Exploring the generalizability of the optimal 0.234 acceptance rate in random-walk Metropolis and parallel tempering algorithms

Aidan Li, Liyan Wang, Tianye Dou, Jeffrey S. Rosenthal
{"title":"Exploring the generalizability of the optimal 0.234 acceptance rate in random-walk Metropolis and parallel tempering algorithms","authors":"Aidan Li, Liyan Wang, Tianye Dou, Jeffrey S. Rosenthal","doi":"arxiv-2408.06894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For random-walk Metropolis (RWM) and parallel tempering (PT) algorithms, an\nasymptotic acceptance rate of around 0.234 is known to be optimal in the\nhigh-dimensional limit. Yet, the practical relevance of this value is uncertain\ndue to the restrictive conditions underlying its derivation. We synthesise\nprevious theoretical advances in extending the 0.234 acceptance rate to more\ngeneral settings, and demonstrate the applicability and generalizability of the\n0.234 theory for practitioners with a comprehensive empirical simulation study\non a variety of examples examining how acceptance rates affect Expected Squared\nJumping Distance (ESJD). Our experiments show the optimality of the 0.234\nacceptance rate for RWM is surprisingly robust even in lower dimensions across\nvarious proposal and multimodal target distributions which may or may not have\nan i.i.d. product density. Experiments on parallel tempering also show that the\nidealized 0.234 spacing of inverse temperatures may be approximately optimal\nfor low dimensions and non i.i.d. product target densities, and that\nconstructing an inverse temperature ladder with spacings given by a swap\nacceptance of 0.234 is a viable strategy. However, we observe the applicability\nof the 0.234 acceptance rate heuristic diminishes for both RWM and PT\nalgorithms below a certain dimension which differs based on the target density,\nand that inhomogeneously scaled components in the target density further\nreduces its applicability in lower dimensions.","PeriodicalId":501215,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Computation","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.06894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For random-walk Metropolis (RWM) and parallel tempering (PT) algorithms, an asymptotic acceptance rate of around 0.234 is known to be optimal in the high-dimensional limit. Yet, the practical relevance of this value is uncertain due to the restrictive conditions underlying its derivation. We synthesise previous theoretical advances in extending the 0.234 acceptance rate to more general settings, and demonstrate the applicability and generalizability of the 0.234 theory for practitioners with a comprehensive empirical simulation study on a variety of examples examining how acceptance rates affect Expected Squared Jumping Distance (ESJD). Our experiments show the optimality of the 0.234 acceptance rate for RWM is surprisingly robust even in lower dimensions across various proposal and multimodal target distributions which may or may not have an i.i.d. product density. Experiments on parallel tempering also show that the idealized 0.234 spacing of inverse temperatures may be approximately optimal for low dimensions and non i.i.d. product target densities, and that constructing an inverse temperature ladder with spacings given by a swap acceptance of 0.234 is a viable strategy. However, we observe the applicability of the 0.234 acceptance rate heuristic diminishes for both RWM and PT algorithms below a certain dimension which differs based on the target density, and that inhomogeneously scaled components in the target density further reduces its applicability in lower dimensions.
探索随机漫步 Metropolis 算法和并行调节算法中 0.234 最佳接受率的通用性
对于随机漫步 Metropolis(RWM)和并行调质(PT)算法来说,0.234 左右的渐近接受率是高维极限下的最佳值。然而,由于其推导所依据的限制性条件,该值的实际意义并不确定。我们综合了之前的理论进展,将 0.234 接受率扩展到了更一般的环境中,并通过对各种实例进行全面的实证模拟研究,考察了接受率如何影响期望平方跳转距离(ESJD),从而证明了 0.234 理论对实践者的适用性和普适性。我们的实验表明,0.234 接受率对于 RWM 的最优性出奇地稳健,即使是在较低维度上,也能跨越各种提议和多模式目标分布(可能有也可能没有 i.i.d. 乘积密度)。平行回火的实验还表明,理想化的 0.234 逆温间距对于低尺寸和非 i.i.d. 产品目标密度来说可能是近似最佳的,而且用 0.234 的交换接受度给出的间距来构建逆温阶梯是一种可行的策略。然而,我们观察到,0.234 接受率启发式对 RWM 和 PT 算法的适用性在一定维度以下会减弱,该维度根据目标密度的不同而不同,而且目标密度中不均匀缩放的成分会进一步降低其在较低维度的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信