Unraveling Perceived Ostracism: The Role of Antagonistic Traits and Attachment Orientation.

Daniel Waldeck,Eryn Berman-Roberts,Chris Smyth,Paolo Riva,James Adie,Andrew John Holliman,Ian Tyndall
{"title":"Unraveling Perceived Ostracism: The Role of Antagonistic Traits and Attachment Orientation.","authors":"Daniel Waldeck,Eryn Berman-Roberts,Chris Smyth,Paolo Riva,James Adie,Andrew John Holliman,Ian Tyndall","doi":"10.1080/00223980.2024.2396837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perceived ostracism (e.g., feeling ignored and excluded) can lead to psychological distress. There has been little empirical research into the types (profiles) of people more likely to perceive ostracism. The present study (N = 604) used latent class analysis (LCA) to (a) explore classes based on antagonistic traits (narcissism, machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism)while controlling for attachment orientation (attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance) and (b) examine whether such classes could reliably differentiate levels of self-reported perceived ostracism. We extracted five classes: (a) Average Low, (b) the Non-Antagonisers, (c) Average High, (d) Spiteful Manipulators, and (e) the High Antagonisers. Those in the High Antagonisers class reported significantly higher levels of perceived ostracism compared to all other classes. No other differences between classes were observed. There were also significant positive relationships for avoidant and anxious attachment on perceived ostracism, respectively. This study provides new insight into the profiles of individuals who may be more likely to perceive ostracism. However, further research is needed to explore the association between personality and perceived ostracism. Researchers may consider measuring the potential outcomes following perceived ostracism for such groups and/or design potential interventions for those at risk of such experiences.","PeriodicalId":501683,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2024.2396837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perceived ostracism (e.g., feeling ignored and excluded) can lead to psychological distress. There has been little empirical research into the types (profiles) of people more likely to perceive ostracism. The present study (N = 604) used latent class analysis (LCA) to (a) explore classes based on antagonistic traits (narcissism, machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism)while controlling for attachment orientation (attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance) and (b) examine whether such classes could reliably differentiate levels of self-reported perceived ostracism. We extracted five classes: (a) Average Low, (b) the Non-Antagonisers, (c) Average High, (d) Spiteful Manipulators, and (e) the High Antagonisers. Those in the High Antagonisers class reported significantly higher levels of perceived ostracism compared to all other classes. No other differences between classes were observed. There were also significant positive relationships for avoidant and anxious attachment on perceived ostracism, respectively. This study provides new insight into the profiles of individuals who may be more likely to perceive ostracism. However, further research is needed to explore the association between personality and perceived ostracism. Researchers may consider measuring the potential outcomes following perceived ostracism for such groups and/or design potential interventions for those at risk of such experiences.
解读感知到的排斥:对立特质和依恋取向的作用。
被排斥感(例如,感觉被忽视和排斥)会导致心理困扰。关于更容易感受到排斥的人群类型(特征)的实证研究还很少。本研究(N = 604)使用潜类分析法(LCA):(a) 在控制依恋取向(依恋焦虑和依恋回避)的情况下,探索基于对抗性特质(自恋、大男子主义、变态心理和虐待狂)的类别;(b) 检验这些类别是否能可靠地区分自我报告的感知到的排斥程度。我们提取了五个等级:(a)平均低度排斥者,(b)非排斥者,(c)平均高度排斥者,(d)恶意操纵者,以及(e)高度排斥者。与所有其他组别相比,"高度对抗者 "组别中的受访者认为自己受到排斥的程度明显更高。没有观察到班级之间存在其他差异。此外,回避型依恋和焦虑型依恋也分别与排挤感有明显的正相关关系。这项研究为我们提供了一个新的视角,让我们了解哪些人更容易感受到排斥。然而,还需要进一步的研究来探讨人格与感知到的排斥之间的关系。研究人员可以考虑测量这些群体在感知到被排斥后可能产生的结果,以及/或者为那些有这种经历风险的人设计潜在的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信