Fully Characterizing Lossy Catalytic Computation

Marten Folkertsma, Ian Mertz, Florian Speelman, Quinten Tupker
{"title":"Fully Characterizing Lossy Catalytic Computation","authors":"Marten Folkertsma, Ian Mertz, Florian Speelman, Quinten Tupker","doi":"arxiv-2409.05046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A catalytic machine is a model of computation where a traditional\nspace-bounded machine is augmented with an additional, significantly larger,\n\"catalytic\" tape, which, while being available as a work tape, has the caveat\nof being initialized with an arbitrary string, which must be preserved at the\nend of the computation. Despite this restriction, catalytic machines have been\nshown to have surprising additional power; a logspace machine with a polynomial\nlength catalytic tape, known as catalytic logspace ($CL$), can compute problems\nwhich are believed to be impossible for $L$. A fundamental question of the model is whether the catalytic condition, of\nleaving the catalytic tape in its exact original configuration, is robust to\nminor deviations. This study was initialized by Gupta et al. (2024), who\ndefined lossy catalytic logspace ($LCL[e]$) as a variant of $CL$ where we allow\nup to $e$ errors when resetting the catalytic tape. They showed that $LCL[e] =\nCL$ for any $e = O(1)$, which remains the frontier of our understanding. In this work we completely characterize lossy catalytic space\n($LCSPACE[s,c,e]$) in terms of ordinary catalytic space ($CSPACE[s,c]$). We\nshow that $$LCSPACE[s,c,e] = CSPACE[\\Theta(s + e \\log c), \\Theta(c)]$$ In other\nwords, allowing $e$ errors on a catalytic tape of length $c$ is equivalent, up\nto a constant stretch, to an equivalent errorless catalytic machine with an\nadditional $e \\log c$ bits of ordinary working memory. As a consequence, we show that for any $e$, $LCL[e] = CL$ implies $SPACE[e\n\\log n] \\subseteq ZPP$, thus giving a barrier to any improvement beyond\n$LCL[O(1)] = CL$. We also show equivalent results for non-deterministic and\nrandomized catalytic space.","PeriodicalId":501024,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.05046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A catalytic machine is a model of computation where a traditional space-bounded machine is augmented with an additional, significantly larger, "catalytic" tape, which, while being available as a work tape, has the caveat of being initialized with an arbitrary string, which must be preserved at the end of the computation. Despite this restriction, catalytic machines have been shown to have surprising additional power; a logspace machine with a polynomial length catalytic tape, known as catalytic logspace ($CL$), can compute problems which are believed to be impossible for $L$. A fundamental question of the model is whether the catalytic condition, of leaving the catalytic tape in its exact original configuration, is robust to minor deviations. This study was initialized by Gupta et al. (2024), who defined lossy catalytic logspace ($LCL[e]$) as a variant of $CL$ where we allow up to $e$ errors when resetting the catalytic tape. They showed that $LCL[e] = CL$ for any $e = O(1)$, which remains the frontier of our understanding. In this work we completely characterize lossy catalytic space ($LCSPACE[s,c,e]$) in terms of ordinary catalytic space ($CSPACE[s,c]$). We show that $$LCSPACE[s,c,e] = CSPACE[\Theta(s + e \log c), \Theta(c)]$$ In other words, allowing $e$ errors on a catalytic tape of length $c$ is equivalent, up to a constant stretch, to an equivalent errorless catalytic machine with an additional $e \log c$ bits of ordinary working memory. As a consequence, we show that for any $e$, $LCL[e] = CL$ implies $SPACE[e \log n] \subseteq ZPP$, thus giving a barrier to any improvement beyond $LCL[O(1)] = CL$. We also show equivalent results for non-deterministic and randomized catalytic space.
全面描述有损催化计算
催化机器是一种计算模型,它在传统的有空间限制的机器上增加了一个额外的、大得多的 "催化 "磁带,这个 "催化 "磁带虽然可以作为工作磁带,但有一个注意事项,即它必须用一个任意字符串初始化,而这个字符串在计算结束时必须保留。尽管有这样的限制,催化机器仍被证明具有惊人的额外能力;具有多项式长度催化磁带的对数空间机器,即催化对数空间($CL$),可以计算被认为对$L$来说不可能的问题。该模型的一个基本问题是,将催化带保持在完全原始的配置上这一催化条件,是否对微小偏差具有稳健性。这项研究是由古普塔等人(2024 年)发起的,他们把有损催化对数空间($LCL[e]$)定义为$CL$ 的一种变体,在这种变体中,我们允许在重置催化磁带时最多有 $e$ 的误差。他们证明,对于任意 $e = O(1)$,$LCL[e]=CL$ 仍然是我们理解的前沿。在这项工作中,我们用普通催化空间($CSPACE[s,c]$)完全描述了有损催化空间($LCSPACE[s,c,e]$)的特征。换句话说,在长度为 $c$ 的催化磁带上允许 $e$ 的错误,在一个恒定的伸展范围内,等价于一个等价的无差错催化机器,它有额外的 $e \log c$ 位的普通工作存储器。因此,我们证明,对于任何 $e$,$LCL[e] = CL$ 意味着 $SPACE[e\log n] \subseteq ZPP$,从而为任何超越$LCL[O(1)] = CL$ 的改进提供了障碍。我们还展示了非确定性和随机催化空间的等效结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信