Understanding academic women’s silence in Poland: exploring with social cognitive theory

IF 2 Q3 BUSINESS
Leila Lotfi Dehkharghani, Jane Menzies, Andrea North-Samardzic, Sarah Jane Casey
{"title":"Understanding academic women’s silence in Poland: exploring with social cognitive theory","authors":"Leila Lotfi Dehkharghani, Jane Menzies, Andrea North-Samardzic, Sarah Jane Casey","doi":"10.1108/cpoib-04-2022-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to explore academic women’s silence from the perspective of social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1986), by examining the triadic influences of the individual, environment and behaviour, which impacts their silence. The study examines how women use personal, proxy and collective agency (Bandura, 2018) to reduce silence.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Interviewing 22 academics (20 women, 2 men) at a leading Polish university, this study used the Gioia <em>et al.</em> (2013) method to analyse the interviews, creating first- and second-order codes and final aggregated concepts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This study finds, from an environmental perspective, that societal-level gendering, which is underpinned by critical social factors and institutional logics that are part of Poland’s culture promoting gender stereotypes and family values influences women’s silence. There is clear evidence for the regression of women’s rights, which compounds women’s silence. These societal-level factors influence a hierarchical, bureaucratic organizational structure, alongside gender segregation. From an individual perspective, reasons for silence include socialization, fear, women’s lack of power, inequality and self-silencing to mitigate harassment or discrimination. Collective agency was a strongly mentioned theme to help reduce silence, which includes implementing training and development initiatives, creating a safe platform to voice concerns, structural transformation and cultural change.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study contributes to literature regarding women’s silence by exploring reasons for silence through the lens of Bandura’s social cognitive theory and agentic perspective, which demonstrates how silence could be reduced through collective action, in the understudied context of Poland, which highlights how country context intersects with organizational context and individual experience, influencing women’s silence.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46124,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on International Business","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Perspectives on International Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-04-2022-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to explore academic women’s silence from the perspective of social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1986), by examining the triadic influences of the individual, environment and behaviour, which impacts their silence. The study examines how women use personal, proxy and collective agency (Bandura, 2018) to reduce silence.

Design/methodology/approach

Interviewing 22 academics (20 women, 2 men) at a leading Polish university, this study used the Gioia et al. (2013) method to analyse the interviews, creating first- and second-order codes and final aggregated concepts.

Findings

This study finds, from an environmental perspective, that societal-level gendering, which is underpinned by critical social factors and institutional logics that are part of Poland’s culture promoting gender stereotypes and family values influences women’s silence. There is clear evidence for the regression of women’s rights, which compounds women’s silence. These societal-level factors influence a hierarchical, bureaucratic organizational structure, alongside gender segregation. From an individual perspective, reasons for silence include socialization, fear, women’s lack of power, inequality and self-silencing to mitigate harassment or discrimination. Collective agency was a strongly mentioned theme to help reduce silence, which includes implementing training and development initiatives, creating a safe platform to voice concerns, structural transformation and cultural change.

Originality/value

This study contributes to literature regarding women’s silence by exploring reasons for silence through the lens of Bandura’s social cognitive theory and agentic perspective, which demonstrates how silence could be reduced through collective action, in the understudied context of Poland, which highlights how country context intersects with organizational context and individual experience, influencing women’s silence.

理解波兰学术界女性的沉默:用社会认知理论进行探索
目的本研究旨在从社会认知理论(班杜拉,1986 年)的角度探讨女学者的沉默问题,研究影响其沉默的个人、环境和行为三重影响因素。本研究探讨了女性如何利用个人、代理和集体代理(班杜拉,2018 年)来减少沉默。本研究采用 Gioia 等人(2013 年)的方法对访谈进行分析,创建了一阶和二阶编码以及最终的综合概念。研究结果本研究从环境的角度发现,社会层面的性别化(由关键的社会因素和制度逻辑支撑)影响着女性的沉默,而这些社会因素和制度逻辑是波兰提倡性别刻板印象和家庭价值观的文化的一部分。有明显证据表明,妇女权利的倒退加剧了妇女的沉默。这些社会层面的因素影响着等级森严的官僚组织结构以及性别隔离。从个人角度来看,沉默的原因包括社会化、恐惧、妇女缺乏权力、不平等以及为减少骚扰或歧视而自我沉默。这项研究通过班杜拉的社会认知理论和代理视角探讨了沉默的原因,从而为有关妇女沉默的文献做出了贡献,该视角展示了如何在研究不足的波兰背景下通过集体行动来减少沉默,并强调了国家背景如何与组织背景和个人经历相互交织,从而影响妇女的沉默。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
15.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: In recent years, the business practices and management philosophies of global enterprises have been subject to increasingly close scrutiny by commentators in the fields of journalism and academia. Such scrutiny has been motivated by a growing desire to examine the nature of globalisation, its impact on specific communities and its benefits for society as a whole. Coverage includes, but is not restricted to, issues of: ■Globalization ■Production and consumption ■Economic change ■Societal change ■Politics and power of organizations and governments ■Environmental impact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信