Dutch participatory surveillance framework for evaluating evolutionary changes on SARS-CoV-2 affecting Rapid Diagnostic Test sensitivity in 2022 - 2023.

Eva Kozanli, Wanda Han, Tara Smit, Jordy de Bakker, Mansoer Elahi, Ryanne Jaarsma, Gesa Carstens, Albert Jan van Hoek, Dirk Eggink
{"title":"Dutch participatory surveillance framework for evaluating evolutionary changes on SARS-CoV-2 affecting Rapid Diagnostic Test sensitivity in 2022 - 2023.","authors":"Eva Kozanli, Wanda Han, Tara Smit, Jordy de Bakker, Mansoer Elahi, Ryanne Jaarsma, Gesa Carstens, Albert Jan van Hoek, Dirk Eggink","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.10.24313404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nRapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) have been pivotal in the diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 and policies surrounding self-isolation. When self-testing policies are in place a decreased sensitivity of the virus to RDTs can give benefits for viral spread. However, to monitor for reduced sensitivity of RDTs we rely on the collection of SARS-CoV-2 positive samples from RDT negative patients. Infectieradar, a national participatory surveillance that registers influenza-like symptoms is used as a framework to study false-negative RDT results due to emergence of new virus variants. Methods\nParticipants report weekly on RDT use and symptoms linked to Acute Respiratory Illness (ARI). Each week, all RDT positive and a sample of 200 among RDT negative but symptomatic participants were invited to send in nose throat swabs (NTS). SARS-CoV-2 Ct-values are determined using RT-PCR on NTS samples for RDT positive and RDT (false) negative participants and compared. Sequencing is performed on all eligible samples for phylogenetic analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein and the whole genome sequence. NTS samples of participants with discordant RT-PCR and RDT results are also analyzed using RDTs by professionals in the laboratory. Results\nBetween October 2022 and October 2023, our study had 16,893 participants and we collected 1,757 self-test-positive/NTS PCR positive samples and 359 self-test-negative/NTS PCR positive samples (RDT-/PCR+). These participants were asked to take a SARS-CoV-2 RDT upon symptoms. Within SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive participants, we did not find characteristics that differ in SARS-CoV-2 RDT negative versus positive participants. There were no associations with specific changes in the N protein nor did our phylogenetic analysis show clustering of RDT negative samples. Conclusion\nEvaluating brand-specific RDT performance in Dutch population and false-negative RDT analyses, led to no evidence for SARS-CoV-2 evolution affecting RDT sensitivity. The participatory surveillance program Infectieradar is a powerful tool for our national surveillance on acute respiratory illnesses, as well as for research purposes. Since this framework offered both self-testing and the gold standard of PCR testing results.","PeriodicalId":501509,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.10.24313404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) have been pivotal in the diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 and policies surrounding self-isolation. When self-testing policies are in place a decreased sensitivity of the virus to RDTs can give benefits for viral spread. However, to monitor for reduced sensitivity of RDTs we rely on the collection of SARS-CoV-2 positive samples from RDT negative patients. Infectieradar, a national participatory surveillance that registers influenza-like symptoms is used as a framework to study false-negative RDT results due to emergence of new virus variants. Methods Participants report weekly on RDT use and symptoms linked to Acute Respiratory Illness (ARI). Each week, all RDT positive and a sample of 200 among RDT negative but symptomatic participants were invited to send in nose throat swabs (NTS). SARS-CoV-2 Ct-values are determined using RT-PCR on NTS samples for RDT positive and RDT (false) negative participants and compared. Sequencing is performed on all eligible samples for phylogenetic analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein and the whole genome sequence. NTS samples of participants with discordant RT-PCR and RDT results are also analyzed using RDTs by professionals in the laboratory. Results Between October 2022 and October 2023, our study had 16,893 participants and we collected 1,757 self-test-positive/NTS PCR positive samples and 359 self-test-negative/NTS PCR positive samples (RDT-/PCR+). These participants were asked to take a SARS-CoV-2 RDT upon symptoms. Within SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive participants, we did not find characteristics that differ in SARS-CoV-2 RDT negative versus positive participants. There were no associations with specific changes in the N protein nor did our phylogenetic analysis show clustering of RDT negative samples. Conclusion Evaluating brand-specific RDT performance in Dutch population and false-negative RDT analyses, led to no evidence for SARS-CoV-2 evolution affecting RDT sensitivity. The participatory surveillance program Infectieradar is a powerful tool for our national surveillance on acute respiratory illnesses, as well as for research purposes. Since this framework offered both self-testing and the gold standard of PCR testing results.
荷兰参与式监测框架,用于评估 2022 - 2023 年影响快速诊断检测灵敏度的 SARS-CoV-2 演变。
背景快速诊断试剂盒(RDTs)在诊断 SARS-CoV-2 和自我隔离政策方面发挥了关键作用。在实行自我检测政策时,如果病毒对快速诊断检测试剂盒的敏感性降低,就会有利于病毒的传播。然而,要监测 RDT 灵敏度的降低,我们需要从 RDT 阴性的患者中收集 SARS-CoV-2 阳性样本。Infectieradar 是一个登记流感样症状的全国性参与性监测系统,它被用作研究新病毒变种出现导致 RDT 结果假阴性的框架。方法参与者每周报告 RDT 的使用情况以及与急性呼吸道疾病(ARI)相关的症状。每周,所有 RDT 呈阳性的参与者和 RDT 呈阴性但有症状的参与者中的 200 个样本被邀请送检鼻咽拭子(NTS)。使用 RT-PCR 技术测定 RDT 阳性和 RDT(假)阴性参与者鼻咽拭子样本的 SARS-CoV-2 Ct 值,并进行比较。对所有符合条件的样本进行测序,以便对 SARS-CoV-2 核头壳蛋白和全基因组序列进行系统发育分析。对于 RT-PCR 和 RDT 检测结果不一致的参与者的 NTS 样本,也由实验室的专业人员使用 RDT 进行分析。结果在2022年10月至2023年10月期间,我们的研究共有16893名参与者,收集了1757份自测阳性/NTS PCR阳性样本和359份自测阴性/NTS PCR阳性样本(RDT-/PCR+)。这些参与者被要求在出现症状时进行 SARS-CoV-2 RDT 检测。在 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 阳性的参与者中,我们没有发现 SARS-CoV-2 RDT 阴性和阳性参与者的特征有什么不同。与 N 蛋白的特定变化没有关联,我们的系统进化分析也没有显示 RDT 阴性样本的聚类。结论评估荷兰人群中特定品牌 RDT 的性能和 RDT 假阴性分析结果表明,没有证据表明 SARS-CoV-2 的演变会影响 RDT 的灵敏度。参与式监测计划 Infectieradar 是我们对急性呼吸道疾病进行全国性监测和研究的有力工具。由于该框架既提供了自我检测,又提供了 PCR 检测结果的黄金标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信