Band configurations and seasonality influence the predictions of common boreal tree species using UAS image data

Abstract

Key message

Data acquisition of remote sensing products is an essential component of modern forest inventories. The quality and properties of optical remote sensing data are further emphasised in tree species-specific inventories, where the discrimination of different tree species is based on differences in their spectral properties. Furthermore, phenology affects the spectral properties of both evergreen and deciduous trees through seasons. These confounding factors in both sensor configuration and timing of data acquisition can result in unexpectedly complicated situations if not taken into consideration. This paper examines how the timing of data acquisition and sensor properties influence the prediction of tree species proportions and volumes in a boreal forest area dominated by Norway spruce and Scots pine, with a smaller presence of deciduous trees.

Context

The effectiveness of remote sensing for vegetation mapping depends on the properties of the survey area, mapping objectives and sensor configuration.

Aims

The objective of this study was to investigate the plot-level relationship between seasonality and different optical band configurations and prediction performance of common boreal tree species. The study was conducted on a 40-ha study area with a systematically sampled circular field plots.

Methods

Tree species proportions (0–1) and volumes (m³ ha⁻¹) were predicted with repeated remote sensing data collections in three stages of the growing season: prior (spring), during (summer) and end (autumn). Sensor band configurations included conventional RGB and multispectral (MS). The importance of different wavelengths (red, green, blue, near-infrared and red-edge) and predictive performance of the different band configurations were analysed using zero–one-inflated beta regression and Gaussian process regression.

Results

Prediction errors of broadleaves were most affected by band configuration, MS data resulting in lower prediction errors in all seasons. The MS data exhibited slightly lower prediction errors with summer data acquisition compared to other seasons, whereas this period was found to be less suitable for RGB data.

Conclusion

The MS data was found to be much less affected by seasonality than the RGB data. Spring was found to be the least optimal season to collect MS and RGB data for tree species-specific predictions.