Tephra fall impacts to buildings: the 2017–2018 Manaro Voui eruption, Vanuatu

IF 2 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Susanna F. Jenkins, Ame McSporran, Thomas M. Wilson, Carol Stewart, Graham Leonard, Sandrine Cevuard, Esline Garaebiti
{"title":"Tephra fall impacts to buildings: the 2017–2018 Manaro Voui eruption, Vanuatu","authors":"Susanna F. Jenkins, Ame McSporran, Thomas M. Wilson, Carol Stewart, Graham Leonard, Sandrine Cevuard, Esline Garaebiti","doi":"10.3389/feart.2024.1392098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building damage from tephra falls can have a substantial impact on exposed communities around erupting volcanoes. There are limited empirical studies of tephra fall impacts on buildings, with none on tephra falls impacting traditional thatched timber buildings, despite their prevalence across South Pacific island nations and parts of Asia. The 2017/2018 explosive eruption of Manaro Voui, Ambae Island, Vanuatu, resulted in damage to traditional (thatched timber), non-traditional (masonry), and hybrid buildings from tephra falls in March/April and July 2018. Field and photographic surveys were conducted across three separate field studies with building characteristics and damage recorded for a total of 589 buildings. Buildings were classified using a damage state framework customised for this study. Overall, increasing tephra thicknesses were related to increasing severity of building damage, corroborating previous damage surveys and vulnerability estimates. Traditional buildings were found to be less resistant to tephra loading than non-traditional buildings, although there was variation in resistance within each building type. For example, some traditional buildings collapsed under ∼40 mm thickness while others sustained no damage when exposed to >200 mm. We attribute this to differences in the pre-eruption condition of the building and the implementation of mitigation strategies. Mitigation strategies included covering thatched roofs with tarpaulins, which helped shed tephra and consequently reduced loading, and providing an internal prop to the main roof beam, which aided structural resistance. As is typical of post-event building damage surveys, we had limited time and access to the exposed communities, and we note the limitations this had for our findings. Our results contribute to the limited empirical data available for tephra fall building damage and can be used to calibrate existing fragility functions, improving our evidence base for forecasting future impacts for similar construction types globally.","PeriodicalId":12359,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Earth Science","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Earth Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1392098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building damage from tephra falls can have a substantial impact on exposed communities around erupting volcanoes. There are limited empirical studies of tephra fall impacts on buildings, with none on tephra falls impacting traditional thatched timber buildings, despite their prevalence across South Pacific island nations and parts of Asia. The 2017/2018 explosive eruption of Manaro Voui, Ambae Island, Vanuatu, resulted in damage to traditional (thatched timber), non-traditional (masonry), and hybrid buildings from tephra falls in March/April and July 2018. Field and photographic surveys were conducted across three separate field studies with building characteristics and damage recorded for a total of 589 buildings. Buildings were classified using a damage state framework customised for this study. Overall, increasing tephra thicknesses were related to increasing severity of building damage, corroborating previous damage surveys and vulnerability estimates. Traditional buildings were found to be less resistant to tephra loading than non-traditional buildings, although there was variation in resistance within each building type. For example, some traditional buildings collapsed under ∼40 mm thickness while others sustained no damage when exposed to >200 mm. We attribute this to differences in the pre-eruption condition of the building and the implementation of mitigation strategies. Mitigation strategies included covering thatched roofs with tarpaulins, which helped shed tephra and consequently reduced loading, and providing an internal prop to the main roof beam, which aided structural resistance. As is typical of post-event building damage surveys, we had limited time and access to the exposed communities, and we note the limitations this had for our findings. Our results contribute to the limited empirical data available for tephra fall building damage and can be used to calibrate existing fragility functions, improving our evidence base for forecasting future impacts for similar construction types globally.
火山碎屑落下对建筑物的影响:瓦努阿图 2017-2018 年马纳罗-武伊火山爆发
火山碎屑坠落造成的建筑物损坏会对火山喷发周围的暴露社区产生重大影响。关于表土崩落对建筑物影响的实证研究非常有限,其中没有关于表土崩落对传统茅草木建筑影响的研究,尽管这种建筑在南太平洋岛国和亚洲部分地区非常普遍。瓦努阿图安贝岛马纳罗沃伊 2017/2018 年的爆炸性喷发导致传统建筑(茅草木结构)、非传统建筑(砖石结构)和混合型建筑在 2018 年 3 月/4 月和 7 月受到了落屑的破坏。在三项独立的实地研究中进行了实地和摄影调查,共记录了 589 栋建筑物的特征和损坏情况。使用为本研究定制的损坏状态框架对建筑物进行了分类。总体而言,表土厚度的增加与建筑物损坏严重程度的增加有关,这与之前的损坏调查和脆弱性估计相吻合。与非传统建筑相比,传统建筑的抗飞灰负荷能力较弱,但每种建筑类型的抗飞灰负荷能力存在差异。例如,一些传统建筑在厚度为 40 毫米的情况下倒塌,而另一些建筑在厚度为 200 毫米的情况下没有损坏。我们认为这是由于建筑物在地震前的状况和实施的减灾策略不同造成的。减灾策略包括用防水油布覆盖茅草屋顶,这有助于清除表土,从而减轻荷载,以及在屋顶主梁上安装内部支撑,这有助于提高结构抗性。与典型的灾后建筑损毁调查一样,我们只有有限的时间和机会进入暴露的社区,我们注意到这对我们的调查结果造成的限制。我们的研究结果为现有有限的有关热灰岩崩落建筑破坏的经验数据做出了贡献,并可用于校准现有的脆性函数,从而改善我们的证据基础,以预测全球类似建筑类型的未来影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Earth Science
Frontiers in Earth Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
2076
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Earth Science is an open-access journal that aims to bring together and publish on a single platform the best research dedicated to our planet. This platform hosts the rapidly growing and continuously expanding domains in Earth Science, involving the lithosphere (including the geosciences spectrum), the hydrosphere (including marine geosciences and hydrology, complementing the existing Frontiers journal on Marine Science) and the atmosphere (including meteorology and climatology). As such, Frontiers in Earth Science focuses on the countless processes operating within and among the major spheres constituting our planet. In turn, the understanding of these processes provides the theoretical background to better use the available resources and to face the major environmental challenges (including earthquakes, tsunamis, eruptions, floods, landslides, climate changes, extreme meteorological events): this is where interdependent processes meet, requiring a holistic view to better live on and with our planet. The journal welcomes outstanding contributions in any domain of Earth Science. The open-access model developed by Frontiers offers a fast, efficient, timely and dynamic alternative to traditional publication formats. The journal has 20 specialty sections at the first tier, each acting as an independent journal with a full editorial board. The traditional peer-review process is adapted to guarantee fairness and efficiency using a thorough paperless process, with real-time author-reviewer-editor interactions, collaborative reviewer mandates to maximize quality, and reviewer disclosure after article acceptance. While maintaining a rigorous peer-review, this system allows for a process whereby accepted articles are published online on average 90 days after submission. General Commentary articles as well as Book Reviews in Frontiers in Earth Science are only accepted upon invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信