Isabel Meciar, Coral E Gartner, Ariel McLay, Cheneal Puljevic
{"title":"The impact of tobacco control policies on illicit tobacco trade: A scoping review","authors":"Isabel Meciar, Coral E Gartner, Ariel McLay, Cheneal Puljevic","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.09.24313359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There are concerns that progressively stringent tobacco control policies will result in increased illicit tobacco trade (ITT). We reviewed the international evidence base to identify studies examining the impact of tobacco control polices on ITT.\nMethods: Guided by JBI scoping review methodology, we searched six databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science) in 2022 and 2024 for original research published in English since 2000. One reviewer screened titles and abstracts, and two reviewers screened full-text articles against inclusion criteria. We report the results according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist.\nResults: We identified 60 articles examining the impact of eight tobacco control policies or combination of policies on the ITT, including tobacco tax increases or decreases (n=43); menthol bans (n=5); decreasing allowable cigarette filter ventilation levels (n=1); standardised packaging (n=5); tobacco sales bans (n=1); a substantial reduction in the number of tobacco retailers (n=1); a very low nicotine content mandate (VLNC; n=2); and multicomponent policy interventions (n=4).\nConclusions: The available evidence is predominantly focused on the impact of tobacco tax increases on the ITT, with equal numbers of studies describing an increase in the ITT or no impact on the ITT, countering claims that tobacco tax increases are the primary driver of increased ITT. Evidence on the impact of other tobacco control policies on the ITT is limited. Collaborative efforts to develop accurate and consistent methods to assess the ITT are needed.","PeriodicalId":501276,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.24313359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: There are concerns that progressively stringent tobacco control policies will result in increased illicit tobacco trade (ITT). We reviewed the international evidence base to identify studies examining the impact of tobacco control polices on ITT.
Methods: Guided by JBI scoping review methodology, we searched six databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science) in 2022 and 2024 for original research published in English since 2000. One reviewer screened titles and abstracts, and two reviewers screened full-text articles against inclusion criteria. We report the results according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist.
Results: We identified 60 articles examining the impact of eight tobacco control policies or combination of policies on the ITT, including tobacco tax increases or decreases (n=43); menthol bans (n=5); decreasing allowable cigarette filter ventilation levels (n=1); standardised packaging (n=5); tobacco sales bans (n=1); a substantial reduction in the number of tobacco retailers (n=1); a very low nicotine content mandate (VLNC; n=2); and multicomponent policy interventions (n=4).
Conclusions: The available evidence is predominantly focused on the impact of tobacco tax increases on the ITT, with equal numbers of studies describing an increase in the ITT or no impact on the ITT, countering claims that tobacco tax increases are the primary driver of increased ITT. Evidence on the impact of other tobacco control policies on the ITT is limited. Collaborative efforts to develop accurate and consistent methods to assess the ITT are needed.
导言:有人担心逐步严格的烟草控制政策会导致非法烟草贸易(ITT)的增加。我们对国际证据库进行了审查,以确定有关烟草控制政策对 ITT 影响的研究:在 JBI 范围综述方法的指导下,我们在 2022 年和 2024 年检索了六个数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Scopus 和 Web of Science)中自 2000 年以来用英语发表的原创研究。一位审稿人筛选了标题和摘要,两位审稿人根据纳入标准筛选了全文。我们根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目扩展范围综述核对表》报告结果:我们发现了60篇文章,研究了8种烟草控制政策或政策组合对ITT的影响,包括烟草税的增加或减少(43篇);薄荷醇禁令(5篇);降低卷烟过滤嘴允许通风量(1篇);标准化包装(5篇);烟草销售禁令(1篇);烟草零售商数量的大幅减少(1篇);尼古丁含量极低的规定(VLNC;2篇);以及多成分政策干预(4篇):现有证据主要集中于烟草税增加对 ITT 的影响,同样数量的研究描述了 ITT 的增加或对 ITT 没有影响,反驳了烟草税增加是 ITT 增加的主要驱动力的说法。其他烟草控制政策对 ITT 影响的证据有限。我们需要共同努力制定准确一致的方法来评估 ITT。