Comparative analysis of optimization approaches for combined economic emission dispatch- a comprehensive review

IF 1.5 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rafid Zidan Khlaif and Thamir Hassan Atyia
{"title":"Comparative analysis of optimization approaches for combined economic emission dispatch- a comprehensive review","authors":"Rafid Zidan Khlaif and Thamir Hassan Atyia","doi":"10.1088/2631-8695/ad7783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This comprehensive review explores a range of optimization approaches for Combined Economic Emission Dispatch (CEED), covering conventional, non-conventional, and hybrid techniques. CEED is critical in minimizing economic costs and emissions while ensuring power system reliability. Traditional methods focus on cost minimization but overlook environmental considerations. Optimization techniques address this gap by simultaneously optimizing economic and environmental objectives. Hybrid techniques, combining multiple algorithms or integrating renewable energy, further enhance CEED performance. The review evaluates these approaches’ strengths and limitations, considering factors like computational efficiency and solution accuracy. Over the past few decades, a great deal of study has been done on the use of renewable energy (RE) as an alternative source in power generation systems. As a result, the power dispatch problem currently uses the Combined Economic Emission Dispatch (CEED) of thermal and renewable energy resources. It discusses the potential of hybrid techniques and take in consideration renewable energy integration in achieving cost savings and emission reductions, highlighting areas for future research.","PeriodicalId":11753,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Research Express","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Research Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad7783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This comprehensive review explores a range of optimization approaches for Combined Economic Emission Dispatch (CEED), covering conventional, non-conventional, and hybrid techniques. CEED is critical in minimizing economic costs and emissions while ensuring power system reliability. Traditional methods focus on cost minimization but overlook environmental considerations. Optimization techniques address this gap by simultaneously optimizing economic and environmental objectives. Hybrid techniques, combining multiple algorithms or integrating renewable energy, further enhance CEED performance. The review evaluates these approaches’ strengths and limitations, considering factors like computational efficiency and solution accuracy. Over the past few decades, a great deal of study has been done on the use of renewable energy (RE) as an alternative source in power generation systems. As a result, the power dispatch problem currently uses the Combined Economic Emission Dispatch (CEED) of thermal and renewable energy resources. It discusses the potential of hybrid techniques and take in consideration renewable energy integration in achieving cost savings and emission reductions, highlighting areas for future research.
综合经济排放调度优化方法的比较分析--综述
本综述探讨了一系列优化联合经济排放调度(CEED)的方法,包括常规、非常规和混合技术。CEED 对于在确保电力系统可靠性的同时最大限度地降低经济成本和排放至关重要。传统方法侧重于成本最小化,但忽略了环境因素。优化技术通过同时优化经济和环境目标来弥补这一不足。结合多种算法或整合可再生能源的混合技术可进一步提高 CEED 性能。本综述考虑了计算效率和求解精度等因素,评估了这些方法的优势和局限性。在过去的几十年里,人们对使用可再生能源作为发电系统的替代能源进行了大量研究。因此,目前的电力调度问题采用的是热能和可再生能源的联合经济排放调度(CEED)。本报告讨论了混合技术的潜力,并考虑了可再生能源集成在实现成本节约和减排方面的作用,同时强调了未来研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Research Express
Engineering Research Express Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信