Donationem non facit? Donations to people in potestate of the donor in Roman law

Daniele Curir
{"title":"Donationem non facit? Donations to people in potestate of the donor in Roman law","authors":"Daniele Curir","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20241202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>The paper focuses on the phenomenon of donation to people <em>in potestate</em> of the donor. Even though this kind of donation was an old practice in Roman society, classical jurisprudence considered it void due to the lack of legal capacity of the people <em>alieni iuris</em>. However, we can see that beginning from the Severian age, the jurists and then the imperial chancery gradually stated the validity of these acts of liberality, contingent upon certain conditions primarily based on the donor’s <em>voluntas</em>. The analysis of <em>responsa</em> and <em>rescripta</em> related to this subject highlights how this <em>concessio</em> worked under a juridical point of view, along with its progression. Finally, it is highlighted how this <em>interpretatio</em> was part of a broader phenomenon occurring in the 3rd century <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">a.d.</span> and aimed to value the donor’s <em>voluntas</em>.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Legal History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20241202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary

The paper focuses on the phenomenon of donation to people in potestate of the donor. Even though this kind of donation was an old practice in Roman society, classical jurisprudence considered it void due to the lack of legal capacity of the people alieni iuris. However, we can see that beginning from the Severian age, the jurists and then the imperial chancery gradually stated the validity of these acts of liberality, contingent upon certain conditions primarily based on the donor’s voluntas. The analysis of responsa and rescripta related to this subject highlights how this concessio worked under a juridical point of view, along with its progression. Finally, it is highlighted how this interpretatio was part of a broader phenomenon occurring in the 3rd century a.d. and aimed to value the donor’s voluntas.

Donationem non facit?罗马法中对捐赠人的捐赠
内容提要 本文主要论述了向捐赠者法定监护人捐赠的现象。尽管这种捐赠在罗马社会是一种古老的习俗,但古典法学认为,由于异族人缺乏法律行为能力,这种捐赠是无效的。然而,我们可以看到,从塞维利亚时代开始,法学家和帝国大法官逐渐声明这些慷慨行为的有效性,但主要以捐赠者的自愿为基础,并取决于某些条件。对与此相关的responsa和rescripta的分析强调了这种特许权是如何从法学角度发挥作用的,以及其发展过程。最后,还强调了这一解释如何成为公元 3 世纪出现的更广泛现象的一部分,并旨在重视捐赠者的自愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信