If a fish comes out of the river and speaks, we should believe it: South African perspective on fish kills

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Matthew J. Burnett, Gordon C. O'Brien, Andrew Blackmore, Melissa Wade, Colleen T. Downs
{"title":"If a fish comes out of the river and speaks, we should believe it: South African perspective on fish kills","authors":"Matthew J. Burnett, Gordon C. O'Brien, Andrew Blackmore, Melissa Wade, Colleen T. Downs","doi":"10.1002/rra.4359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In South Africa, fish kill events are increasing in frequency because of multiple stressors associated with managing natural resources. Despite the ecosystem services associated with fish, South Africa's progressive legislation towards environmental protection seems to negate the management of fish kills. In this study, we provide an overview of reports and regulations associated with acute pollution spills resulting in fish kill events in South Africa. In addition, we highlight the implication of these using a fish kill event from 2019 on the Msunduzi River, South Africa, as a case study. The fish kill on the Msunduzi River showed a decline in relative abundance by up to 41%, and its ecological condition was already impaired by poor management. The poor condition of the Msunduzi River has jeopardised the recovery of the fish populations, and intervention is needed to restore the fish population that includes species red‐listed as vulnerable by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature. We found that despite the severity of fish kills and the detriment to the fish fauna, including near‐threatened species, there is a general apathy, incapacity and lack of knowledge on managing fish kills in South Africa. In addition, although several legislated Acts have good intentions for protecting nature, they do not align and show that a fish kill is an afterthought rather than a need to prevent. Poor management practices have exacerbated this in an already stressed state from excessive use of environmental water. As a way forward, the alignment of the various Acts associated with various ministerial departments in South Africa is needed so that better protection of the environment may occur. Finally, we argue that the African proverb ‘<jats:italic>If the fish comes out of the river to tell you that the crocodile has one eye, you should believe it</jats:italic>’ is not considered when managing water resources and that with the present ecological state and water resource use there may be no fish to ‘come out of the water’ warning us that our water is unsafe even for human consumption and use.","PeriodicalId":21513,"journal":{"name":"River Research and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"River Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In South Africa, fish kill events are increasing in frequency because of multiple stressors associated with managing natural resources. Despite the ecosystem services associated with fish, South Africa's progressive legislation towards environmental protection seems to negate the management of fish kills. In this study, we provide an overview of reports and regulations associated with acute pollution spills resulting in fish kill events in South Africa. In addition, we highlight the implication of these using a fish kill event from 2019 on the Msunduzi River, South Africa, as a case study. The fish kill on the Msunduzi River showed a decline in relative abundance by up to 41%, and its ecological condition was already impaired by poor management. The poor condition of the Msunduzi River has jeopardised the recovery of the fish populations, and intervention is needed to restore the fish population that includes species red‐listed as vulnerable by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature. We found that despite the severity of fish kills and the detriment to the fish fauna, including near‐threatened species, there is a general apathy, incapacity and lack of knowledge on managing fish kills in South Africa. In addition, although several legislated Acts have good intentions for protecting nature, they do not align and show that a fish kill is an afterthought rather than a need to prevent. Poor management practices have exacerbated this in an already stressed state from excessive use of environmental water. As a way forward, the alignment of the various Acts associated with various ministerial departments in South Africa is needed so that better protection of the environment may occur. Finally, we argue that the African proverb ‘If the fish comes out of the river to tell you that the crocodile has one eye, you should believe it’ is not considered when managing water resources and that with the present ecological state and water resource use there may be no fish to ‘come out of the water’ warning us that our water is unsafe even for human consumption and use.
如果有鱼从河里出来说话,我们就应该相信它:南非对鱼类死亡的看法
在南非,由于与自然资源管理相关的多重压力,鱼类死亡事件越来越频繁。尽管鱼类可为生态系统提供服务,但南非在环境保护方面的渐进式立法似乎否定了对鱼类死亡事件的管理。在本研究中,我们概述了与南非导致鱼类死亡事件的急性污染泄漏相关的报告和法规。此外,我们还以南非 Msunduzi 河 2019 年发生的一起鱼类死亡事件为案例,强调了这些事件的影响。Msunduzi河的鱼类死亡事件表明,鱼类的相对丰度下降了41%,其生态状况已经因管理不善而受到损害。姆松杜兹河的恶劣条件已危及鱼类种群的恢复,需要采取干预措施来恢复鱼类种群,其中包括被国际自然保护联盟列为易危物种的鱼类。我们发现,尽管鱼类死亡情况严重,对鱼类动物(包括濒临灭绝的物种)造成了损害,但南非在管理鱼类死亡方面普遍存在冷漠、无能和缺乏知识的现象。此外,尽管几项立法具有保护自然的良好意愿,但它们并不一致,表明鱼类死亡是事后的想法,而不是需要预防的。在本已因过度使用环境用水而压力重重的情况下,管理不善的做法加剧了这一问题。作为前进的方向,需要对与南非各部委相关的各种法案进行协调,以便更好地保护环境。最后,我们认为,在管理水资源时没有考虑到非洲谚语 "如果鱼从河里出来告诉你鳄鱼只有一只眼睛,你应该相信它",在目前的生态状况和水资源使用情况下,可能不会有鱼 "从水里出来 "警告我们,我们的水不安全,甚至不能供人类消费和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
River Research and Applications
River Research and Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: River Research and Applications , previously published as Regulated Rivers: Research and Management (1987-2001), is an international journal dedicated to the promotion of basic and applied scientific research on rivers. The journal publishes original scientific and technical papers on biological, ecological, geomorphological, hydrological, engineering and geographical aspects related to rivers in both the developed and developing world. Papers showing how basic studies and new science can be of use in applied problems associated with river management, regulation and restoration are encouraged as is interdisciplinary research concerned directly or indirectly with river management problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信