Pre-fire assessment of post-fire debris-flow hazards in the Santa Fe Municipal Watershed

IF 2.9 3区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Manuel Lopez, Ellis Margolis, Anne Tillery, Steve Bassett, Alan Hook
{"title":"Pre-fire assessment of post-fire debris-flow hazards in the Santa Fe Municipal Watershed","authors":"Manuel Lopez, Ellis Margolis, Anne Tillery, Steve Bassett, Alan Hook","doi":"10.1071/wf23065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Background</strong><p>Wildfires are increasing in size and severity due to climate change combined with overstocked forests. Fire increases the likelihood of debris flows, posing significant threats to life, property, and water supplies.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>We conducted a debris-flow hazard assessment of the Santa Fe Municipal Watershed (SFMW) to answer two questions: (1) where are debris flows most likely to occur; and (2) how much debris might they produce? We also document the influence of fuel treatments on fire severity and debris flows.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>We modelled post-fire debris-flow likelihood and volume in 103 sub-basins for 2-year, 5-year, and Probable Maximum Precipitation rainfalls following modelled low-, moderate-, and high-severity wildfires.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>Post-fire debris-flow likelihoods were &gt;90% in all but the lowest fire and rain scenarios. Sub-basins with fuel treatments had the lowest burn severities, debris-flow likelihoods, and sediment volumes, but treatment effects decreased with increased fire severity and rain intensity.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Post-fire debris flows with varying debris volumes are likely to occur following wildfire in the SFMW, but fuel treatments can reduce likelihood and volume.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>Future post-fire debris flows will continue to threaten water supplies, but fuel reduction treatments and debris-flow mitigation provide opportunities to minimise effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":14464,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wildland Fire","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Wildland Fire","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/wf23065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Wildfires are increasing in size and severity due to climate change combined with overstocked forests. Fire increases the likelihood of debris flows, posing significant threats to life, property, and water supplies.

Aims

We conducted a debris-flow hazard assessment of the Santa Fe Municipal Watershed (SFMW) to answer two questions: (1) where are debris flows most likely to occur; and (2) how much debris might they produce? We also document the influence of fuel treatments on fire severity and debris flows.

Methods

We modelled post-fire debris-flow likelihood and volume in 103 sub-basins for 2-year, 5-year, and Probable Maximum Precipitation rainfalls following modelled low-, moderate-, and high-severity wildfires.

Key results

Post-fire debris-flow likelihoods were >90% in all but the lowest fire and rain scenarios. Sub-basins with fuel treatments had the lowest burn severities, debris-flow likelihoods, and sediment volumes, but treatment effects decreased with increased fire severity and rain intensity.

Conclusions

Post-fire debris flows with varying debris volumes are likely to occur following wildfire in the SFMW, but fuel treatments can reduce likelihood and volume.

Implications

Future post-fire debris flows will continue to threaten water supplies, but fuel reduction treatments and debris-flow mitigation provide opportunities to minimise effects.

圣达菲市流域火灾前对火灾后泥石流危害的评估
背景由于气候变化和森林蓄积过多,野火的规模和严重程度都在不断增加。火灾增加了发生泥石流的可能性,对生命、财产和供水构成重大威胁。目的我们对圣达菲市流域(SFMW)进行了一次泥石流危害评估,以回答两个问题:(1)哪里最有可能发生泥石流;(2)泥石流可能产生多少泥石?我们还记录了燃料处理对火灾严重程度和泥石流的影响。方法我们在 103 个子流域模拟了低度、中度和高度野火发生后 2 年、5 年和可能最大降雨量的泥石流可能性和数量。主要结果 除最低火情和降雨情景外,所有其他情景下的火后泥石流可能性均为 90%。经过燃料处理的子流域的火灾严重程度、泥石流可能性和沉积物量最低,但处理效果随着火灾严重程度和降雨强度的增加而降低。结论SFMW地区野火后可能会发生泥石流,且泥石流量各不相同,但燃料处理可降低发生的可能性并减少泥石流量。影响未来的火后泥石流将继续威胁供水,但减少燃料处理和泥石流缓解措施提供了将影响降至最低的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
67
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Wildland Fire publishes new and significant articles that advance basic and applied research concerning wildland fire. Published papers aim to assist in the understanding of the basic principles of fire as a process, its ecological impact at the stand level and the landscape level, modelling fire and its effects, as well as presenting information on how to effectively and efficiently manage fire. The journal has an international perspective, since wildland fire plays a major social, economic and ecological role around the globe. The International Journal of Wildland Fire is published on behalf of the International Association of Wildland Fire.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信