I see artifacts: ICA-based EEG artifact removal does not improve deep network decoding across three BCI tasks.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Taeho Kang,Yiyu Chen,Christian Wallraven
{"title":"I see artifacts: ICA-based EEG artifact removal does not improve deep network decoding across three BCI tasks.","authors":"Taeho Kang,Yiyu Chen,Christian Wallraven","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/ad788e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\\textit{Objective.}
In this paper, we conduct a detailed investigation on the effect of IC-based noise rejection methods in neural network classifier-based decoding of electroencephalography (EEG) data in different task datasets.
\\textit{Approach.}
We apply a pipeline matrix of two popular different Independent Component (IC) decomposition methods (Infomax, AMICA) with three different component rejection strategies (none, ICLabel, and MARA) on three different EEG datasets (Motor imagery, long-term memory formation, and visual memory). We cross-validate processed data from each pipeline with three architectures commonly used for EEG classification (two convolutional neural networks (CNN) and one long short term memory (LSTM) based model. We compare decoding performances on within-participant and within-dataset levels. 
\\textit{Main Results.}
Our results show that the benefit from using IC-based noise rejection for decoding analyses is at best minor, as component-rejected data did not show consistently better performance than data without rejections---especially given the significant computational resources required for ICA computations.
\\textit{Significance.}
With ever growing emphasis on transparency and reproducibility, as well as the obvious benefits arising from streamlined processing of large-scale datasets, there has been an increased interest in automated methods for pre-processing EEG data. One prominent part of such pre-processing pipelines consists of identifying and potentially removing artifacts arising from extraneous sources. This is typically done via Independent Component (IC) based correction for which numerous methods have been proposed, differing not only in the decomposition of the raw data into ICs, but also in how they reject the computed ICs. While the benefits of these methods are well established in univariate statistical analyses, it is unclear whether they help in multivariate scenarios, and specifically in neural network based decoding studies. As computational costs for pre-processing large-scale datasets are considerable, it is important to consider whether the tradeoff between model performance and available resources is worth the effort.","PeriodicalId":16753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad788e","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

\textit{Objective.} In this paper, we conduct a detailed investigation on the effect of IC-based noise rejection methods in neural network classifier-based decoding of electroencephalography (EEG) data in different task datasets. \textit{Approach.} We apply a pipeline matrix of two popular different Independent Component (IC) decomposition methods (Infomax, AMICA) with three different component rejection strategies (none, ICLabel, and MARA) on three different EEG datasets (Motor imagery, long-term memory formation, and visual memory). We cross-validate processed data from each pipeline with three architectures commonly used for EEG classification (two convolutional neural networks (CNN) and one long short term memory (LSTM) based model. We compare decoding performances on within-participant and within-dataset levels. \textit{Main Results.} Our results show that the benefit from using IC-based noise rejection for decoding analyses is at best minor, as component-rejected data did not show consistently better performance than data without rejections---especially given the significant computational resources required for ICA computations. \textit{Significance.} With ever growing emphasis on transparency and reproducibility, as well as the obvious benefits arising from streamlined processing of large-scale datasets, there has been an increased interest in automated methods for pre-processing EEG data. One prominent part of such pre-processing pipelines consists of identifying and potentially removing artifacts arising from extraneous sources. This is typically done via Independent Component (IC) based correction for which numerous methods have been proposed, differing not only in the decomposition of the raw data into ICs, but also in how they reject the computed ICs. While the benefits of these methods are well established in univariate statistical analyses, it is unclear whether they help in multivariate scenarios, and specifically in neural network based decoding studies. As computational costs for pre-processing large-scale datasets are considerable, it is important to consider whether the tradeoff between model performance and available resources is worth the effort.
我看到了伪影基于 ICA 的脑电图伪影去除并不能改善三种 BCI 任务的深度网络解码。
\textit{Objective.} In this paper, we conduct a detailed investigation on the effect of IC-based noise rejection methods in neural network classifier-based decoding of electroencephalography (EEG) data in different task datasets. \textit{Approach.} 我们在三个不同的脑电图数据集(运动图像、长期记忆形成和视觉记忆)上应用了由两种流行的不同独立分量(IC)分解方法(Infomax、AMICA)和三种不同的分量剔除策略(无、ICLabel 和 MARA)组成的流水矩阵。我们用三种常用于脑电图分类的架构(两个卷积神经网络(CNN)和一个基于长短期记忆(LSTM)的模型)对每个管道处理过的数据进行交叉验证。我们比较了参与者内部和数据集内部的解码性能。我们的结果表明,在解码分析中使用基于集成电路的噪声剔除技术最多只能带来微不足道的好处,因为剔除成分的数据并没有显示出比没有剔除成分的数据持续更好的性能--特别是考虑到 ICA 计算所需的大量计算资源。 \textit{Significance.} 随着对透明度和可重复性的日益重视,以及简化处理大规模数据集带来的明显好处,人们对自动预处理脑电图数据的方法越来越感兴趣。此类预处理管道的一个重要部分是识别并可能去除外来来源产生的假象。这通常是通过基于独立分量(IC)的校正来实现的,为此已经提出了许多方法,这些方法不仅在将原始数据分解成 IC 方面存在差异,而且在如何剔除计算出的 IC 方面也存在差异。虽然这些方法的优点在单变量统计分析中已得到充分证实,但在多变量情况下,特别是在基于神经网络的解码研究中,这些方法是否有帮助还不清楚。由于预处理大规模数据集的计算成本相当高,因此必须考虑在模型性能和可用资源之间的权衡是否值得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neural engineering
Journal of neural engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
319
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The goal of Journal of Neural Engineering (JNE) is to act as a forum for the interdisciplinary field of neural engineering where neuroscientists, neurobiologists and engineers can publish their work in one periodical that bridges the gap between neuroscience and engineering. The journal publishes articles in the field of neural engineering at the molecular, cellular and systems levels. The scope of the journal encompasses experimental, computational, theoretical, clinical and applied aspects of: Innovative neurotechnology; Brain-machine (computer) interface; Neural interfacing; Bioelectronic medicines; Neuromodulation; Neural prostheses; Neural control; Neuro-rehabilitation; Neurorobotics; Optical neural engineering; Neural circuits: artificial & biological; Neuromorphic engineering; Neural tissue regeneration; Neural signal processing; Theoretical and computational neuroscience; Systems neuroscience; Translational neuroscience; Neuroimaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信