{"title":"Mechanisms for belief elicitation without ground truth","authors":"Niklas Valentin Lehmann","doi":"arxiv-2409.07277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review article examines the challenge of eliciting truthful information\nfrom multiple individuals when such information cannot be verified against an\nobjective truth, a problem known as information elicitation without\nverification (IEWV). This article reviews over 25 mechanisms designed to\nincentivize truth-telling in such scenarios, and their effectiveness in\nempirical studies. The analysis finds that although many mechanisms\ntheoretically ensure truthfulness as a Bayesian Nash Equilibrium, empirical\nevidence of such mechanisms working in practice is very limited and generally\nweak. Consequently, more empirical research is needed to validate mechanisms.\nGiven that many mechanisms are very complex and cannot be easily conveyed to\nresearch subjects, this review suggests that simpler, more intuitive mechanisms\nmay be easier to test and apply.","PeriodicalId":501273,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This review article examines the challenge of eliciting truthful information
from multiple individuals when such information cannot be verified against an
objective truth, a problem known as information elicitation without
verification (IEWV). This article reviews over 25 mechanisms designed to
incentivize truth-telling in such scenarios, and their effectiveness in
empirical studies. The analysis finds that although many mechanisms
theoretically ensure truthfulness as a Bayesian Nash Equilibrium, empirical
evidence of such mechanisms working in practice is very limited and generally
weak. Consequently, more empirical research is needed to validate mechanisms.
Given that many mechanisms are very complex and cannot be easily conveyed to
research subjects, this review suggests that simpler, more intuitive mechanisms
may be easier to test and apply.