Geospatial Analysis of the Association between Medicaid Ex-pansion, Minimum Wage Policies, and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Prevalence in the United States

Abolfazl Mollalo, Sara Knox, Jessica Meng, Andreana Benitez, Leslie A. Lenert, Alexander V. Alekseyenko
{"title":"Geospatial Analysis of the Association between Medicaid Ex-pansion, Minimum Wage Policies, and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Prevalence in the United States","authors":"Abolfazl Mollalo, Sara Knox, Jessica Meng, Andreana Benitez, Leslie A. Lenert, Alexander V. Alekseyenko","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.10.24313418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies indicate that improved healthcare access through Medicaid expansion and alleviation of socioeconomic stressors via higher minimum wages improved health outcomes. This study investigates the spatial relationships between the Medicaid expansion, minimum wage policy, and AD dementia prevalence across the US. We employed the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic to identify hotspots and cold spots of AD dementia prevalence at the county level. We compared these locations with the overall social vulnerability index (SVI) scores and assessed the proportion of hot and cold spots at the state level based on Medicaid expansion and minimum wage status. Most vulnerable SVI quartile (Q4) had the highest number of hotspots (n=311, 64.8%), while the least vulnerable quartile (Q1) had the fewest hotspots (n=22, 4.6%) (Chis-squared=967;R2=307.41, P<0.01). States that adopted Medicaid expansion had a significantly lower proportion of hotspots compared to non-adopting states (P<0.05), and the non-adopting states had significantly higher odds of having hotspots than adopting states (OR=2.58, 95% CI: 2.04-3.26, P<0.001). Conversely, the non-adopting states had significantly lower odds of having cold spots compared to the adopting states (OR=0.24, 95% CI: 0.19-0.32, P<0.01). States with minimum wage levels at or below the federal level showed significantly higher odds of having hotspots than states with a minimum wage above the federal level (OR=1.94, 95% CI: 1.51-2.49, P<0.01). Our findings suggest significant disparities in AD dementia prevalence related to socioeconomic and policy factors and lay the groundwork for future causal analyses.","PeriodicalId":501386,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Policy","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.10.24313418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies indicate that improved healthcare access through Medicaid expansion and alleviation of socioeconomic stressors via higher minimum wages improved health outcomes. This study investigates the spatial relationships between the Medicaid expansion, minimum wage policy, and AD dementia prevalence across the US. We employed the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic to identify hotspots and cold spots of AD dementia prevalence at the county level. We compared these locations with the overall social vulnerability index (SVI) scores and assessed the proportion of hot and cold spots at the state level based on Medicaid expansion and minimum wage status. Most vulnerable SVI quartile (Q4) had the highest number of hotspots (n=311, 64.8%), while the least vulnerable quartile (Q1) had the fewest hotspots (n=22, 4.6%) (Chis-squared=967;R2=307.41, P<0.01). States that adopted Medicaid expansion had a significantly lower proportion of hotspots compared to non-adopting states (P<0.05), and the non-adopting states had significantly higher odds of having hotspots than adopting states (OR=2.58, 95% CI: 2.04-3.26, P<0.001). Conversely, the non-adopting states had significantly lower odds of having cold spots compared to the adopting states (OR=0.24, 95% CI: 0.19-0.32, P<0.01). States with minimum wage levels at or below the federal level showed significantly higher odds of having hotspots than states with a minimum wage above the federal level (OR=1.94, 95% CI: 1.51-2.49, P<0.01). Our findings suggest significant disparities in AD dementia prevalence related to socioeconomic and policy factors and lay the groundwork for future causal analyses.
对美国医疗补助扩展、最低工资政策和阿尔茨海默病痴呆症患病率之间关系的地理空间分析
以往的研究表明,通过扩大医疗补助计划来改善医疗保健的可及性,以及通过提高最低工资来减轻社会经济压力,都能改善健康状况。本研究调查了美国各地医疗补助扩展、最低工资政策和注意力缺失性痴呆症发病率之间的空间关系。我们采用 Getis-Ord Gi* 统计法,在县一级识别出注意力缺失性痴呆症发病率的热点和冷点。我们将这些地点与总体社会脆弱性指数(SVI)得分进行了比较,并根据医疗补助计划的扩展和最低工资状况评估了州一级热点和冷点的比例。最脆弱的 SVI 四分位数(Q4)的热点数量最多(n=311,64.8%),而最不脆弱的四分位数(Q1)的热点数量最少(n=22,4.6%)(Chis-squared=967;R2=307.41, P<0.01)。与未采用医疗补助扩展方案的州相比,采用医疗补助扩展方案的州的热点比例明显较低(P<0.05),未采用医疗补助扩展方案的州出现热点的几率明显高于采用医疗补助扩展方案的州(OR=2.58,95% CI:2.04-3.26,P<0.001)。相反,未采用该指标的州与采用该指标的州相比,出现冷点的几率明显较低(OR=0.24,95% CI:0.19-0.32,P<0.01)。最低工资水平为联邦水平或低于联邦水平的州出现热点的几率明显高于最低工资水平高于联邦水平的州(OR=1.94,95% CI:1.51-2.49,P<0.01)。我们的研究结果表明,注意力缺失性痴呆症发病率的显著差异与社会经济和政策因素有关,并为未来的因果分析奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信