Patterns of Medical Care Cost by Service Type Associated with Lung Cancer Screening

Kris Wain, Mahesh Maiyani, Nikki M. Carroll, Rafael Meza, Robert T. Greenlee, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Michelle R. Odelberg, Caryn Oshiro, Debra P. Ritzwoller
{"title":"Patterns of Medical Care Cost by Service Type Associated with Lung Cancer Screening","authors":"Kris Wain, Mahesh Maiyani, Nikki M. Carroll, Rafael Meza, Robert T. Greenlee, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Michelle R. Odelberg, Caryn Oshiro, Debra P. Ritzwoller","doi":"arxiv-2409.06026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Lung cancer screening (LCS) increases early-stage cancer\ndetection which may reduce cancer treatment costs. Little is known about how\nreceipt of LCS affects healthcare costs in real-world clinical settings. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed utilization and cost data from the\nPopulation-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process Lung Consortium. We\nincluded individuals who met age and smoking LCS eligibility criteria and were\nengaged within four healthcare systems between February 5, 2015, and December\n31, 2021. Generalized linear models estimated healthcare costs from the payer\nperspective during 12-months prior and 12-months post baseline LCS. We compared\nthese costs to eligible individuals who did not receive LCS. Sensitivity\nanalyses expanded our sample to age-eligible individuals with any smoking\nhistory noted in the electronic health record. Secondary analyses examined\ncosts among a sample diagnosed with lung cancer. We reported mean predicted\ncosts with average values for all other explanatory variables. Results: We identified 10,049 eligible individuals who received baseline LCS\nand 15,233 who did not receive baseline LCS. Receipt of baseline LCS was\nassociated with additional costs of $3,698 compared to individuals not\nreceiving LCS. Secondary analyses showed suggestive evidence that LCS prior to\ncancer diagnosis decreased healthcare costs compared to cancer diagnosed\nwithout screening. Conclusion: These findings suggest LCS increases healthcare costs in the year\nfollowing screening. However, LCS also improves early-stage cancer detection\nand may reduce treatment costs following diagnosis. These results can inform\nfuture simulation models to guide LCS recommendations, and aid health policy\ndecision makers on resource allocation.","PeriodicalId":501273,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer screening (LCS) increases early-stage cancer detection which may reduce cancer treatment costs. Little is known about how receipt of LCS affects healthcare costs in real-world clinical settings. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed utilization and cost data from the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process Lung Consortium. We included individuals who met age and smoking LCS eligibility criteria and were engaged within four healthcare systems between February 5, 2015, and December 31, 2021. Generalized linear models estimated healthcare costs from the payer perspective during 12-months prior and 12-months post baseline LCS. We compared these costs to eligible individuals who did not receive LCS. Sensitivity analyses expanded our sample to age-eligible individuals with any smoking history noted in the electronic health record. Secondary analyses examined costs among a sample diagnosed with lung cancer. We reported mean predicted costs with average values for all other explanatory variables. Results: We identified 10,049 eligible individuals who received baseline LCS and 15,233 who did not receive baseline LCS. Receipt of baseline LCS was associated with additional costs of $3,698 compared to individuals not receiving LCS. Secondary analyses showed suggestive evidence that LCS prior to cancer diagnosis decreased healthcare costs compared to cancer diagnosed without screening. Conclusion: These findings suggest LCS increases healthcare costs in the year following screening. However, LCS also improves early-stage cancer detection and may reduce treatment costs following diagnosis. These results can inform future simulation models to guide LCS recommendations, and aid health policy decision makers on resource allocation.
与肺癌筛查相关的按服务类型划分的医疗费用模式
简介肺癌筛查(LCS)可提高早期癌症检测率,从而降低癌症治疗成本。在真实的临床环境中,人们对接受肺癌筛查如何影响医疗成本知之甚少。方法:这项回顾性研究分析了 "基于人群的肺部筛查优化研究联盟"(Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process Lung Consortium)提供的利用率和成本数据。我们纳入了符合年龄和吸烟 LCS 资格标准的个人,他们在 2015 年 2 月 5 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间参与了四个医疗保健系统。广义线性模型从支付方角度估算了基线 LCS 之前 12 个月和之后 12 个月的医疗成本。我们将这些成本与未接受 LCS 的合格个人进行了比较。敏感性分析将样本扩大到电子健康记录中记录有任何吸烟史的符合年龄的人群。二次分析对确诊为肺癌的样本进行了成本调查。我们报告了预测成本的平均值以及所有其他解释变量的平均值。结果:我们确定了 10,049 名符合条件的患者接受了基线 LCS,15,233 名患者未接受基线 LCS。与未接受基线 LCS 的患者相比,接受基线 LCS 的患者的额外费用为 3,698 美元。二次分析显示,有提示性证据表明,与未经筛查确诊的癌症相比,癌症确诊前的 LCS 降低了医疗成本。结论:这些研究结果表明,LCS 会增加筛查后一年的医疗费用。然而,LCS 也能提高早期癌症的检测率,并可能降低诊断后的治疗成本。这些结果可以为未来的模拟模型提供信息,以指导 LCS 建议,并帮助医疗决策者进行资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信