Iterative Graph Alignment

Fangyuan Yu, Hardeep Singh Arora, Matt Johnson
{"title":"Iterative Graph Alignment","authors":"Fangyuan Yu, Hardeep Singh Arora, Matt Johnson","doi":"arxiv-2408.16667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By compressing diverse narratives, LLMs go beyond memorization, achieving\nintelligence by capturing generalizable causal relationships. However, they\nsuffer from local 'representation gaps' due to insufficient training data\ndiversity, limiting their real-world utility, especially in tasks requiring\nstrict alignment to rules. Traditional alignment methods relying on heavy human\nannotations are inefficient and unscalable. Recent self-alignment techniques\nalso fall short, as they often depend on self-selection based prompting and\nmemorization-based learning. To address these issues, we introduce Iterative\nGraph Alignment (IGA), an annotation-free rule-based alignment algorithm. A\nteacher model (VLM) employs Iterative Graph Prompting (IGP) to create logical\ngraphs and reference answers. The student model (LLM) identifies local\nknowledge gaps by attempting to align its responses with these references,\ncollaborating with helper models to generate diverse answers. These aligned\nresponses are then used for iterative supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Our\nevaluations across five rule-based scenarios demonstrate IGP's effectiveness,\nwith a 73.12\\% alignment improvement in Claude Sonnet 3.5, and\nLlama3-8B-Instruct achieving an 86.20\\% improvement, outperforming Claude\nSonnet 3.5 in rule-based alignment.","PeriodicalId":501315,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Multiagent Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Multiagent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.16667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By compressing diverse narratives, LLMs go beyond memorization, achieving intelligence by capturing generalizable causal relationships. However, they suffer from local 'representation gaps' due to insufficient training data diversity, limiting their real-world utility, especially in tasks requiring strict alignment to rules. Traditional alignment methods relying on heavy human annotations are inefficient and unscalable. Recent self-alignment techniques also fall short, as they often depend on self-selection based prompting and memorization-based learning. To address these issues, we introduce Iterative Graph Alignment (IGA), an annotation-free rule-based alignment algorithm. A teacher model (VLM) employs Iterative Graph Prompting (IGP) to create logical graphs and reference answers. The student model (LLM) identifies local knowledge gaps by attempting to align its responses with these references, collaborating with helper models to generate diverse answers. These aligned responses are then used for iterative supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Our evaluations across five rule-based scenarios demonstrate IGP's effectiveness, with a 73.12\% alignment improvement in Claude Sonnet 3.5, and Llama3-8B-Instruct achieving an 86.20\% improvement, outperforming Claude Sonnet 3.5 in rule-based alignment.
迭代图对齐
通过压缩不同的叙述,LLM 超越了记忆,通过捕捉可概括的因果关系实现智能。然而,由于训练数据的多样性不足,它们受到局部 "表征差距 "的困扰,从而限制了它们在现实世界中的实用性,尤其是在需要与规则严格对齐的任务中。传统的配准方法依赖于大量的人工标注,效率低下且不可扩展。最新的自对齐技术也存在不足,因为它们通常依赖于基于提示的自选择和基于记忆的学习。为了解决这些问题,我们引入了迭代图配准(IGA)--一种无需注释、基于规则的配准算法。教师模型(VLM)采用迭代图提示(IGP)来创建逻辑图和参考答案。学生模型(LLM)通过尝试将自己的回答与这些参考答案对齐来识别本地知识差距,并与辅助模型协作生成不同的答案。这些对齐后的答案将用于迭代监督微调(SFT)。对五个基于规则的场景进行的评估证明了IGP的有效性,在Claude Sonnet 3.5中,对齐率提高了73.12%;在基于规则的对齐中,Llama3-8B-Instruct提高了86.20%,超过了Claude Sonnet 3.5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信