Pain Relief in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Pre-emptive Versus Post-operative Local Anaesthetic Infiltration—A Randomized Control Trial

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Gagan Soni, Devender Singh, Amol Sood, Yashwant Singh Rathore, Piyush Ranjan, Ankita Singh, Nitin Choudhary, Sunil Chumber
{"title":"Pain Relief in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Pre-emptive Versus Post-operative Local Anaesthetic Infiltration—A Randomized Control Trial","authors":"Gagan Soni, Devender Singh, Amol Sood, Yashwant Singh Rathore, Piyush Ranjan, Ankita Singh, Nitin Choudhary, Sunil Chumber","doi":"10.1007/s12262-024-04127-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a widely performed procedure globally, often results in post-operative pain, which impacts the length of hospital stay and imposes financial burdens. This randomised controlled trial aimed to compare the effects of pre-emptive versus post-operative local anaesthetic infiltration at port-site incisions on post-operative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Patients and methods</h3><p>This double-blinded study, conducted at a tertiary care hospital, included 50 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were divided into two groups: Pre-emptive analgesia (group A) and post-operative analgesia (group B). Randomization was performed with sealed envelopes, and patients were evaluated preoperatively. Pain scores, shoulder pain incidence, hospital stay duration, analgesic requirements, and return to normal activity were compared between the groups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Baseline demographic profiles were comparable. Pre-emptive analgesia demonstrated significantly lower Visual Analogue Scale scores at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 h, and 7 days post-operatively with no significant difference in shoulder pain incidence. Pre-emptive analgesia correlated with a markedly shorter hospital stay reduced analgesic requirements, and an earlier return to normal activity. Only 10% of patients from the post-operative analgesia group required additional analgesia.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Pre-emptive local anaesthetic infiltration at port sites yielded significant benefits, including reduced pain, lower analgesic requirements, shorter hospital stays, and earlier resumption of routine activities compared to post-operative infiltration.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial Registration</h3><p>This project is registered under the Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI) CTRI Number: CTRI/2023/08/056175 [Registered on: 07/08/2023]—trial registered prospectively</p>","PeriodicalId":13391,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgery","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-024-04127-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a widely performed procedure globally, often results in post-operative pain, which impacts the length of hospital stay and imposes financial burdens. This randomised controlled trial aimed to compare the effects of pre-emptive versus post-operative local anaesthetic infiltration at port-site incisions on post-operative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients.

Patients and methods

This double-blinded study, conducted at a tertiary care hospital, included 50 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were divided into two groups: Pre-emptive analgesia (group A) and post-operative analgesia (group B). Randomization was performed with sealed envelopes, and patients were evaluated preoperatively. Pain scores, shoulder pain incidence, hospital stay duration, analgesic requirements, and return to normal activity were compared between the groups.

Results

Baseline demographic profiles were comparable. Pre-emptive analgesia demonstrated significantly lower Visual Analogue Scale scores at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 h, and 7 days post-operatively with no significant difference in shoulder pain incidence. Pre-emptive analgesia correlated with a markedly shorter hospital stay reduced analgesic requirements, and an earlier return to normal activity. Only 10% of patients from the post-operative analgesia group required additional analgesia.

Conclusion

Pre-emptive local anaesthetic infiltration at port sites yielded significant benefits, including reduced pain, lower analgesic requirements, shorter hospital stays, and earlier resumption of routine activities compared to post-operative infiltration.

Trial Registration

This project is registered under the Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI) CTRI Number: CTRI/2023/08/056175 [Registered on: 07/08/2023]—trial registered prospectively

Abstract Image

腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的疼痛缓解:术前局部麻醉浸润与术后局部麻醉浸润--随机对照试验
导言:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是一种在全球广泛开展的手术,经常会导致术后疼痛,影响住院时间并造成经济负担。这项随机对照试验旨在比较术前和术后在切口处浸润局麻药对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后疼痛的影响。患者和方法这项双盲研究在一家三级医院进行,包括 50 名计划接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者,分为两组:术前镇痛(A 组)和术后镇痛(B 组)。随机分组用信封密封,患者术前接受评估。对两组患者的疼痛评分、肩痛发生率、住院时间、镇痛需求和恢复正常活动情况进行比较。术前镇痛明显降低了术后1、3、6、12、24小时和7天的视觉模拟量表评分,但肩痛发生率无明显差异。预先镇痛明显缩短了住院时间,减少了镇痛需求,并能更早地恢复正常活动。术后镇痛组仅有 10% 的患者需要额外镇痛。结论与术后浸润相比,在手术部位进行先期局部麻醉浸润具有显著优势,包括减少疼痛、降低镇痛需求、缩短住院时间以及更早地恢复正常活动:CTRI/2023/08/056175 [注册日期:07/08/2023]-试验注册为前瞻性试验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
412
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the Association of Surgeons of India that considers for publication articles in all fields of surgery. Issues are published bimonthly in the months of February, April, June, August, October and December. The journal publishes Original article, Point of technique, Review article, Case report, Letter to editor, Teachers and surgeons from the past - A short (up to 500 words) bio sketch of a revered teacher or surgeon whom you hold in esteem and Images in surgery, surgical pathology, and surgical radiology. A trusted resource for peer-reviewed coverage of all types of surgery Provides a forum for surgeons in India and abroad to exchange ideas and advance the art of surgery The official publication of the Association of Surgeons of India 92% of authors who answered a survey reported that they would definitely publish or probably publish in the journal again The Indian Journal of Surgery offers peer-reviewed coverage of all types of surgery. The Journal publishes Original articles, Points of technique, Review articles, Case reports, Letters, Images and brief biographies of influential teachers and surgeons. The Journal spans General Surgery, Pediatric Surgery, Neurosurgery, Plastic Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Rural Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, Urology, Surgical Oncology, Radiology, Anaesthesia, Trauma Services, Minimal Access Surgery, Endocrine Surgery, GI Surgery, ENT, Colorectal Surgery, surgical practice and research. The Journal provides a forum for surgeons from India and abroad to exchange ideas, to propagate the advancement of science and the art of surgery and to promote friendship among surgeons in India and abroad. This has been a trusted platform for surgons in communicating up-to-date scientific informeation to the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信