Household behaviour change interventions to improve sanitation and hygiene practices in urban settings: a scoping review

Clara MacLeod, Katherine Davies, Mwamba Mwenge, Jenala Chipungu, Oliver Cumming, Robert Dreibelbis
{"title":"Household behaviour change interventions to improve sanitation and hygiene practices in urban settings: a scoping review","authors":"Clara MacLeod, Katherine Davies, Mwamba Mwenge, Jenala Chipungu, Oliver Cumming, Robert Dreibelbis","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.20.24312313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Behaviour change interventions have the potential to improve sanitation and hygiene practices in urban settings. However, the evidence on which behaviour change interventions are effective is unclear. This scoping review assesses the effectiveness of behaviour change interventions on sanitation and hygiene practices in urban settings. Methods: We performed electronic searches across five databases and one grey literature database to identify relevant studies published between 1 January 1990 and 20 November 2023 in English. Eligible study designs included randomised and non-randomised controlled trials with a concurrent control. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported a behaviour change intervention for improving sanitation and/or hygiene practices in an urban setting. Individual behaviour change intervention components were mapped to one of nine intervention functions of the capabilities, opportunities, motivations, and behaviour (COM-B) framework. Risk of bias was assessed for each study using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: After de-duplication, 8,249 documents were screened by abstract and title, with 79 documents retrieved for full-text screening. We included 13 studies ranging from low- to high-quality. The behaviour change interventions had mixed effects on sanitation and hygiene practices in urban settings. Specifically, interventions improved latrine quality but not safe child faeces disposal. Interventions often improved handwashing with soap at key times and sometimes increased the presence of soap and water at the handwashing facility. There is limited evidence on the effect on food hygiene practices. Most study outcomes were measured between 6 and 12 months after intervention implementation, which may undermine the sustainability of behaviour change interventions. Conclusion: Despite mixed effects on sanitation and hygiene outcomes, behaviour change interventions can improve certain practices in urban settings, such as latrine quality improvements and handwashing with soap at the household or compound level. More ambitious behaviour change interventions are needed to reduce disparities in sanitation and hygiene access in urban areas globally.","PeriodicalId":501276,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.20.24312313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Behaviour change interventions have the potential to improve sanitation and hygiene practices in urban settings. However, the evidence on which behaviour change interventions are effective is unclear. This scoping review assesses the effectiveness of behaviour change interventions on sanitation and hygiene practices in urban settings. Methods: We performed electronic searches across five databases and one grey literature database to identify relevant studies published between 1 January 1990 and 20 November 2023 in English. Eligible study designs included randomised and non-randomised controlled trials with a concurrent control. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported a behaviour change intervention for improving sanitation and/or hygiene practices in an urban setting. Individual behaviour change intervention components were mapped to one of nine intervention functions of the capabilities, opportunities, motivations, and behaviour (COM-B) framework. Risk of bias was assessed for each study using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: After de-duplication, 8,249 documents were screened by abstract and title, with 79 documents retrieved for full-text screening. We included 13 studies ranging from low- to high-quality. The behaviour change interventions had mixed effects on sanitation and hygiene practices in urban settings. Specifically, interventions improved latrine quality but not safe child faeces disposal. Interventions often improved handwashing with soap at key times and sometimes increased the presence of soap and water at the handwashing facility. There is limited evidence on the effect on food hygiene practices. Most study outcomes were measured between 6 and 12 months after intervention implementation, which may undermine the sustainability of behaviour change interventions. Conclusion: Despite mixed effects on sanitation and hygiene outcomes, behaviour change interventions can improve certain practices in urban settings, such as latrine quality improvements and handwashing with soap at the household or compound level. More ambitious behaviour change interventions are needed to reduce disparities in sanitation and hygiene access in urban areas globally.
为改善城市环境卫生和个人卫生习惯而采取的家庭行为改变干预措施:范围界定审查
介绍:行为改变干预措施具有改善城市环境卫生和个人卫生习惯的潜力。然而,有关哪些行为改变干预措施有效的证据尚不明确。本范围界定综述评估了行为改变干预措施对城市环境卫生和个人卫生习惯的有效性。研究方法我们在五个数据库和一个灰色文献数据库中进行了电子检索,以确定 1990 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 11 月 20 日期间用英语发表的相关研究。符合条件的研究设计包括随机对照试验和非随机对照试验以及同时进行的对照试验。如果研究报告了为改善城市环境卫生和/或个人卫生习惯而采取的行为改变干预措施,则符合纳入条件。行为改变干预的各个组成部分被映射到能力、机会、动机和行为(COM-B)框架的九项干预功能之一。采用改编的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对每项研究的偏倚风险进行了评估。研究结果经过去重后,根据摘要和标题筛选出 8,249 篇文献,并检索出 79 篇文献进行全文筛选。我们纳入了 13 项从低质量到高质量的研究。行为改变干预措施对城市环境卫生和个人卫生习惯的影响不一。具体来说,干预措施改善了厕所质量,但没有改善儿童粪便的安全处理。干预措施通常改善了在关键时刻用肥皂洗手的情况,有时还增加了洗手设施中肥皂和水的数量。有关对食品卫生习惯的影响的证据有限。大多数研究结果都是在干预措施实施 6 至 12 个月后进行测量的,这可能会影响行为改变干预措施的可持续性。结论尽管对环境卫生和个人卫生结果的影响参差不齐,但行为改变干预措施可以改善城市环境中的某些做法,如提高厕所质量以及在家庭或院落层面使用肥皂洗手。要在全球范围内减少城市地区环境卫生和个人卫生方面的差距,需要采取更多雄心勃勃的行为改变干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信