score (r = 0.03, p = 0.86) nor ISUP Grade Groups (τ = 0.004, p = 0.97). Serum sE-cad did not outperform both IMPDH-2 (p = 0.91) or PSA (p = 0.23) in predicting the Gleason score. Serum sE-cad best predicted aggressive prostate cancer but did not statistically outperform serum PSA or IMPDH-2. Hence, neither of the three are reliable predictors of aggressive prostate cancer.
比较血清前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA)、可溶性 E-cadherin (sE-cad) 和单磷酸肌苷脱氢酶-2 (IMPDH-2) 作为侵袭性前列腺癌预测指标的作用
本研究旨在通过确定血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、可溶性E-cadherin(sE-cad)和单磷酸肌苷脱氢酶-2与格里森评分和国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)分级组的相关性,比较它们在预测前列腺癌侵袭性方面的作用。这是一项以医院为基础的描述性定量横断面研究,我们招募了 48 名新确诊的前列腺腺癌患者参与研究。我们对他们的血清进行了 PSA、sE-cad 和 IMPDH-2 分析。皮尔逊相关系数用于检验血清 sE-cad 与格里森评分之间的相关性,而 Spearman rho 相关系数用于检验 PSA 和 IMPDH-2 之间的相关性。相关系数(r)分为极弱(< 0.3)、弱(0.3-0.4)、中等(0.5-0.6)或强(≥ 0.7),而相关程度则通过计算相应分析的决定系数(R2)来确定。生物标志物与 ISUP 等级组之间的相关性使用 Kendall tau 相关系数 (τ) 确定。所有统计显著性水平均设定为 p <0.05。受试者的平均年龄为 69.4 岁。血清 PSA、sE-cad 和 IMPDH-2 的平均值分别为 47.2 纳克/毫升、136.5 纳克/毫升和 89.8 皮克/毫升。血清 PSA 与 Gleason 评分(r = 0.3,p = 0.04)和 ISUP 等级组(τ = 0.3,p = 0.02)均呈弱相关。大小为 0.097。同样,血清 sE-cad 与 Gleason 评分(r = 0.4,p = 0.01)和 ISUP 等级组(τ = 0.3,p = 0.005)均呈弱相关。幅度为 0.134。然而,血清 IMPDH-2 与 Gleason 评分(r = 0.03,p = 0.86)和 ISUP 等级组(τ = 0.004,p = 0.97)均无相关性。血清sE-cad在预测Gleason评分方面并不优于IMPDH-2(p = 0.91)或PSA(p = 0.23)。血清 sE-cad 最能预测侵袭性前列腺癌,但在统计学上并不优于血清 PSA 或 IMPDH-2。因此,这三者都不是侵袭性前列腺癌的可靠预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Urology
African Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信