A retrospective analysis of spinal teratomas and spinal lipomas: overlaps and differences in presentation, surgical treatments, and outcomes

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hongmei Song, Mingxin Yu, Yang Song, Shuanglin Deng
{"title":"A retrospective analysis of spinal teratomas and spinal lipomas: overlaps and differences in presentation, surgical treatments, and outcomes","authors":"Hongmei Song,&nbsp;Mingxin Yu,&nbsp;Yang Song,&nbsp;Shuanglin Deng","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.08.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>Spinal teratomas and lipomas, both adult and pediatric cases, are rare diseases with many similarities, but have yet to be systematically compared.</div></div><div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>To systematically compare spinal teratomas and lipomas to optimize management.</div></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN</h3><div>Retrospective.</div></div><div><h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3><div>Symptomatic spinal teratoma and lipoma patients surgically treated at our center.</div></div><div><h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><div>Anatomical distribution, clinical manifestations, resection status, and outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Spinal teratoma and lipoma patients with complete data treated during 2008 to 2023 in our center were enrolled. Electrophysiological monitoring was routinely performed after 2012. Patient characteristics, anatomical distribution, clinical manifestations, surgical resection, and outcomes were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>We enrolled 86 teratoma patients (71 adults) and 51 lipoma patients (39 adults). Most tumors were lumbosacral lesions; cervical/thoracic involvement was more common with lipomas. Pain, the most frequent manifestation, was more common in teratomas. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 51.1% and 49% of teratomas and lipomas, respectively. Electrophysiological monitoring increased the GTR rate from 38.8% to 48.6%. Age independently predicted (OR: 1.040, 95% CI: 1.008–1.078) GTR/near-total resection (NTR). Symptom relief occurred in 81.4% teratoma patients and 64.7% lipoma patients. Recurrence/symptomatic progression occurred in 19 teratomas and 7 lipomas after a median of 95 and 115 months, respectively. Adult lipoma patients without spinal dysraphism had lower recurrence rates. GTR (HR: 0.172, 95% CI: 0.02557–0.7028) and lesion length (HR: 1.351, 95% CI: 1.138–1.607) independently predicted recurrence/progression.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>GTR should be pursued for adult/pediatric spinal teratomas and pediatric spinal lipomas. For adult spinal lipoma patients without dysraphism, conservative surgery could be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"Pages 111-126"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1529943024009835","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spinal teratomas and lipomas, both adult and pediatric cases, are rare diseases with many similarities, but have yet to be systematically compared.

PURPOSE

To systematically compare spinal teratomas and lipomas to optimize management.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Symptomatic spinal teratoma and lipoma patients surgically treated at our center.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Anatomical distribution, clinical manifestations, resection status, and outcomes.

METHODS

Spinal teratoma and lipoma patients with complete data treated during 2008 to 2023 in our center were enrolled. Electrophysiological monitoring was routinely performed after 2012. Patient characteristics, anatomical distribution, clinical manifestations, surgical resection, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

We enrolled 86 teratoma patients (71 adults) and 51 lipoma patients (39 adults). Most tumors were lumbosacral lesions; cervical/thoracic involvement was more common with lipomas. Pain, the most frequent manifestation, was more common in teratomas. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 51.1% and 49% of teratomas and lipomas, respectively. Electrophysiological monitoring increased the GTR rate from 38.8% to 48.6%. Age independently predicted (OR: 1.040, 95% CI: 1.008–1.078) GTR/near-total resection (NTR). Symptom relief occurred in 81.4% teratoma patients and 64.7% lipoma patients. Recurrence/symptomatic progression occurred in 19 teratomas and 7 lipomas after a median of 95 and 115 months, respectively. Adult lipoma patients without spinal dysraphism had lower recurrence rates. GTR (HR: 0.172, 95% CI: 0.02557–0.7028) and lesion length (HR: 1.351, 95% CI: 1.138–1.607) independently predicted recurrence/progression.

CONCLUSIONS

GTR should be pursued for adult/pediatric spinal teratomas and pediatric spinal lipomas. For adult spinal lipoma patients without dysraphism, conservative surgery could be considered.
脊柱畸胎瘤和脊柱脂肪瘤的回顾性分析:表现形式、手术治疗和结果的重叠与差异。
背景脊柱畸胎瘤和脂肪瘤,无论是成人病例还是儿童病例,都是罕见的疾病,有许多相似之处,但尚未进行系统比较。目的系统比较脊柱畸胎瘤和脂肪瘤,以优化管理。研究设计回顾性患者样本:在本中心接受手术治疗的无症状脊柱畸胎瘤和脂肪瘤患者.结果测量解剖分布、临床表现、切除情况和结果.方法纳入2008-2023年期间在本中心接受治疗且资料完整的脊柱畸胎瘤和脂肪瘤患者。2012年后常规进行电生理监测。分析了患者特征、解剖分布、临床表现、手术切除情况和结果。大多数肿瘤为腰骶部病变;颈部/胸部受累在脂肪瘤中更为常见。疼痛是最常见的表现,在畸胎瘤中更为常见。畸胎瘤和脂肪瘤中分别有51.1%和49%实现了大体全切除(GTR)。电生理监测将全切除率从38.8%提高到48.6%。年龄是GTR/近全切(NTR)的独立预测因素(OR:1.040,95% CI:1.008-1.078)。81.4%的畸胎瘤患者和64.7%的脂肪瘤患者症状缓解。分别有 19 例畸胎瘤和 7 例脂肪瘤患者在中位 95 个月和 115 个月后出现复发/症状进展。没有脊柱发育不良的成人脂肪瘤患者复发率较低。GTR(HR:0.172,95% CI:0.02557-0.7028)和病变长度(HR:1.351,95% CI:1.138-1.607)可独立预测复发/进展。对于无脊柱发育不良的成人脊柱脂肪瘤患者,可考虑保守手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信