Continuous Versus Intermittent Vancomycin Infusions for Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus Bacteremia in Neonates: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS) are a major cause of late-onset neonatal sepsis, particularly in preterm infants, with high morbidity and mortality. While vancomycin is the first-line treatment for these infections, the optimal administration in neonates remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE We aim to compare the outcomes of neonates with CONS bacteremia treated with adjusted continuous infusion (CIV) versus standard intermittent infusion (IIV) of vancomycin. METHODS This retrospective study included 110 neonates, with 29 in the CIV group and 47 in the IIV group after propensity score matching. The primary outcome was treatment failure defined by the persistence of a positive blood culture for the same organism after at least 48 hours of vancomycin treatment. RESULTS After matching, the CIV group exhibited significantly lower treatment failure rates [5/29 (17%) vs. 26/47 (44%); P = 0.014] and a higher rate of achieving therapeutic vancomycin levels after 24 hours [20/29 (69%) vs. 26/47 (44%); P = 0.002] compared to the IIV group. No significant differences were observed in terms of acute kidney failure between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION Adjusted continuous vancomycin infusion in neonates with CONS bacteremia is associated with a lower treatment failure rate without an increase in renal toxicity compared to standard intermittent infusion. However, due to the observational design, larger prospective studies are needed to validate these results.