Comparison of juvenile coral assemblages between Australia’s Coral Sea and Great Barrier Reef Marine Parks

IF 2.7 2区 生物学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Deborah Burn, Andrew S. Hoey, Chiara Pisapia, Josie F. Chandler, Cassandra A. Thompson, Morgan S. Pratchett
{"title":"Comparison of juvenile coral assemblages between Australia’s Coral Sea and Great Barrier Reef Marine Parks","authors":"Deborah Burn, Andrew S. Hoey, Chiara Pisapia, Josie F. Chandler, Cassandra A. Thompson, Morgan S. Pratchett","doi":"10.1007/s00338-024-02541-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Densities of juvenile corals (≤ 50 mm diameter) are expected to vary between geographically isolated and more spatially proximate reefs, and may constrain local recovery potential. This study compared juvenile coral densities and their relationships with local abundance of adult congenerics at geographically isolated reefs within Australia’s Coral Sea Marine Park (CSMP) versus highly connected reefs within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP). Three latitudinal regions and two habitats (reef crest and slope) were examined within both marine parks to test for spatial variation. Densities of juvenile corals in the CSMP (13.99 ± 0.72 juveniles 10 m<sup>−2</sup>) were significantly lower compared to those in the GBRMP (23.72 ± 1.86 juveniles 10 m<sup>−2</sup>). Specifically, there were significantly less <i>Acropora</i> and <i>Pocillopora</i> juveniles on the reef crest in the central CSMP compared to the GBRMP. Relationships between juvenile abundance and percent coral cover were greatest for <i>Acropora</i> and <i>Pocillopora</i> in the GBRMP. This may be due to the low range of coral cover estimates recorded in the CSMP, especially for <i>Acropora</i> (0–15%). Low juvenile coral abundance, and in particular, the lack of fast-growing juvenile corals (e.g., <i>Acropora</i>) in the Central CSMP, in combination with low cover of broodstock (particularly <i>Acropora</i>) on CSMP reefs, poses a significant constraint on post-disturbance recovery capacity, possibly attributable to isolation and limited connectivity among reefs in this region.</p>","PeriodicalId":10821,"journal":{"name":"Coral Reefs","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coral Reefs","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-024-02541-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Densities of juvenile corals (≤ 50 mm diameter) are expected to vary between geographically isolated and more spatially proximate reefs, and may constrain local recovery potential. This study compared juvenile coral densities and their relationships with local abundance of adult congenerics at geographically isolated reefs within Australia’s Coral Sea Marine Park (CSMP) versus highly connected reefs within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP). Three latitudinal regions and two habitats (reef crest and slope) were examined within both marine parks to test for spatial variation. Densities of juvenile corals in the CSMP (13.99 ± 0.72 juveniles 10 m−2) were significantly lower compared to those in the GBRMP (23.72 ± 1.86 juveniles 10 m−2). Specifically, there were significantly less Acropora and Pocillopora juveniles on the reef crest in the central CSMP compared to the GBRMP. Relationships between juvenile abundance and percent coral cover were greatest for Acropora and Pocillopora in the GBRMP. This may be due to the low range of coral cover estimates recorded in the CSMP, especially for Acropora (0–15%). Low juvenile coral abundance, and in particular, the lack of fast-growing juvenile corals (e.g., Acropora) in the Central CSMP, in combination with low cover of broodstock (particularly Acropora) on CSMP reefs, poses a significant constraint on post-disturbance recovery capacity, possibly attributable to isolation and limited connectivity among reefs in this region.

Abstract Image

澳大利亚珊瑚海和大堡礁海洋公园的幼年珊瑚组合比较
幼珊瑚(直径小于 50 毫米)的密度预计在地理上孤立的珊瑚礁和空间上更接近的珊瑚礁之间会有所不同,并可能制约当地的恢复潜力。本研究比较了澳大利亚珊瑚海海洋公园(CSMP)与大堡礁海洋公园(GBRMP)中地理位置孤立的珊瑚礁与高度相连的珊瑚礁中的幼体珊瑚密度及其与当地成体同系物丰度的关系。两个海洋公园内的三个纬度区域和两种栖息地(礁峰和斜坡)都进行了研究,以检验空间差异。与大堡礁海洋公园(23.72 ± 1.86 幼体 10 m-2)相比,CSMP 的幼体珊瑚密度(13.99 ± 0.72 幼体 10 m-2)明显较低。具体而言,与 GBRMP 相比,CSMP 中部礁峰上的 Acropora 和 Pocillopora 幼体数量明显较少。在 GBRMP 中,Acropora 和 Pocillopora 的幼体丰度与珊瑚覆盖率之间的关系最大。这可能是由于 CSMP 中记录的珊瑚覆盖率范围较低,尤其是 Acropora(0-15%)。幼体珊瑚丰度低,特别是中部 CSMP 缺乏快速生长的幼体珊瑚(如 Acropora),加之 CSMP 珊瑚礁上的幼体珊瑚(特别是 Acropora)覆盖率低,严重制约了干扰后的恢复能力,这可能归因于该区域珊瑚礁之间的隔离和有限的连通性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Coral Reefs
Coral Reefs 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Coral Reefs, the Journal of the International Coral Reef Society, presents multidisciplinary literature across the broad fields of reef studies, publishing analytical and theoretical papers on both modern and ancient reefs. These encourage the search for theories about reef structure and dynamics, and the use of experimentation, modeling, quantification and the applied sciences. Coverage includes such subject areas as population dynamics; community ecology of reef organisms; energy and nutrient flows; biogeochemical cycles; physiology of calcification; reef responses to natural and anthropogenic influences; stress markers in reef organisms; behavioural ecology; sedimentology; diagenesis; reef structure and morphology; evolutionary ecology of the reef biota; palaeoceanography of coral reefs and coral islands; reef management and its underlying disciplines; molecular biology and genetics of coral; aetiology of disease in reef-related organisms; reef responses to global change, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信