Multiple geochemical parameters of the Wuliying well of Beijing seismic monitoring networks probably responding to the small earthquake of Chaoyang, Beijing, in 2022

IF 2 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yuxuan Chen, Guiping Liu, Fuqiong Huang, Zhiguo Wang, Leyin Hu, Mingbo Yang, Xiaoru Sun, Peixue Hua, Shijun Zhu, Yanan Zhang, Xiaodong Wu, Zhihui Wang, Lvqing Xu, Kongyan Han, Bowen Cui, Hongyan Dong, Yonggang Zhou
{"title":"Multiple geochemical parameters of the Wuliying well of Beijing seismic monitoring networks probably responding to the small earthquake of Chaoyang, Beijing, in 2022","authors":"Yuxuan Chen, Guiping Liu, Fuqiong Huang, Zhiguo Wang, Leyin Hu, Mingbo Yang, Xiaoru Sun, Peixue Hua, Shijun Zhu, Yanan Zhang, Xiaodong Wu, Zhihui Wang, Lvqing Xu, Kongyan Han, Bowen Cui, Hongyan Dong, Yonggang Zhou","doi":"10.3389/feart.2024.1448035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydrological changes in groundwater coupled with earthquakes had been documented in previous studies by global researchers. Although few reports investigate multiple geochemical parameters that respond to earthquakes, trace elements received less attention, whereas they were suggested to be more sensitive to small earthquakes than the commonly used geochemical parameters. Beijing is located in the Zhangjiakou-Bohai (Zhang-Bo) seismic belt of North China, and although the occurrence of small earthquakes is frequent, the great historic earthquake in the Sanhe-Pinggu area M8 in 1679 in the adjoining southeast of Beijing gained widespread public attention. To find effective precursors that are significant for operational earthquake forecasting of the Beijing area, we carried out a one year test research project through weekly collection of groundwater samples during June 2021 to June 2022 from the seismic monitoring well of Wuliying in northwest Beijing. The 41 trace elements chemical compositions were analyzed for each sample. During the project ongoing period, the biggest earthquake with a magnitude of ML3.3 occurred in the Chaoyang District of Beijing on 3 February 2022. The content changes in these trace elements were systematically monitored before and after the earthquake. Through retrospective research, it was found that a few sensitive trace elements were anomalous to be coupled to the earthquake, including Li, Sc, Rb, Mo, Cs, Ba, W, U, Sr, Mn, Ni, and Zn. In addition to trace elements, we examined stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen and the existing hydrological data on groundwater level, temperature, major ions, and gases to assess the validity of geochemistry as a monitoring and predictive tool. We only found that F- (fluorine) ions and He (helium) gas had apparent shifts related to the earthquakes, while no shifts in the groundwater level were observed. Such characteristics of multiple geochemical parameters indicate that trace elements are likely to be more sensitive to crustal strain than the groundwater level and major ions. We assumed a most likely mechanism of the combination of mixing and water–rock interactions to explain the phenomenon. The probable scenario was that minor stresses caused by the earthquakes might create micro-cracks in bedrocks, thereby leading to a small volume of chemically distinct water mixing with the original water of the aquifer, and finally, the earthquake-induced rock fractures enhance the water–rock interactions, resulting in the post-seismic recovery of trace elements and δ<jats:sup>18</jats:sup>O value migration to the GWML. More testing works to find other sensitive sites to investigate multiple geochemical characteristics aiming at long-term to short-term earthquake prediction in the Beijing area and Zhang-Bo seismic belt are in progress.","PeriodicalId":12359,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Earth Science","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Earth Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1448035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrological changes in groundwater coupled with earthquakes had been documented in previous studies by global researchers. Although few reports investigate multiple geochemical parameters that respond to earthquakes, trace elements received less attention, whereas they were suggested to be more sensitive to small earthquakes than the commonly used geochemical parameters. Beijing is located in the Zhangjiakou-Bohai (Zhang-Bo) seismic belt of North China, and although the occurrence of small earthquakes is frequent, the great historic earthquake in the Sanhe-Pinggu area M8 in 1679 in the adjoining southeast of Beijing gained widespread public attention. To find effective precursors that are significant for operational earthquake forecasting of the Beijing area, we carried out a one year test research project through weekly collection of groundwater samples during June 2021 to June 2022 from the seismic monitoring well of Wuliying in northwest Beijing. The 41 trace elements chemical compositions were analyzed for each sample. During the project ongoing period, the biggest earthquake with a magnitude of ML3.3 occurred in the Chaoyang District of Beijing on 3 February 2022. The content changes in these trace elements were systematically monitored before and after the earthquake. Through retrospective research, it was found that a few sensitive trace elements were anomalous to be coupled to the earthquake, including Li, Sc, Rb, Mo, Cs, Ba, W, U, Sr, Mn, Ni, and Zn. In addition to trace elements, we examined stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen and the existing hydrological data on groundwater level, temperature, major ions, and gases to assess the validity of geochemistry as a monitoring and predictive tool. We only found that F- (fluorine) ions and He (helium) gas had apparent shifts related to the earthquakes, while no shifts in the groundwater level were observed. Such characteristics of multiple geochemical parameters indicate that trace elements are likely to be more sensitive to crustal strain than the groundwater level and major ions. We assumed a most likely mechanism of the combination of mixing and water–rock interactions to explain the phenomenon. The probable scenario was that minor stresses caused by the earthquakes might create micro-cracks in bedrocks, thereby leading to a small volume of chemically distinct water mixing with the original water of the aquifer, and finally, the earthquake-induced rock fractures enhance the water–rock interactions, resulting in the post-seismic recovery of trace elements and δ18O value migration to the GWML. More testing works to find other sensitive sites to investigate multiple geochemical characteristics aiming at long-term to short-term earthquake prediction in the Beijing area and Zhang-Bo seismic belt are in progress.
