Does Knee Arthroplasty Have a Beneficial Effect on Return to Work in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis who Receive Long-Term Disability Benefits in the Netherlands?

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Titi J. Cheng, Karen Nieuwenhuijsen, P. Paul F. M. Kuijer
{"title":"Does Knee Arthroplasty Have a Beneficial Effect on Return to Work in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis who Receive Long-Term Disability Benefits in the Netherlands?","authors":"Titi J. Cheng, Karen Nieuwenhuijsen, P. Paul F. M. Kuijer","doi":"10.1007/s10926-024-10234-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Optimal timing of knee arthroplasty (KA) is complex: operating at a younger age increases life time risk of revision, while delay results in an increased risk of job loss. This study evaluates whether disability benefits recipients due to knee osteoarthritis have an increased odds of returning to work (RTW) following KA.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study was performed among long-term disability benefits recipients due to knee osteoarthritis using data of the Dutch Employee Insurance Agency. Logistic regression assessed whether recipients with KA had a higher odds of RTW in 10 years following start of disability benefits, compared to those without KA.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 159 participants were included. During 10-year follow up, 42% had received KA and 37% had returned to work. No association was observed between KA and RTW (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.62–3.12). Prognostic factors for RTW were being the main breadwinner (OR 7.93, 95% CI 2.95–21.32) and classification as 100% work disability (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09–0.45).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>KA has no beneficial effect on RTW among patients with knee osteoarthritis granted long-term disability in the Netherlands. For RTW, KA is probably best performed within the two years of paid sick leave before long-term disability is assessed in the Netherlands.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10234-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Optimal timing of knee arthroplasty (KA) is complex: operating at a younger age increases life time risk of revision, while delay results in an increased risk of job loss. This study evaluates whether disability benefits recipients due to knee osteoarthritis have an increased odds of returning to work (RTW) following KA.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed among long-term disability benefits recipients due to knee osteoarthritis using data of the Dutch Employee Insurance Agency. Logistic regression assessed whether recipients with KA had a higher odds of RTW in 10 years following start of disability benefits, compared to those without KA.

Results

A total of 159 participants were included. During 10-year follow up, 42% had received KA and 37% had returned to work. No association was observed between KA and RTW (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.62–3.12). Prognostic factors for RTW were being the main breadwinner (OR 7.93, 95% CI 2.95–21.32) and classification as 100% work disability (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09–0.45).

Conclusions

KA has no beneficial effect on RTW among patients with knee osteoarthritis granted long-term disability in the Netherlands. For RTW, KA is probably best performed within the two years of paid sick leave before long-term disability is assessed in the Netherlands.

Abstract Image

在荷兰,膝关节置换术对领取长期残疾津贴的膝关节骨性关节炎患者重返工作岗位有好处吗?
目的膝关节置换术(KA)的最佳时机非常复杂:在较年轻时手术会增加终身翻修的风险,而延迟手术则会增加失业的风险。本研究评估了因膝关节骨性关节炎而领取伤残津贴者在接受膝关节置换术后重返工作岗位(RTW)的几率是否会增加。方法 使用荷兰雇员保险机构的数据,对因膝关节骨性关节炎而领取长期伤残津贴者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。Logistic 回归评估了与未患膝关节骨关节炎的人相比,患膝关节骨关节炎的人在开始领取残疾津贴后 10 年内重返工作岗位的几率是否更高。在 10 年的随访中,42% 的人领取了伤残津贴,37% 的人重返工作岗位。KA与复工之间没有关联(OR 1.39,95% CI 0.62-3.12)。荷兰长期残疾的膝关节骨性关节炎患者中,结论KA对复工无益处(OR 7.93,95% CI 2.95-21.32)。在荷兰,就复工而言,最好在评估长期残疾之前的两年带薪病假期间进行 KA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law.  A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信