Shouldering our Way into a More Meaningful Research Agenda for Atraumatic Shoulder Pain: A Priority Setting Study

Kristian Damgaard Lyng, Torben Krejberg Boersting, Mikkel Bek Clausen, Annelene Houen Larsen, Behnam Liaghat, Kim Gordon Ingwersen, Marcus Bateman, Amar Rangan, Karen Toftdahl Bjoernholdt, David Hoeyrup Christiansen, Steen Lund Jensen, Janus Laust Thomsen, Kristian Thorborg, Connie Ziegler, Jens Lykkegaard Olesen, Michael Skovdal Rathleff
{"title":"Shouldering our Way into a More Meaningful Research Agenda for Atraumatic Shoulder Pain: A Priority Setting Study","authors":"Kristian Damgaard Lyng, Torben Krejberg Boersting, Mikkel Bek Clausen, Annelene Houen Larsen, Behnam Liaghat, Kim Gordon Ingwersen, Marcus Bateman, Amar Rangan, Karen Toftdahl Bjoernholdt, David Hoeyrup Christiansen, Steen Lund Jensen, Janus Laust Thomsen, Kristian Thorborg, Connie Ziegler, Jens Lykkegaard Olesen, Michael Skovdal Rathleff","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.22.24312355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE: Atraumatic shoulder pain significantly burdens society and the individual. There is a growing need for involving patients and other stakeholders in setting the research agenda. OBJECTIVE: To use the voices of people with atraumatic shoulder pain, healthcare practitioners, and their relatives to establish research questions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This priority-setting study followed a modified approach originally formulated by the James Lind Alliance (JLA). The process consisted of six phases (initiation, consultation, collation, prioritization, validation, and reporting) and included two e-surveys and two separate virtual workshops. Data collection started on June 2021 until June 2023. We included people with atraumatic shoulder pain, relatives, healthcare practitioners managing shoulder pain, and researchers conducting research within the field. EXPOSURES: The first e-survey included basic demographic questions and the possibility to submit at least one and a maximum of five potential research questions. Based on a thematic analysis, questions were arranged into themes and related questions. In the second e-survey, participants were asked to prioritize the questions. Finally, two priority-setting partnership workshops were used to formulate a top-10 list. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A top-25 and top-10 list of research questions related to atraumatic shoulder pain. RESULTS: Initially, 297 participants submitted 1080 potential research questions. In the second e-survey, 290 participants prioritized these questions resulting in a compilation of the top 25. Based on discussions from the workshops with 21 participants, a top 10 list was created. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In the final top 10 list, the three research questions with the highest ranking concerned 1) translating the best available knowledge into clinical practice, 2) preventing shoulder pain, and 3) identifying who benefits from surgery. These questions inform future research funding and projects relating to atraumatic shoulder pain.","PeriodicalId":501386,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.22.24312355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Atraumatic shoulder pain significantly burdens society and the individual. There is a growing need for involving patients and other stakeholders in setting the research agenda. OBJECTIVE: To use the voices of people with atraumatic shoulder pain, healthcare practitioners, and their relatives to establish research questions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This priority-setting study followed a modified approach originally formulated by the James Lind Alliance (JLA). The process consisted of six phases (initiation, consultation, collation, prioritization, validation, and reporting) and included two e-surveys and two separate virtual workshops. Data collection started on June 2021 until June 2023. We included people with atraumatic shoulder pain, relatives, healthcare practitioners managing shoulder pain, and researchers conducting research within the field. EXPOSURES: The first e-survey included basic demographic questions and the possibility to submit at least one and a maximum of five potential research questions. Based on a thematic analysis, questions were arranged into themes and related questions. In the second e-survey, participants were asked to prioritize the questions. Finally, two priority-setting partnership workshops were used to formulate a top-10 list. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A top-25 and top-10 list of research questions related to atraumatic shoulder pain. RESULTS: Initially, 297 participants submitted 1080 potential research questions. In the second e-survey, 290 participants prioritized these questions resulting in a compilation of the top 25. Based on discussions from the workshops with 21 participants, a top 10 list was created. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In the final top 10 list, the three research questions with the highest ranking concerned 1) translating the best available knowledge into clinical practice, 2) preventing shoulder pain, and 3) identifying who benefits from surgery. These questions inform future research funding and projects relating to atraumatic shoulder pain.
肩负起更有意义的肩外伤性疼痛研究议程:优先事项设定研究
重要性:肩部外伤性疼痛给社会和个人带来了沉重负担。越来越需要患者和其他利益相关者参与制定研究议程。目标:利用肩外伤性疼痛患者、医疗从业人员及其亲属的意见来确定研究问题。设计、设置和参与者:这项确定研究重点的研究采用了詹姆斯-林德联盟(JLA)最初制定的修改方法。整个过程包括六个阶段(启动、咨询、整理、优先排序、验证和报告),其中包括两次电子调查和两次独立的虚拟研讨会。数据收集从 2021 年 6 月开始,至 2023 年 6 月结束。我们的研究对象包括肩关节创伤性疼痛患者、患者亲属、肩关节疼痛的医护人员以及在该领域开展研究的研究人员。调查:第一份电子调查包括基本的人口统计学问题以及提交至少一个、最多五个潜在研究问题的可能性。在主题分析的基础上,将问题排列成主题和相关问题。在第二次电子调查中,要求参与者对问题进行优先排序。最后,通过两次确定优先次序的合作研讨会,拟定了一份前十名清单。主要成果和措施:与肩外伤性疼痛相关的前 25 个研究问题和前 10 个研究问题清单。结果:最初,297 名参与者提交了 1080 个潜在研究问题。在第二次电子调查中,290 名参与者对这些问题进行了优先排序,最终汇编出前 25 个问题。根据 21 位参与者在研讨会上的讨论,得出了前 10 大问题清单。结论和意义:在最终的前 10 名名单中,排名最高的三个研究问题分别涉及:1)将现有的最佳知识转化为临床实践;2)预防肩痛;3)确定手术受益人群。这些问题为今后有关肩外伤性疼痛的研究经费和项目提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信