Enhanced mud retention as an autogenic mechanism for sustained delta growth: Insight from records of the Lafourche subdelta of the Mississippi River

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Minsik Kim, Byongsuk Chun, Elizabeth Chamberlain, Wonsuck Kim
{"title":"Enhanced mud retention as an autogenic mechanism for sustained delta growth: Insight from records of the Lafourche subdelta of the Mississippi River","authors":"Minsik Kim, Byongsuk Chun, Elizabeth Chamberlain, Wonsuck Kim","doi":"10.1111/sed.13230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mud deposition is acknowledged as a significant contributor to delta architecture, yet its role is often oversimplified as a constant parameter in models of delta formation. A better understanding of mud retention on deltas would resolve remaining questions regarding delta growth. This study explores how spatiotemporally varied mud retention facilitates sustained delta growth in defiance of the concept of autoretreat, that is, the idea that shoreline progradation rates decline as a delta grows due to the expansion of subaqueous and subaerial delta surfaces. This research is inspired by prior field observations of the river‐dominated Mississippi Delta, USA, where the shoreline of a <jats:italic>ca</jats:italic> 6000 to 8000 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> subdelta prograded at a constant rate for roughly a millennium, despite its expanding delta surface, compaction and sea‐level rise. For this, a laterally averaged one‐dimensional numerical model is leveraged to test hypotheses that enhanced mud retention with time in: (i) the delta bottomset; and (ii) the delta plain (floodplain) supports a constant rate of shoreline progradation in a maturing delta. Results demonstrate that enhanced mud retention in both the bottomset and delta plain facilitates sustained delta growth. Neither component by itself can replicate the case study. Yet, with these two integrated components, the model reproduces the cross‐section and linearly prograding pattern observed in the Mississippi Delta. The findings provide an autogenic mechanism for sustained delta growth and support the importance of mud as a fundamental building block of deltas that should be incorporated in delta‐growth models of engineered river diversions.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.13230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mud deposition is acknowledged as a significant contributor to delta architecture, yet its role is often oversimplified as a constant parameter in models of delta formation. A better understanding of mud retention on deltas would resolve remaining questions regarding delta growth. This study explores how spatiotemporally varied mud retention facilitates sustained delta growth in defiance of the concept of autoretreat, that is, the idea that shoreline progradation rates decline as a delta grows due to the expansion of subaqueous and subaerial delta surfaces. This research is inspired by prior field observations of the river‐dominated Mississippi Delta, USA, where the shoreline of a ca 6000 to 8000 km2 subdelta prograded at a constant rate for roughly a millennium, despite its expanding delta surface, compaction and sea‐level rise. For this, a laterally averaged one‐dimensional numerical model is leveraged to test hypotheses that enhanced mud retention with time in: (i) the delta bottomset; and (ii) the delta plain (floodplain) supports a constant rate of shoreline progradation in a maturing delta. Results demonstrate that enhanced mud retention in both the bottomset and delta plain facilitates sustained delta growth. Neither component by itself can replicate the case study. Yet, with these two integrated components, the model reproduces the cross‐section and linearly prograding pattern observed in the Mississippi Delta. The findings provide an autogenic mechanism for sustained delta growth and support the importance of mud as a fundamental building block of deltas that should be incorporated in delta‐growth models of engineered river diversions.
加强泥浆滞留是三角洲持续增长的自生机制:密西西比河拉弗什三角洲记录的启示
泥浆沉积被认为是造成三角洲结构的一个重要因素,但在三角洲形成模型中,泥浆沉积往往被过分简化为一个恒定参数。更好地理解三角洲上的泥浆滞留将解决有关三角洲生长的其余问题。本研究探讨了不同时空的淤泥滞留如何促进三角洲的持续增长,这与 "自恢复"(autoretreat)的概念背道而驰,"自恢复 "的概念是指随着三角洲的增长,水下和陆下三角洲表面的扩张会导致海岸线后退率下降。这项研究的灵感来自于之前对美国密西西比三角洲以河流为主的实地观测,在该三角洲,尽管三角洲表面不断扩大,出现了压实和海平面上升现象,但面积约 6000 至 8000 平方公里的次级三角洲的海岸线在大约一千年的时间里以恒定的速度向前推进。为此,我们利用横向平均一维数值模型来验证以下假设:随着时间的推移,三角洲底层和三角洲平原(冲积平原)的淤泥滞留能力增强,从而支持成熟三角洲海岸线以恒定的速度向前推进。研究结果表明,在三角洲底盘和三角洲平原加强泥浆滞留有利于三角洲的持续发展。这两个部分本身都无法复制案例研究。然而,综合这两个部分,模型再现了在密西西比三角洲观察到的横截面和线性增长模式。研究结果为三角洲的持续增长提供了一种自生机制,并证明了淤泥作为三角洲基本组成部分的重要性,应将其纳入工程引河的三角洲增长模型中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信