M. Kosiba, N. Cerardi, M. Pierre, F. Lanusse, C. Garrel, N. Werner, M. Shalak
{"title":"The cosmological analysis of X-ray cluster surveys: VI. Inference based on analytically simulated observable diagrams","authors":"M. Kosiba, N. Cerardi, M. Pierre, F. Lanusse, C. Garrel, N. Werner, M. Shalak","doi":"arxiv-2409.06001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number density of galaxy clusters across mass and redshift has been\nestablished as a powerful cosmological probe. Cosmological analyses with galaxy\nclusters traditionally employ scaling relations. However, many challenges arise\nfrom this approach as the scaling relations are highly scattered, may be\nill-calibrated, depend on the cosmology, and contain many nuisance parameters\nwith low physical significance. In this paper, we use a simulation-based\ninference method utilizing artificial neural networks to optimally extract\ncosmological information from a shallow X-ray survey of galaxy clusters, solely\nusing count rates (CR), hardness ratios (HR), and redshifts. This procedure\nenables us to conduct likelihood-free inference of cosmological parameters\n$\\Omega_{\\mathrm{m}}$ and $\\sigma_8$. We analytically generate simulations of\ngalaxy cluster distribution in a CR, HR space in multiple redshift bins based\non totally random combinations of cosmological and scaling relation parameters.\nWe train Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to retrieve the cosmological\nparameters from these simulations. We then use neural density estimation (NDE)\nneural networks to predict the posterior probability distribution of\n$\\Omega_{\\mathrm{m}}$ and $\\sigma_8$ given an input galaxy cluster sample. The\n1 $\\sigma$ errors of our density estimator on one of the target testing\nsimulations are 1000 deg$^2$: 15.2% for $\\Omega_{\\mathrm{m}}$ and 10.0% for\n$\\sigma_8$; 10000 deg$^2$: 9.6% for $\\Omega_{\\mathrm{m}}$ and 5.6% for\n$\\sigma_8$. We also compare our results with Fisher analysis. We demonstrate,\nas a proof of concept, that it is possible to calculate cosmological\npredictions of $\\Omega_{\\mathrm{m}}$ and $\\sigma_8$ from a galaxy cluster\npopulation without explicitly computing cluster masses and even, the scaling\nrelation coefficients, thus avoiding potential biases resulting from such a\nprocedure. [abridged]","PeriodicalId":501207,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The number density of galaxy clusters across mass and redshift has been
established as a powerful cosmological probe. Cosmological analyses with galaxy
clusters traditionally employ scaling relations. However, many challenges arise
from this approach as the scaling relations are highly scattered, may be
ill-calibrated, depend on the cosmology, and contain many nuisance parameters
with low physical significance. In this paper, we use a simulation-based
inference method utilizing artificial neural networks to optimally extract
cosmological information from a shallow X-ray survey of galaxy clusters, solely
using count rates (CR), hardness ratios (HR), and redshifts. This procedure
enables us to conduct likelihood-free inference of cosmological parameters
$\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}$ and $\sigma_8$. We analytically generate simulations of
galaxy cluster distribution in a CR, HR space in multiple redshift bins based
on totally random combinations of cosmological and scaling relation parameters.
We train Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to retrieve the cosmological
parameters from these simulations. We then use neural density estimation (NDE)
neural networks to predict the posterior probability distribution of
$\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}$ and $\sigma_8$ given an input galaxy cluster sample. The
1 $\sigma$ errors of our density estimator on one of the target testing
simulations are 1000 deg$^2$: 15.2% for $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}$ and 10.0% for
$\sigma_8$; 10000 deg$^2$: 9.6% for $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}$ and 5.6% for
$\sigma_8$. We also compare our results with Fisher analysis. We demonstrate,
as a proof of concept, that it is possible to calculate cosmological
predictions of $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}$ and $\sigma_8$ from a galaxy cluster
population without explicitly computing cluster masses and even, the scaling
relation coefficients, thus avoiding potential biases resulting from such a
procedure. [abridged]