Structural safety of in-service motorway tunnel linings under defective conditions

IF 1.5 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Wenjia Yan, Bin Wang, Rongfeng Li, Zonghan Liu, Junni Li, Min Zhang, Peng Li
{"title":"Structural safety of in-service motorway tunnel linings under defective conditions","authors":"Wenjia Yan, Bin Wang, Rongfeng Li, Zonghan Liu, Junni Li, Min Zhang, Peng Li","doi":"10.1088/2631-8695/ad6ff1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The structural safety of in-service tunnel lining structures is assessed and calculated using a numerical simulation based on the damage statistics of a motorway tunnel to study the effects of the surrounding rock classification, defect type, defect location, and severity of defects on the lining. The main conclusions are as follows. (1) Void defects mainly exist in the shoulder section and account for 73% of the total defects, whereas insufficient thickness is primarily observed at the sidewalls, accounting for 52% of the total defects. (2) As the width clearance of the tunnel increases, the safety factor of each region on the lining structure is reduced to different extents. Voids in the crown section have the highest impact on the safety factor of the lining structure. When the maximum width exceeds 2 m, the safety factor is reduced by up to 91.92%. (3) When the tunnel lining is insufficiently thick, the influence of the defect generally does not extend beyond the defective area. The maximum reduction rates of the safety factors for the crown, shoulder, and sidewalls are 91.28%, 96.12%, and 90.48%, respectively. (4) Thickness defects are more prevalent than void defects. Compared with insufficient thickness defects, void defects more considerably affect the safety factor of the lining structure. Hence, the results of this study can provide an engineering basis for the operational status of in-service tunnels.","PeriodicalId":11753,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Research Express","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Research Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad6ff1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The structural safety of in-service tunnel lining structures is assessed and calculated using a numerical simulation based on the damage statistics of a motorway tunnel to study the effects of the surrounding rock classification, defect type, defect location, and severity of defects on the lining. The main conclusions are as follows. (1) Void defects mainly exist in the shoulder section and account for 73% of the total defects, whereas insufficient thickness is primarily observed at the sidewalls, accounting for 52% of the total defects. (2) As the width clearance of the tunnel increases, the safety factor of each region on the lining structure is reduced to different extents. Voids in the crown section have the highest impact on the safety factor of the lining structure. When the maximum width exceeds 2 m, the safety factor is reduced by up to 91.92%. (3) When the tunnel lining is insufficiently thick, the influence of the defect generally does not extend beyond the defective area. The maximum reduction rates of the safety factors for the crown, shoulder, and sidewalls are 91.28%, 96.12%, and 90.48%, respectively. (4) Thickness defects are more prevalent than void defects. Compared with insufficient thickness defects, void defects more considerably affect the safety factor of the lining structure. Hence, the results of this study can provide an engineering basis for the operational status of in-service tunnels.
缺陷条件下在役高速公路隧道衬砌的结构安全
根据一条高速公路隧道的损坏统计数据,通过数值模拟评估和计算了在役隧道衬砌结构的结构安全性,研究了围岩分类、缺陷类型、缺陷位置和缺陷严重程度对衬砌的影响。主要结论如下(1)空洞缺陷主要存在于路肩部分,占总缺陷的 73%,而厚度不足主要出现在侧壁,占总缺陷的 52%。(2) 随着隧道宽度净空的增加,衬砌结构上每个区域的安全系数都有不同程度的降低。冠部的空洞对衬砌结构安全系数的影响最大。当最大宽度超过 2 米时,安全系数最多会降低 91.92%。(3) 当隧道衬砌厚度不足时,缺陷的影响一般不会超出缺陷区域。冠部、路肩和侧壁安全系数的最大降低率分别为 91.28%、96.12% 和 90.48%。(4) 厚度缺陷比空隙缺陷更普遍。与厚度不足的缺陷相比,空隙缺陷对衬砌结构安全系数的影响更大。因此,本研究的结果可为在役隧道的运营状况提供工程依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Research Express
Engineering Research Express Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信