Correlation between anogenital distance and severity of hypospadias in male children

IF 0.5 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
S. E. Omebe, A. O. Ademuyiwa, O. A. Elebute, A. A. Obasi, A. O. Ulebe, E. N. Afogu, S. O. Ekenze
{"title":"Correlation between anogenital distance and severity of hypospadias in male children","authors":"S. E. Omebe, A. O. Ademuyiwa, O. A. Elebute, A. A. Obasi, A. O. Ulebe, E. N. Afogu, S. O. Ekenze","doi":"10.1186/s12301-024-00447-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies have shown an association between anogenital distance (AGD) and types of hypospadias. This study aims to determine whether AGD can be used to predict the severity of hypospadias in male children. We used a cross-sectional study design to evaluate (43) children with hypospadias. The severity of hypospadias based on the meatal position before surgery was classified using the meatal score of the glans-urethral meatal-shaft (GMS) classification into four groups of M1–M4. Three AGD parameters viz: ano-scrotal distance (ASD), the ano-penal distance 1 (APD1) and the ano-penal distance 2 (APD2) were measured using a digital calliper. The glanulomeatal distance 1 (GMD1) before and the glanulomeatal distance 2 (GMD2) after chordee correction were calculated for any change in the position of the meatus. Data were collected over 18 months and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS) version 25 software. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The mean ano-scrotal distance (ASD), ano-penile distance 1 (APD1) and ano-penile distance 2 (APD2) were 35.0 ± 7.11 mm, 66.0 ± 13.0 mm and 82.05 ± 14.0 mm, respectively. The parameters of AGD and AGD index progressively decreased with increasing meatal score but these decreases were not statistically significant across the four categories of meatal score. Statistically significant, moderately negative correlations were observed between GMD2 and mean ASD (R = − 0.394, P ≤ 0.009), APD1 (R = − 0.308, P ≤ 0.045) and APD2 (R = − 0.391, P ≤ 0.010). There were also statistically significant predictive relationships between GMD2 (intra-operative meatal position) with ASD (R2 = 0.155, P ≤ 0.009), APD1 (R2 = 0.095, P ≤ 0.045) and APD2 (R2 = 0.153, P ≤ 0.010). The study demonstrated a significant relationship between the AGD and meatal position. Therefore, AGD may be used to predict the intra-operative meatal position and hence, the severity of hypospadias before surgery.","PeriodicalId":7432,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Urology","volume":"149 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00447-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have shown an association between anogenital distance (AGD) and types of hypospadias. This study aims to determine whether AGD can be used to predict the severity of hypospadias in male children. We used a cross-sectional study design to evaluate (43) children with hypospadias. The severity of hypospadias based on the meatal position before surgery was classified using the meatal score of the glans-urethral meatal-shaft (GMS) classification into four groups of M1–M4. Three AGD parameters viz: ano-scrotal distance (ASD), the ano-penal distance 1 (APD1) and the ano-penal distance 2 (APD2) were measured using a digital calliper. The glanulomeatal distance 1 (GMD1) before and the glanulomeatal distance 2 (GMD2) after chordee correction were calculated for any change in the position of the meatus. Data were collected over 18 months and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS) version 25 software. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The mean ano-scrotal distance (ASD), ano-penile distance 1 (APD1) and ano-penile distance 2 (APD2) were 35.0 ± 7.11 mm, 66.0 ± 13.0 mm and 82.05 ± 14.0 mm, respectively. The parameters of AGD and AGD index progressively decreased with increasing meatal score but these decreases were not statistically significant across the four categories of meatal score. Statistically significant, moderately negative correlations were observed between GMD2 and mean ASD (R = − 0.394, P ≤ 0.009), APD1 (R = − 0.308, P ≤ 0.045) and APD2 (R = − 0.391, P ≤ 0.010). There were also statistically significant predictive relationships between GMD2 (intra-operative meatal position) with ASD (R2 = 0.155, P ≤ 0.009), APD1 (R2 = 0.095, P ≤ 0.045) and APD2 (R2 = 0.153, P ≤ 0.010). The study demonstrated a significant relationship between the AGD and meatal position. Therefore, AGD may be used to predict the intra-operative meatal position and hence, the severity of hypospadias before surgery.
男童生殖器距离与尿道下裂严重程度的相关性
以往的研究表明,肛门距离(AGD)与尿道下裂的类型有关。本研究旨在确定 AGD 是否可用于预测男性尿道下裂的严重程度。我们采用横断面研究设计对(43 名)尿道下裂患儿进行了评估。根据手术前的肉阜位置,尿道下裂的严重程度被分为 M1-M4 四组。使用数字卡尺测量了三个 AGD 参数,即阴囊口距离 (ASD)、阴茎口距离 1 (APD1) 和阴茎口距离 2 (APD2)。根据阴道口位置的任何变化,计算弦切校正前的阴道口距离1(GMD1)和弦切校正后的阴道口距离2(GMD2)。数据收集历时18个月,并使用社会科学统计软件包(IBM SPSS)第25版软件进行分析。P 值小于 0.05 视为具有统计学意义。阴囊前距(ASD)、阴茎前距1(APD1)和阴茎前距2(APD2)的平均值分别为(35.0 ± 7.11)毫米、(66.0 ± 13.0)毫米和(82.05 ± 14.0)毫米。随着肉眼评分的增加,AGD参数和AGD指数逐渐下降,但在四个肉眼评分类别中,这些下降并无统计学意义。GMD2与平均ASD(R = - 0.394,P ≤ 0.009)、APD1(R = - 0.308,P ≤ 0.045)和APD2(R = - 0.391,P ≤ 0.010)之间存在统计学意义上的中度负相关。GMD2(术中肉腔位置)与 ASD(R2 = 0.155,P ≤ 0.009)、APD1(R2 = 0.095,P ≤ 0.045)和 APD2(R2 = 0.153,P ≤ 0.010)之间也存在统计学意义上的预测关系。研究表明,AGD 与肉腔位置之间存在明显关系。因此,AGD 可用来预测术中的肉阜位置,从而在术前预测尿道下裂的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Urology
African Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信