Friend or foe in the eyes of the beholder? How and when LMX increases and decreases workplace ostracism

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Yi Ji, Fangmin Li, Waiseng Lou, Haixin Liu, Guiquan Li
{"title":"Friend or foe in the eyes of the beholder? How and when LMX increases and decreases workplace ostracism","authors":"Yi Ji, Fangmin Li, Waiseng Lou, Haixin Liu, Guiquan Li","doi":"10.1108/cms-07-2023-0364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to build on social comparison theory to develop a theoretical model of leader–member exchange (LMX) relationship to workplace ostracism through perceived organizational status by coworkers and envy. This study further proposes that warmth and competence may potentially moderate these two indirect effects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study tested the hypotheses in a battery manufacturing company located in South China by a survey of 216 employees organized in 55 work teams, using different sources. Additionally, the authors conduct two online vignette experiments to test this study’s mediation, proving the causality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors found that high-level LMX leads to both envy and perceived organizational status by coworkers, which results in a mixed blessing on workplace ostracism toward the employee with high-level LMX. The focal employee’s warmth and competence moderate these indirect relationships.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The authors use LMX to explore antecedents of workplace ostracism and explain how and when these focal employees suffer workplace ostracism from their coworkers. The authors extend the research on LMX by examining the interpersonal risk of being a focal employee. The authors discover two critical boundary conditions – warmth and competence.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This study suggests that it is important to balance the level of the differential LMX; appropriately endorsing other members is a good way to avoid eliciting envy and opposition. Meanwhile, person-oriented citizenship behaviors such as demonstrations of concern or help may shortly build up an employee’s warm impression on their coworkers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>By discovering the bright and dark sides of LMX, this paper has the potential to advance theories on LMX and workplace ostracism. Therefore, the authors believe the current research will have an important impact on relevant research in the future.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51675,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Management Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-07-2023-0364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to build on social comparison theory to develop a theoretical model of leader–member exchange (LMX) relationship to workplace ostracism through perceived organizational status by coworkers and envy. This study further proposes that warmth and competence may potentially moderate these two indirect effects.

Design/methodology/approach

This study tested the hypotheses in a battery manufacturing company located in South China by a survey of 216 employees organized in 55 work teams, using different sources. Additionally, the authors conduct two online vignette experiments to test this study’s mediation, proving the causality.

Findings

The authors found that high-level LMX leads to both envy and perceived organizational status by coworkers, which results in a mixed blessing on workplace ostracism toward the employee with high-level LMX. The focal employee’s warmth and competence moderate these indirect relationships.

Research limitations/implications

The authors use LMX to explore antecedents of workplace ostracism and explain how and when these focal employees suffer workplace ostracism from their coworkers. The authors extend the research on LMX by examining the interpersonal risk of being a focal employee. The authors discover two critical boundary conditions – warmth and competence.

Practical implications

This study suggests that it is important to balance the level of the differential LMX; appropriately endorsing other members is a good way to avoid eliciting envy and opposition. Meanwhile, person-oriented citizenship behaviors such as demonstrations of concern or help may shortly build up an employee’s warm impression on their coworkers.

Originality/value

By discovering the bright and dark sides of LMX, this paper has the potential to advance theories on LMX and workplace ostracism. Therefore, the authors believe the current research will have an important impact on relevant research in the future.

眼中的朋友还是敌人?LMX 如何以及何时增加和减少职场排斥现象
目的本研究旨在以社会比较理论为基础,通过同事感知到的组织地位和嫉妒,建立领导-成员交换(LMX)与职场排斥关系的理论模型。本研究进一步提出,温暖和能力可能会缓和这两种间接影响。本研究在一家位于中国南方的电池制造公司中,通过对 55 个工作团队中的 216 名员工进行调查,利用不同的资料来源对假设进行了检验。研究结果作者发现,高水平的 LMX 会导致同事的嫉妒和组织地位感知,从而导致对高水平 LMX 员工的职场排斥。研究局限/意义作者利用 LMX 探索了职场排斥的前因,并解释了这些焦点员工如何以及何时受到同事的职场排斥。作者通过研究作为焦点员工的人际风险,扩展了有关 LMX 的研究。本研究表明,平衡 LMX 差异水平非常重要;适当地认可其他成员是避免引起嫉妒和反对的好方法。同时,以人为本的公民行为,如关心或帮助,可能会在短期内建立起员工对同事的温暖印象。原创性/价值通过发现 LMX 的光明和黑暗面,本文有可能推进 LMX 和职场排斥的理论研究。因此,作者认为当前的研究将对未来的相关研究产生重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信