北京地震监测网五里营井的多种地球化学参数可能响应了 2022 年北京朝阳小地震
全球研究人员在以往的研究中记录了与地震有关的地下水水文变化。尽管很少有报告研究了多种地球化学参数对地震的响应,但痕量元素受到的关注较少,而痕量元素被认为比常用的地球化学参数对小地震更敏感。北京地处华北张家口-渤海(张博)地震带,虽然小地震频发,但 1679 年北京东南部毗邻的三河-平谷地区 M8 级历史大地震却引起了公众的广泛关注。为了寻找对北京地区地震业务预报有意义的有效前兆,我们开展了为期一年的试验研究项目,在 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 6 月期间,每周采集北京西北部五里营地震监测井的地下水样品。对每个样品的 41 种微量元素化学成分进行了分析。在项目进行期间,2022 年 2 月 3 日北京市朝阳区发生了最大的 ML3.3 级地震。在地震发生前后,对这些微量元素的含量变化进行了系统监测。通过回顾性研究发现,一些敏感的微量元素与地震存在耦合异常,包括 Li、Sc、Rb、Mo、Cs、Ba、W、U、Sr、Mn、Ni 和 Zn。除痕量元素外,我们还研究了氢和氧的稳定同位素以及地下水位、温度、主要离子和气体等现有水文数据,以评估地球化学作为监测和预测工具的有效性。我们只发现 F-(氟)离子和 He(氦)气体有明显的与地震有关的变化,而没有观察到地下水位的变化。多种地球化学参数的这种特征表明,痕量元素对地壳应变的敏感性可能高于地下水位和主要离子。我们假定最有可能的机制是混合和水岩相互作用相结合来解释这一现象。可能的情况是,地震引起的微小应力可能在基岩中产生微裂缝,从而导致少量化学性质不同的水与含水层中原有的水混合,最后,地震引起的岩石裂缝增强了水-岩相互作用,导致微量元素在震后恢复,δ18O 值迁移到全球地下水位线。目前正在开展更多的试验工作,以寻找其他敏感点来研究多种地球化学特征,从而对北京地区和张博地震带进行长期到短期的地震预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Earth Science
Frontiers in Earth Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
2076
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Earth Science is an open-access journal that aims to bring together and publish on a single platform the best research dedicated to our planet. This platform hosts the rapidly growing and continuously expanding domains in Earth Science, involving the lithosphere (including the geosciences spectrum), the hydrosphere (including marine geosciences and hydrology, complementing the existing Frontiers journal on Marine Science) and the atmosphere (including meteorology and climatology). As such, Frontiers in Earth Science focuses on the countless processes operating within and among the major spheres constituting our planet. In turn, the understanding of these processes provides the theoretical background to better use the available resources and to face the major environmental challenges (including earthquakes, tsunamis, eruptions, floods, landslides, climate changes, extreme meteorological events): this is where interdependent processes meet, requiring a holistic view to better live on and with our planet. The journal welcomes outstanding contributions in any domain of Earth Science. The open-access model developed by Frontiers offers a fast, efficient, timely and dynamic alternative to traditional publication formats. The journal has 20 specialty sections at the first tier, each acting as an independent journal with a full editorial board. The traditional peer-review process is adapted to guarantee fairness and efficiency using a thorough paperless process, with real-time author-reviewer-editor interactions, collaborative reviewer mandates to maximize quality, and reviewer disclosure after article acceptance. While maintaining a rigorous peer-review, this system allows for a process whereby accepted articles are published online on average 90 days after submission. General Commentary articles as well as Book Reviews in Frontiers in Earth Science are only accepted upon invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信