The Hydrologic Mitigation Effectiveness of Bioretention Basins in an Urban Area Prone to Flash Flooding

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Water Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.3390/w16182597
Brian G. Laub, Eugene Von Bon, Lani May, Mel Garcia
{"title":"The Hydrologic Mitigation Effectiveness of Bioretention Basins in an Urban Area Prone to Flash Flooding","authors":"Brian G. Laub, Eugene Von Bon, Lani May, Mel Garcia","doi":"10.3390/w16182597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The hydrologic performance and cost-effectiveness of green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) in climates with highly variable precipitation is an important subject in urban stormwater management. We measured the hydrologic effects of two bioretention basins in San Antonio, Texas, a growing city in a region prone to flash flooding. Pre-construction, inflow, and outflow hydrographs of the basins were compared to test whether the basins reduced peak flow magnitude and altered the metrics of flashiness, including rate of flow rise and fall. We determined the construction and annual maintenance cost of one basin and whether precipitation magnitude and antecedent moisture conditions altered hydrologic mitigation effectiveness. The basins reduced flashiness when comparing inflow to outflow and pre-construction to outflow hydrographs, including reducing peak flow magnitudes by >80% on average. Basin performance was not strongly affected by precipitation magnitude or antecedent conditions, though the range of precipitation magnitudes sampled was limited. Construction costs were higher than previously reported projects, but annual maintenance costs were similar and no higher than costs to maintain an equivalent landscaped area. Results indicate that bioretention basins effectively mitigate peak flow and flashiness, even in flash-flood-prone environments, which should benefit downstream ecosystems. The results provide a unique assessment of bioretention basin performance in flash-flood-prone environments and can inform the optimization of cost-effectiveness when implementing GSI at watershed scales in regions with current or future similar precipitation regimes.","PeriodicalId":23788,"journal":{"name":"Water","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182597","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The hydrologic performance and cost-effectiveness of green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) in climates with highly variable precipitation is an important subject in urban stormwater management. We measured the hydrologic effects of two bioretention basins in San Antonio, Texas, a growing city in a region prone to flash flooding. Pre-construction, inflow, and outflow hydrographs of the basins were compared to test whether the basins reduced peak flow magnitude and altered the metrics of flashiness, including rate of flow rise and fall. We determined the construction and annual maintenance cost of one basin and whether precipitation magnitude and antecedent moisture conditions altered hydrologic mitigation effectiveness. The basins reduced flashiness when comparing inflow to outflow and pre-construction to outflow hydrographs, including reducing peak flow magnitudes by >80% on average. Basin performance was not strongly affected by precipitation magnitude or antecedent conditions, though the range of precipitation magnitudes sampled was limited. Construction costs were higher than previously reported projects, but annual maintenance costs were similar and no higher than costs to maintain an equivalent landscaped area. Results indicate that bioretention basins effectively mitigate peak flow and flashiness, even in flash-flood-prone environments, which should benefit downstream ecosystems. The results provide a unique assessment of bioretention basin performance in flash-flood-prone environments and can inform the optimization of cost-effectiveness when implementing GSI at watershed scales in regions with current or future similar precipitation regimes.
易受山洪暴发影响的城市地区生物蓄水池的水文缓解效果
在降水量变化很大的气候条件下,绿色雨水基础设施(GSI)的水文性能和成本效益是城市雨水管理的一个重要课题。我们测量了德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥市两个生物滞留池的水文效果,圣安东尼奥市是一个易受山洪暴发影响的成长型城市。我们比较了生物蓄水池施工前、流入和流出的水文图,以检验生物蓄水池是否降低了峰值流量,是否改变了山洪暴发的指标,包括流量上升和下降的速度。我们确定了一个流域的建设和年度维护成本,以及降水量和先期湿度条件是否会改变水文缓解效果。在比较流入与流出以及施工前与流出的水文图时,这些流域都降低了闪蒸度,包括平均降低了 80% 以上的峰值流量。虽然取样的降水量范围有限,但流域的性能并未受到降水量或先决条件的强烈影响。建造成本高于之前报告的项目,但每年的维护成本类似,不高于维护同等景观区域的成本。结果表明,生物滞留池即使在易发山洪的环境中也能有效缓解峰值流量和山洪暴发,这对下游生态系统应该是有益的。这些结果对生物蓄水池在易发山洪环境中的性能进行了独特的评估,并可为当前或未来降水量相似的地区在流域范围内实施 GSI 时优化成本效益提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water
Water WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
3491
审稿时长
19.85 days
期刊介绍: Water (ISSN 2073-4441) is an international and cross-disciplinary scholarly journal covering all aspects of water including water science and technology, and the hydrology, ecology and management of water resources. It publishes regular research papers, critical reviews and short communications, and there is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles. Computed data or files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信