User Preferences for Large Language Model versus Template-Based Explanations of Movie Recommendations: A Pilot Study

Julien Albert, Martin Balfroid, Miriam Doh, Jeremie Bogaert, Luca La Fisca, Liesbet De Vos, Bryan Renard, Vincent Stragier, Emmanuel Jean
{"title":"User Preferences for Large Language Model versus Template-Based Explanations of Movie Recommendations: A Pilot Study","authors":"Julien Albert, Martin Balfroid, Miriam Doh, Jeremie Bogaert, Luca La Fisca, Liesbet De Vos, Bryan Renard, Vincent Stragier, Emmanuel Jean","doi":"arxiv-2409.06297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recommender systems have become integral to our digital experiences, from\nonline shopping to streaming platforms. Still, the rationale behind their\nsuggestions often remains opaque to users. While some systems employ a\ngraph-based approach, offering inherent explainability through paths\nassociating recommended items and seed items, non-experts could not easily\nunderstand these explanations. A popular alternative is to convert graph-based\nexplanations into textual ones using a template and an algorithm, which we\ndenote here as ''template-based'' explanations. Yet, these can sometimes come\nacross as impersonal or uninspiring. A novel method would be to employ large\nlanguage models (LLMs) for this purpose, which we denote as ''LLM-based''. To\nassess the effectiveness of LLMs in generating more resonant explanations, we\nconducted a pilot study with 25 participants. They were presented with three\nexplanations: (1) traditional template-based, (2) LLM-based rephrasing of the\ntemplate output, and (3) purely LLM-based explanations derived from the\ngraph-based explanations. Although subject to high variance, preliminary\nfindings suggest that LLM-based explanations may provide a richer and more\nengaging user experience, further aligning with user expectations. This study\nsheds light on the potential limitations of current explanation methods and\noffers promising directions for leveraging large language models to improve\nuser satisfaction and trust in recommender systems.","PeriodicalId":501541,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recommender systems have become integral to our digital experiences, from online shopping to streaming platforms. Still, the rationale behind their suggestions often remains opaque to users. While some systems employ a graph-based approach, offering inherent explainability through paths associating recommended items and seed items, non-experts could not easily understand these explanations. A popular alternative is to convert graph-based explanations into textual ones using a template and an algorithm, which we denote here as ''template-based'' explanations. Yet, these can sometimes come across as impersonal or uninspiring. A novel method would be to employ large language models (LLMs) for this purpose, which we denote as ''LLM-based''. To assess the effectiveness of LLMs in generating more resonant explanations, we conducted a pilot study with 25 participants. They were presented with three explanations: (1) traditional template-based, (2) LLM-based rephrasing of the template output, and (3) purely LLM-based explanations derived from the graph-based explanations. Although subject to high variance, preliminary findings suggest that LLM-based explanations may provide a richer and more engaging user experience, further aligning with user expectations. This study sheds light on the potential limitations of current explanation methods and offers promising directions for leveraging large language models to improve user satisfaction and trust in recommender systems.
用户对大语言模型和基于模板的电影推荐解释的偏好:试点研究
从在线购物到流媒体平台,推荐系统已经成为我们数字体验中不可或缺的一部分。然而,用户对其推荐背后的原理往往并不了解。虽然有些系统采用基于图的方法,通过推荐项目和种子项目之间的关联路径提供内在的可解释性,但非专业人士很难理解这些解释。一种流行的替代方法是使用模板和算法将基于图的解释转换为文本解释,我们在此将其称为 "基于模板的解释"。然而,这些解释有时会显得不近人情或缺乏启发性。为此,一种新颖的方法是使用大型语言模型(LLM),我们称之为 "基于 LLM 的 "解释。为了评估 LLM 在产生更有共鸣的解释方面的有效性,我们对 25 名参与者进行了试点研究。我们向他们展示了三种解释:(1)传统的基于模板的解释;(2)基于 LLM 的模板输出重述;(3)从基于图表的解释中衍生出的纯粹基于 LLM 的解释。尽管差异很大,但初步结果表明,基于 LLM 的解释可能会提供更丰富、更吸引人的用户体验,从而进一步符合用户的期望。这项研究揭示了当前解释方法的潜在局限性,并为利用大型语言模型提高推荐系统的用户满意度和信任度提供了有希望的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信