Yu Qi, Kui Wu, Bo Wang, Xiaowen Zheng, Wenlan Li, Dan Li
{"title":"Lithofacies identification of deep coalbed methane reservoir based on high-resolution seismic inversion","authors":"Yu Qi, Kui Wu, Bo Wang, Xiaowen Zheng, Wenlan Li, Dan Li","doi":"10.3389/feart.2024.1440729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the exploration and development of deep coalbed methane (CBM), delineating the thickness of coal seam and lithofacies of the roof and floor is one of the major challenging tasks. In past attempts, the prediction methods of these parameters have been limited to the conventional inversion. However, the effect of coal shielding on adjacent reflecting layers restricts the identification of underlying sand effectively by conventional inversion. Also, the depth at which the deep CBM zone is located (1,500–2000 m) produces a significant overlap of P-wave impedance and Vp/Vs of sands and shale which increases classification uncertainty between these two lithofacies. We proposed a new workflow for high-precision quantitative seismic interpretation of deep CBM reservoir. Not only P-wave impedance but also GR is selected as the optimized attributes for lithofacies classification. To reduce the effect of strong reflection of coal seam and identifying thin coal layers, the seismic waveform indication inversion method is used to obtain high-resolution results of P-wave impedance and GR. It uses horizontal changes in seismic waveforms to reflect lithological assemblage characteristics for facies-controlled constraints. Then, Bayesian classification theory is used to achieve three-dimensional lithofacies classification with multi-source data. To improve the continuity and accuracy of the interpreted results, a Markov chain is applied in the Bayesian rule as the spatial prior constraint. A well-associated synthetic test and field data application in Ordos Basin demonstrates the accuracy of the proposed workflow. Compared with conventional inversion, the results of proposed workflow showed higher resolution and accuracy. By providing a new solution for the identification of roof and floor lithofacies of deep CBM reservoir, this workflow aims to contribute to the better exploration and development of deep CBM.","PeriodicalId":12359,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Earth Science","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Earth Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1440729","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During the exploration and development of deep coalbed methane (CBM), delineating the thickness of coal seam and lithofacies of the roof and floor is one of the major challenging tasks. In past attempts, the prediction methods of these parameters have been limited to the conventional inversion. However, the effect of coal shielding on adjacent reflecting layers restricts the identification of underlying sand effectively by conventional inversion. Also, the depth at which the deep CBM zone is located (1,500–2000 m) produces a significant overlap of P-wave impedance and Vp/Vs of sands and shale which increases classification uncertainty between these two lithofacies. We proposed a new workflow for high-precision quantitative seismic interpretation of deep CBM reservoir. Not only P-wave impedance but also GR is selected as the optimized attributes for lithofacies classification. To reduce the effect of strong reflection of coal seam and identifying thin coal layers, the seismic waveform indication inversion method is used to obtain high-resolution results of P-wave impedance and GR. It uses horizontal changes in seismic waveforms to reflect lithological assemblage characteristics for facies-controlled constraints. Then, Bayesian classification theory is used to achieve three-dimensional lithofacies classification with multi-source data. To improve the continuity and accuracy of the interpreted results, a Markov chain is applied in the Bayesian rule as the spatial prior constraint. A well-associated synthetic test and field data application in Ordos Basin demonstrates the accuracy of the proposed workflow. Compared with conventional inversion, the results of proposed workflow showed higher resolution and accuracy. By providing a new solution for the identification of roof and floor lithofacies of deep CBM reservoir, this workflow aims to contribute to the better exploration and development of deep CBM.
在深部煤层气(CBM)的勘探和开发过程中,煤层厚度和顶底板岩性的划分是具有挑战性的主要任务之一。在过去的尝试中,这些参数的预测方法仅限于常规反演。然而,煤层对相邻反射层的屏蔽效应限制了常规反演对下伏砂层的有效识别。此外,深层煤层气区所处的深度(1500-2000 米)会使砂和页岩的 P 波阻抗和 Vp/Vs 产生明显的重叠,从而增加了这两种岩性之间分类的不确定性。我们提出了一种新的深层煤层气储层高精度定量地震解释工作流程。不仅选择 P 波阻抗,还选择 GR 作为岩性分类的优化属性。为减小煤层强反射的影响和识别薄煤层,采用地震波形指示反演方法获得高分辨率的 P 波阻抗和 GR 结果。它利用地震波形的水平变化来反映岩性组合特征,进行面控约束。然后,利用贝叶斯分类理论实现多源数据的三维岩性分类。为了提高解释结果的连续性和准确性,在贝叶斯规则中应用了马尔科夫链作为空间先验约束。在鄂尔多斯盆地进行的相关合成试验和野外数据应用证明了所提出工作流程的准确性。与传统反演相比,所提工作流程的结果显示出更高的分辨率和精度。通过为深层煤层气储层顶底板岩性识别提供新的解决方案,该工作流程旨在为更好地勘探和开发深层煤层气做出贡献。
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Earth Science is an open-access journal that aims to bring together and publish on a single platform the best research dedicated to our planet.
This platform hosts the rapidly growing and continuously expanding domains in Earth Science, involving the lithosphere (including the geosciences spectrum), the hydrosphere (including marine geosciences and hydrology, complementing the existing Frontiers journal on Marine Science) and the atmosphere (including meteorology and climatology). As such, Frontiers in Earth Science focuses on the countless processes operating within and among the major spheres constituting our planet. In turn, the understanding of these processes provides the theoretical background to better use the available resources and to face the major environmental challenges (including earthquakes, tsunamis, eruptions, floods, landslides, climate changes, extreme meteorological events): this is where interdependent processes meet, requiring a holistic view to better live on and with our planet.
The journal welcomes outstanding contributions in any domain of Earth Science.
The open-access model developed by Frontiers offers a fast, efficient, timely and dynamic alternative to traditional publication formats. The journal has 20 specialty sections at the first tier, each acting as an independent journal with a full editorial board. The traditional peer-review process is adapted to guarantee fairness and efficiency using a thorough paperless process, with real-time author-reviewer-editor interactions, collaborative reviewer mandates to maximize quality, and reviewer disclosure after article acceptance. While maintaining a rigorous peer-review, this system allows for a process whereby accepted articles are published online on average 90 days after submission.
General Commentary articles as well as Book Reviews in Frontiers in Earth Science are only accepted upon invitation.