Machine learning algorithms for building height estimations using ICESat-2/ATLAS and Airborne LiDAR data

IF 2.7 4区 地球科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Muge Agca, Aslıhan Yucel, Efdal Kaya, Ali İhsan Daloglu, Mert Kayalık, Mevlut Yetkin, Femin Yalcın
{"title":"Machine learning algorithms for building height estimations using ICESat-2/ATLAS and Airborne LiDAR data","authors":"Muge Agca, Aslıhan Yucel, Efdal Kaya, Ali İhsan Daloglu, Mert Kayalık, Mevlut Yetkin, Femin Yalcın","doi":"10.1007/s12145-024-01429-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Building height information is essential for determining urban morphology, urban planning studies, and manage sustainable growth. This study aims to use machine learning algorithms to estimate building heights from airborne LiDAR and spaceborne ICESat-2/ATLAS data. The performance of different machine learning algorithms was investigated when analyzing ICESat-2/ATLAS and airborne LiDAR data. The accuracy of building height information was compared with field measurements. Machine learning algorithms such as K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Random Sample and Consensus (RANSAC) were used to classify spaceborne and airborne LiDAR data. Among all the algorithms applied to ICESat-2/ATLAS, the RF algorithm provided the best results for the strong and weak beams with 0.9683 and 0.9614, respectively. The K-NN yielded the best result for the airborne LiDAR dataset with 0.9999. Statistical analyzes were applied to both LiDAR datasets. The results of statistical analyzes for the pair of field measurement and ICESat-2 were R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9894, RMSE = 0.4131, MSE = 0.1706, MAE = 0.3184, and ME = 0.0003; for the pair of field measurement and airborne LiDAR: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.8368, RMSE = 1.9646, MSE = 3.8597, MAE = 1.0586, and ME = -0.3450; and for the pair of airborne LiDAR and ICESat-2: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.8275, RMSE = 1.6664, MSE = 2.7770, MAE = 0.9040, and ME = 0.4598. As a result of the analysis, it was seen that the data obtained from the ICESat-2 system was successful in estimating building height and provided reliable data.</p>","PeriodicalId":49318,"journal":{"name":"Earth Science Informatics","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Science Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01429-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building height information is essential for determining urban morphology, urban planning studies, and manage sustainable growth. This study aims to use machine learning algorithms to estimate building heights from airborne LiDAR and spaceborne ICESat-2/ATLAS data. The performance of different machine learning algorithms was investigated when analyzing ICESat-2/ATLAS and airborne LiDAR data. The accuracy of building height information was compared with field measurements. Machine learning algorithms such as K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Random Sample and Consensus (RANSAC) were used to classify spaceborne and airborne LiDAR data. Among all the algorithms applied to ICESat-2/ATLAS, the RF algorithm provided the best results for the strong and weak beams with 0.9683 and 0.9614, respectively. The K-NN yielded the best result for the airborne LiDAR dataset with 0.9999. Statistical analyzes were applied to both LiDAR datasets. The results of statistical analyzes for the pair of field measurement and ICESat-2 were R2 = 0.9894, RMSE = 0.4131, MSE = 0.1706, MAE = 0.3184, and ME = 0.0003; for the pair of field measurement and airborne LiDAR: R2 = 0.8368, RMSE = 1.9646, MSE = 3.8597, MAE = 1.0586, and ME = -0.3450; and for the pair of airborne LiDAR and ICESat-2: R2 = 0.8275, RMSE = 1.6664, MSE = 2.7770, MAE = 0.9040, and ME = 0.4598. As a result of the analysis, it was seen that the data obtained from the ICESat-2 system was successful in estimating building height and provided reliable data.

Abstract Image

利用 ICESat-2/ATLAS 和机载激光雷达数据估算建筑物高度的机器学习算法
建筑高度信息对于确定城市形态、城市规划研究和管理可持续增长至关重要。本研究旨在利用机器学习算法从机载 LiDAR 和空间 ICESat-2/ATLAS 数据中估算建筑高度。在分析 ICESat-2/ATLAS 和机载激光雷达数据时,研究了不同机器学习算法的性能。建筑物高度信息的准确性与实地测量结果进行了比较。K-近邻(K-NN)、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)、人工神经网络(ANN)和随机抽样与共识(RANSAC)等机器学习算法被用于对空间和机载激光雷达数据进行分类。在应用于 ICESat-2/ATLAS 的所有算法中,RF 算法对强光束和弱光束的分类结果最好,分别为 0.9683 和 0.9614。K-NN 算法为机载激光雷达数据集提供了最佳结果(0.9999)。统计分析适用于两个激光雷达数据集。实地测量和 ICESat-2 数据集的统计分析结果为:R2 = 0.9894,RMSE = 0.4131,MSE = 0.1706,MAE = 0.3184,ME = 0.0003;实地测量和机载激光雷达数据集的统计分析结果为:R2 = 0.8368, RMSE = 1.9646, MSE = 3.8597, MAE = 1.0586, ME = -0.3450; 而对于机载 LiDAR 和 ICESat-2 这对:R2 = 0.8275, RMSE = 1.6664, MSE = 2.7770, MAE = 0.9040, ME = 0.4598。分析结果表明,ICESat-2 系统获得的数据成功地估算了建筑物高度,并提供了可靠的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth Science Informatics
Earth Science Informatics COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: The Earth Science Informatics [ESIN] journal aims at rapid publication of high-quality, current, cutting-edge, and provocative scientific work in the area of Earth Science Informatics as it relates to Earth systems science and space science. This includes articles on the application of formal and computational methods, computational Earth science, spatial and temporal analyses, and all aspects of computer applications to the acquisition, storage, processing, interchange, and visualization of data and information about the materials, properties, processes, features, and phenomena that occur at all scales and locations in the Earth system’s five components (atmosphere, hydrosphere, geosphere, biosphere, cryosphere) and in space (see "About this journal" for more detail). The quarterly journal publishes research, methodology, and software articles, as well as editorials, comments, and book and software reviews. Review articles of relevant findings, topics, and methodologies are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信