Evaluation of early treatment with intravenous idursulfase and intrathecal idursulfase‐IT on cognitive function in siblings with neuronopathic mucopolysaccharidosis II
Joseph Muenzer, Barbara K. Burton, Paul Harmatz, Luis González Gutiérrez‐Solana, Matilde Ruiz‐Garcia, Simon A. Jones, Nathalie Guffon, Michal Inbar‐Feigenberg, Drago Bratkovic, Stewart Rust, Michael Hale, Yuna Wu, Karen S. Yee, David A. H. Whiteman, David Alexanderian
{"title":"Evaluation of early treatment with intravenous idursulfase and intrathecal idursulfase‐IT on cognitive function in siblings with neuronopathic mucopolysaccharidosis II","authors":"Joseph Muenzer, Barbara K. Burton, Paul Harmatz, Luis González Gutiérrez‐Solana, Matilde Ruiz‐Garcia, Simon A. Jones, Nathalie Guffon, Michal Inbar‐Feigenberg, Drago Bratkovic, Stewart Rust, Michael Hale, Yuna Wu, Karen S. Yee, David A. H. Whiteman, David Alexanderian","doi":"10.1002/jimd.12790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mucopolysaccharidosis II (MPS II; Hunter syndrome; OMIM 309900) is a rare, X‐linked, heterogeneous lysosomal storage disease. Approximately two‐thirds of patients develop cognitive impairment, which is difficult to assess in clinical trials, partly owing to the variable nature of cognitive impairment. Analyzing data from siblings can help to minimize this heterogeneity. We report analyses of cognitive function from siblings with MPS II enrolled in clinical trials: a natural history study (NCT01822184), a randomized, open‐label, phase 2/3 study of intravenous (IV) idursulfase with or without intrathecal idursulfase (idursulfase‐IT; NCT02055118), and its extension (NCT2412787). Cognitive function was assessed using Differential Abilities Scales, Second Edition General Conceptual Ability (DAS‐II GCA) scores; Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition; and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition Adaptive Behavior Composite (VABS‐II ABC). Seven sets of siblings (six pairs and one set of three) were included. All patients received IV idursulfase and 10 received subsequent idursulfase‐IT. Younger siblings initiated IV idursulfase at an earlier age than their older sibling(s) in six of the sets; the younger sibling started treatment before 1 year of age in three sets. Monthly idursulfase‐IT was generally associated with a stabilization of cognitive function: DAS‐II GCA and VABS‐II ABC scores were higher at age‐matched assessments in the majority of those who either received idursulfase‐IT earlier than their sibling or who received idursulfase‐IT versus no idursulfase‐IT. These data suggest that early initiation of intrathecal enzyme replacement therapy may stabilize or slow cognitive decline in some patients with neuronopathic MPS II.","PeriodicalId":16281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jimd.12790","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mucopolysaccharidosis II (MPS II; Hunter syndrome; OMIM 309900) is a rare, X‐linked, heterogeneous lysosomal storage disease. Approximately two‐thirds of patients develop cognitive impairment, which is difficult to assess in clinical trials, partly owing to the variable nature of cognitive impairment. Analyzing data from siblings can help to minimize this heterogeneity. We report analyses of cognitive function from siblings with MPS II enrolled in clinical trials: a natural history study (NCT01822184), a randomized, open‐label, phase 2/3 study of intravenous (IV) idursulfase with or without intrathecal idursulfase (idursulfase‐IT; NCT02055118), and its extension (NCT2412787). Cognitive function was assessed using Differential Abilities Scales, Second Edition General Conceptual Ability (DAS‐II GCA) scores; Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition; and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition Adaptive Behavior Composite (VABS‐II ABC). Seven sets of siblings (six pairs and one set of three) were included. All patients received IV idursulfase and 10 received subsequent idursulfase‐IT. Younger siblings initiated IV idursulfase at an earlier age than their older sibling(s) in six of the sets; the younger sibling started treatment before 1 year of age in three sets. Monthly idursulfase‐IT was generally associated with a stabilization of cognitive function: DAS‐II GCA and VABS‐II ABC scores were higher at age‐matched assessments in the majority of those who either received idursulfase‐IT earlier than their sibling or who received idursulfase‐IT versus no idursulfase‐IT. These data suggest that early initiation of intrathecal enzyme replacement therapy may stabilize or slow cognitive decline in some patients with neuronopathic MPS II.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease (JIMD) is the official journal of the Society for the Study of Inborn Errors of Metabolism (SSIEM). By enhancing communication between workers in the field throughout the world, the JIMD aims to improve the management and understanding of inherited metabolic disorders. It publishes results of original research and new or important observations pertaining to any aspect of inherited metabolic disease in humans and higher animals. This includes clinical (medical, dental and veterinary), biochemical, genetic (including cytogenetic, molecular and population genetic), experimental (including cell biological), methodological, theoretical, epidemiological, ethical and counselling aspects. The JIMD also reviews important new developments or controversial issues relating to metabolic disorders and publishes reviews and short reports arising from the Society''s annual symposia. A distinction is made between peer-reviewed scientific material that is selected because of its significance for other professionals in the field and non-peer- reviewed material that aims to be important, controversial, interesting or entertaining (“Extras”).