Development and calibration of a mathematical model of HIV outcomes among Rwandan adults: informing equitable achievement of targets in Rwanda

April Kimmel, Zhongzhe Pan, Ellen Brazier, Gad Murenzi, Benjamin Muhoza, Marcel Yotebieng, Kathryn Anastos, Denis Nash, Central Africa International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (CA-IeDEA)
{"title":"Development and calibration of a mathematical model of HIV outcomes among Rwandan adults: informing equitable achievement of targets in Rwanda","authors":"April Kimmel, Zhongzhe Pan, Ellen Brazier, Gad Murenzi, Benjamin Muhoza, Marcel Yotebieng, Kathryn Anastos, Denis Nash, Central Africa International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (CA-IeDEA)","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.06.24313223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We developed and calibrated the Central Africa-International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (CA-IeDEA) HIV policy model to inform equitable achievement of global goals, overall and across sub-populations, in Rwanda.\nMethods: We created a deterministic dynamic model to project adult HIV epidemic and care continuum outcomes, overall and for 25 subpopulations (age group, sex, HIV acquisition risk, urbanicity). Data came from the Rwanda cohort of CA-IeDEA, 2004–2020; Rwanda Demographic and Health Surveys, 2005, 2010, 2015; Rwanda Population-based HIV Impact Assessment, 2019; and the literature and reports. We calibrated the model to 47 targets by selecting the 50 best-fitting parameter sets among 20,000 simulations. Calibration targets reflected epidemic (HIV prevalence, incidence), global goals (percentage on antiretroviral therapy (ART) among diagnosed, percentage virally suppressed among on ART) and other (number on ART, percentage virally suppressed) indicators, overall and by sex. Best-fitting sets minimized the summed absolute value of the percentage deviation (AVPD) between model projections and calibration targets. Good model performance was mean AVPD <5% across the 50 best-fitting sets and/or projections within the target confidence intervals; acceptable was mean AVPD >5% and <15%. Results: Across indicators, 1,841 of 2,350 (78.3%) model projections were a good or acceptable fit to calibration targets. For HIV epidemic indicators, 256 of 300 (85.3%) projections were a good fit to targets, with the model performing better for women (83.3% a good fit) than for men (71.7% a good fit). For global goals indicators, 96 of 100 (96.0%) projections were a good fit; model performance was similar for women and men. For other indicators, 653 of 950 (68.7%) projections were a good or acceptable fit. Fit was better for women than for men (percentage virally suppressed only) and when restricting targets for number on ART to 2013 and beyond.\nConclusions: The CA-IeDEA HIV policy model fits historical data and can inform policy solutions for equitably achieving global goals to end the HIV epidemic in Rwanda. High-quality, unbiased population-based data, as well as novel approaches that account for calibration target quality, are critical to ongoing use of mathematical models for programmatic planning.","PeriodicalId":501276,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.06.24313223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We developed and calibrated the Central Africa-International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (CA-IeDEA) HIV policy model to inform equitable achievement of global goals, overall and across sub-populations, in Rwanda. Methods: We created a deterministic dynamic model to project adult HIV epidemic and care continuum outcomes, overall and for 25 subpopulations (age group, sex, HIV acquisition risk, urbanicity). Data came from the Rwanda cohort of CA-IeDEA, 2004–2020; Rwanda Demographic and Health Surveys, 2005, 2010, 2015; Rwanda Population-based HIV Impact Assessment, 2019; and the literature and reports. We calibrated the model to 47 targets by selecting the 50 best-fitting parameter sets among 20,000 simulations. Calibration targets reflected epidemic (HIV prevalence, incidence), global goals (percentage on antiretroviral therapy (ART) among diagnosed, percentage virally suppressed among on ART) and other (number on ART, percentage virally suppressed) indicators, overall and by sex. Best-fitting sets minimized the summed absolute value of the percentage deviation (AVPD) between model projections and calibration targets. Good model performance was mean AVPD <5% across the 50 best-fitting sets and/or projections within the target confidence intervals; acceptable was mean AVPD >5% and <15%. Results: Across indicators, 1,841 of 2,350 (78.3%) model projections were a good or acceptable fit to calibration targets. For HIV epidemic indicators, 256 of 300 (85.3%) projections were a good fit to targets, with the model performing better for women (83.3% a good fit) than for men (71.7% a good fit). For global goals indicators, 96 of 100 (96.0%) projections were a good fit; model performance was similar for women and men. For other indicators, 653 of 950 (68.7%) projections were a good or acceptable fit. Fit was better for women than for men (percentage virally suppressed only) and when restricting targets for number on ART to 2013 and beyond. Conclusions: The CA-IeDEA HIV policy model fits historical data and can inform policy solutions for equitably achieving global goals to end the HIV epidemic in Rwanda. High-quality, unbiased population-based data, as well as novel approaches that account for calibration target quality, are critical to ongoing use of mathematical models for programmatic planning.
开发和校准卢旺达成年人艾滋病毒结果数学模型:为在卢旺达公平实现目标提供信息
背景:我们开发并校准了中非-国际艾滋病流行病学评估数据库(CA-IeDEA)艾滋病政策模型,以便为在卢旺达公平实现总体目标和不同亚人群的全球目标提供信息:我们创建了一个确定性动态模型,以预测成人艾滋病疫情和护理过程的总体结果以及 25 个亚人群(年龄组、性别、艾滋病感染风险、城市化程度)的结果。数据来源于 2004-2020 年 CA-IeDEA 卢旺达队列;2005、2010、2015 年卢旺达人口与健康调查;2019 年卢旺达基于人口的 HIV 影响评估;以及文献和报告。我们在 20,000 次模拟中选择了 50 个最佳拟合参数集,根据 47 个目标对模型进行了校准。校准目标反映了流行病(艾滋病毒流行率、发病率)、全球目标(确诊者中接受抗逆转录病毒疗法的百分比、接受抗逆转录病毒疗法者中病毒得到抑制的百分比)和其他指标(接受抗逆转录病毒疗法的人数、病毒得到抑制的百分比)的总体情况和性别情况。最佳拟合集将模型预测与校准目标之间的百分比偏差绝对值总和(AVPD)最小化。良好的模型性能是指 50 个最佳拟合集的平均 AVPD <5% 和/或预测值在目标置信区间内;可接受的是平均 AVPD >5% 和 <15%。结果:在所有指标中,2,350 个模型预测中有 1,841 个(78.3%)与校准目标拟合良好或可接受。在艾滋病毒流行指标方面,300 个预测指标中有 256 个(85.3%)与目标拟合良好,其中女性(83.3%拟合良好)的模型表现优于男性(71.7%拟合良好)。就全球目标指标而言,100 项预测中有 96 项(96.0%)拟合良好;模型对女性和男性的表现相似。对于其他指标,950 项预测中有 653 项(68.7%)拟合良好或可接受。在将接受抗逆转录病毒疗法的人数目标限制在 2013 年及以后时,女性的拟合效果优于男性(仅病毒抑制百分比):CA-IeDEA HIV 政策模型符合历史数据,可为政策解决方案提供信息,以公平地实现全球目标,终结卢旺达的 HIV 流行。高质量、无偏见的人口数据,以及考虑校准目标质量的新方法,对于持续使用数学模型进行计划规划至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信