Effects of Integrating Jaw Opening and Closing Movements with Active Neck Exercises in the Management of Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Q4 Medicine
Medicina Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.3390/medicina60091437
Saeed Akhter, Hamayun Zafar, Ashfaq Ahmad, Waqas Ahmed Farooqui
{"title":"Effects of Integrating Jaw Opening and Closing Movements with Active Neck Exercises in the Management of Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Saeed Akhter, Hamayun Zafar, Ashfaq Ahmad, Waqas Ahmed Farooqui","doi":"10.3390/medicina60091437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: It has been seen that jaw opening is associated with neck extension and jaw closing is associated with neck flexion. This natural association between the jaw and neck can be used as a novel approach to treat chronic non-specific neck pain, although the effects of this concept have never been previously evaluated as a treatment strategy. This article intends to study the effects of integrating jaw opening and closing movements along with active neck exercises versus active neck exercises alone in the management of chronic non-specific neck pain. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 patients, aged 20 to 50, with chronic non-specific neck pain were included in a double-blind randomized controlled trial, conducted at the Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Karachi, Pakistan from 2018 to 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A patients were assigned jaw movements with active neck exercises, while Group B patients were assigned only active neck exercises. Both groups were assigned isometric neck strengthening exercises as a home plan. The study used various outcome measures, including the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), neck disability index (NDI), neck flexion endurance (NFE), neck extension endurance (NEE), the neck proprioception error (NPE), neck flexion proprioception error (NFPE), neck extension proprioception error (NEPE), neck right rotation proprioception error (NRRPE), and neck left rotation proprioception error (NLRPE), with measurements taken at week 1 and week 6, respectively; the mean differences between the groups were measured using a two-way repeated ANOVA. Results: The experimental group showed better improvements compared to the control group, NPRS (73%), NDI (57%), NFE (152%), NEE (83%), NFPE (58%), NEPE (65%), NRRPE (65%), and NLRPE (62%), with a significant difference (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Active neck extension and flexion movements combined with jaw opening and closing are more effective in reducing pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain.","PeriodicalId":18512,"journal":{"name":"Medicina","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: It has been seen that jaw opening is associated with neck extension and jaw closing is associated with neck flexion. This natural association between the jaw and neck can be used as a novel approach to treat chronic non-specific neck pain, although the effects of this concept have never been previously evaluated as a treatment strategy. This article intends to study the effects of integrating jaw opening and closing movements along with active neck exercises versus active neck exercises alone in the management of chronic non-specific neck pain. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 patients, aged 20 to 50, with chronic non-specific neck pain were included in a double-blind randomized controlled trial, conducted at the Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Karachi, Pakistan from 2018 to 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A patients were assigned jaw movements with active neck exercises, while Group B patients were assigned only active neck exercises. Both groups were assigned isometric neck strengthening exercises as a home plan. The study used various outcome measures, including the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), neck disability index (NDI), neck flexion endurance (NFE), neck extension endurance (NEE), the neck proprioception error (NPE), neck flexion proprioception error (NFPE), neck extension proprioception error (NEPE), neck right rotation proprioception error (NRRPE), and neck left rotation proprioception error (NLRPE), with measurements taken at week 1 and week 6, respectively; the mean differences between the groups were measured using a two-way repeated ANOVA. Results: The experimental group showed better improvements compared to the control group, NPRS (73%), NDI (57%), NFE (152%), NEE (83%), NFPE (58%), NEPE (65%), NRRPE (65%), and NLRPE (62%), with a significant difference (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Active neck extension and flexion movements combined with jaw opening and closing are more effective in reducing pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain.
将下颌开合运动与颈部主动运动相结合治疗慢性非特异性颈痛的效果:随机对照试验
背景和目的:人们发现,下颌张开与颈部伸展有关,而下颌闭合与颈部屈曲有关。下颌和颈部之间的这种自然联系可被用作治疗慢性非特异性颈部疼痛的一种新方法,尽管这一概念的效果以前从未作为一种治疗策略进行过评估。本文旨在研究在治疗慢性非特异性颈部疼痛时,将下颌开合运动与颈部主动运动相结合与单独进行颈部主动运动的效果。材料和方法:2018年至2022年,巴基斯坦卡拉奇信德物理医学与康复研究所开展了一项双盲随机对照试验,共纳入了80名20至50岁的慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者。患者被分为两组:A 组患者在进行下颌运动的同时进行积极的颈部锻炼,而 B 组患者只进行积极的颈部锻炼。两组患者均被指定进行颈部等长强化训练作为家庭计划。研究采用了多种结果测量方法,包括疼痛评分量表(NPRS)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)、颈部屈曲耐力(NFE)、颈部伸展耐力(NEE)、颈部本体感觉误差(NPE)、颈部屈曲本体感觉误差(NFPE)、颈部伸展本体感觉误差(NEPE)、颈部右旋本体感觉误差(NRRPE)和颈部左旋本体感觉误差(NLRPE),分别在第 1 周和第 6 周进行测量;采用双向重复方差分析测量各组间的平均差异。结果显示与对照组相比,实验组在 NPRS (73%)、NDI (57%)、NFE (152%)、NEE (83%)、NFPE (58%)、NEPE (65%)、NRRPE (65%) 和 NLRPE (62%) 方面有更好的改善,差异显著(P < 0.05)。结论积极的颈部伸展和屈曲运动结合下颌开合运动能更有效地减轻慢性颈痛患者的疼痛和残疾程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina
Medicina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Publicada con el apoyo del Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva. Medicina no tiene propósitos comerciales. El objeto de su creación ha sido propender al adelanto de la medicina argentina. Los beneficios que pudieran obtenerse serán aplicados exclusivamente a ese fin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信