Investigating Mode Effects in Interviewer Variances Using Two Representative Multi-mode Surveys

Wenshan Yu, Michael R. Elliott, Trivellore E. Raghunathan
{"title":"Investigating Mode Effects in Interviewer Variances Using Two Representative Multi-mode Surveys","authors":"Wenshan Yu, Michael R. Elliott, Trivellore E. Raghunathan","doi":"arxiv-2408.11874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines whether interviewer variances remain consistent across\ndifferent modes in mixed-mode studies, using data from two distinct designs. In\nthe first design, when interviewers are responsible for either face-to-face or\ntelephone mode, we examine whether there are mode differences in interviewer\nvariances for 1) sensitive political questions, 2) international items, 3) and\nitem missing indicators on international items, using the Arab Barometer wave 6\nJordan data. In the second design, we draw on Health and Retirement Study (HRS)\n2016 core survey data to examine the question on three topics when interviewers\nare responsible for both modes. The topics cover 1) the CESD depression scale,\n2) interviewer observations, and 3) the physical activity scale. To account for\nthe lack of interpenetrated designs in both data sources, we include\nrespondent-level covariates in our models. We find significant differences in\ninterviewer variances on one item (twelve items in total) in the Arab Barometer\nstudy; whereas for HRS, the results are three out of eighteen. Overall, we find\nthe magnitude of the interviewer variances larger in FTF than TEL on sensitive\nitems. We conduct simulations to understand the power to detect mode effects in\nthe typically modest interviewer sample sizes.","PeriodicalId":501172,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.11874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines whether interviewer variances remain consistent across different modes in mixed-mode studies, using data from two distinct designs. In the first design, when interviewers are responsible for either face-to-face or telephone mode, we examine whether there are mode differences in interviewer variances for 1) sensitive political questions, 2) international items, 3) and item missing indicators on international items, using the Arab Barometer wave 6 Jordan data. In the second design, we draw on Health and Retirement Study (HRS) 2016 core survey data to examine the question on three topics when interviewers are responsible for both modes. The topics cover 1) the CESD depression scale, 2) interviewer observations, and 3) the physical activity scale. To account for the lack of interpenetrated designs in both data sources, we include respondent-level covariates in our models. We find significant differences in interviewer variances on one item (twelve items in total) in the Arab Barometer study; whereas for HRS, the results are three out of eighteen. Overall, we find the magnitude of the interviewer variances larger in FTF than TEL on sensitive items. We conduct simulations to understand the power to detect mode effects in the typically modest interviewer sample sizes.
利用两项具有代表性的多模式调查研究受访者差异中的模式效应
本研究利用两种不同设计的数据,考察了在混合模式研究中,不同模式下的访问员差异是否保持一致。在第一种设计中,当访问员负责面对面或电话模式时,我们利用阿拉伯晴雨表第 6 波约旦数据,考察了 1)敏感政治问题、2)国际项目、3)国际项目缺失指标的访问员差异是否存在模式差异。在第二种设计中,我们利用健康与退休研究(HRS)2016 年的核心调查数据,考察了访谈员同时负责两种模式时三个主题的问题。这些题目包括:1)CESD抑郁量表;2)访问者观察;3)体力活动量表。为了考虑到两种数据源中缺乏相互渗透的设计,我们在模型中加入了受访者水平的协变量。我们发现,在阿拉伯晴雨表研究中,一个项目(共 12 个项目)的受访者方差存在显著差异;而在人力资源调查中,18 个项目中有 3 个项目的受访者方差存在显著差异。总体而言,我们发现在敏感项目上,FTF 的受访者方差幅度大于 TEL。我们进行了模拟,以了解在通常规模不大的受访者样本中检测模式效应的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信