Carbonylations in flow: tube-in-tube reactor vs gas-liquid slug flow

IF 3.4 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Agnieszka Ladosz, Astrid Friedli, Arnaud Lhuillery, Georg Rueedi
{"title":"Carbonylations in flow: tube-in-tube reactor vs gas-liquid slug flow","authors":"Agnieszka Ladosz, Astrid Friedli, Arnaud Lhuillery, Georg Rueedi","doi":"10.1039/d4re00287c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to improve the performance of carbonylation reactions in flow we compared the tube-in-tube system to a gas-liquid two-phase setup. We found that the two-phase slug flow reactor significantly improved the yield and throughput of the reactions tested. First, we performed a reference reaction, methoxycarbonylation of 4-chlorobenzonitrile, using conditions described in literature and obtained 57% calculated yield in biphasic setup and 16% in the tube-in-tube setup, with side product formation of 1% and 8% respectively. The reaction was further optimized in both apparatuses, improving the yield in the biphasic setup to 86%, while the tube-in-tube method was limited to about 34%. Finally, a 1.5 g scale-up of a project-relevant building block yielded 73% of product in the tube-in-tube setup vs 92% when two-phase flow was used, with more than ten-fold increase in throughput in the biphasic method. Using gas-liquid flow enabled higher yield and throughput due to direct contact of gas and liquid, better control of CO equivalents and intensification of process conditions: higher temperature, pressure and concentration in the system and significant reduction of residence time.","PeriodicalId":101,"journal":{"name":"Reaction Chemistry & Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reaction Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4re00287c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to improve the performance of carbonylation reactions in flow we compared the tube-in-tube system to a gas-liquid two-phase setup. We found that the two-phase slug flow reactor significantly improved the yield and throughput of the reactions tested. First, we performed a reference reaction, methoxycarbonylation of 4-chlorobenzonitrile, using conditions described in literature and obtained 57% calculated yield in biphasic setup and 16% in the tube-in-tube setup, with side product formation of 1% and 8% respectively. The reaction was further optimized in both apparatuses, improving the yield in the biphasic setup to 86%, while the tube-in-tube method was limited to about 34%. Finally, a 1.5 g scale-up of a project-relevant building block yielded 73% of product in the tube-in-tube setup vs 92% when two-phase flow was used, with more than ten-fold increase in throughput in the biphasic method. Using gas-liquid flow enabled higher yield and throughput due to direct contact of gas and liquid, better control of CO equivalents and intensification of process conditions: higher temperature, pressure and concentration in the system and significant reduction of residence time.
流动中的羰基化:管中管反应器与气液蛞蝓流
为了提高流动羰基化反应的性能,我们将管中管系统与气液两相装置进行了比较。我们发现,两相蛞蝓流反应器显著提高了测试反应的产率和吞吐量。首先,我们使用文献中描述的条件进行了一个参考反应,即 4-氯苯腈的甲氧基羰基化反应,在双相装置中获得了 57% 的计算收率,在管中管装置中获得了 16%,副产物生成率分别为 1%和 8%。在这两种装置中对反应进行了进一步优化,将双相装置中的产率提高到 86%,而管中管法的产率限制在 34%左右。最后,将与项目相关的构筑基块放大 1.5 克后,管中管装置的产率为 73%,而使用两相流装置的产率为 92%,双相法的产量提高了 10 倍以上。由于气体和液体直接接触、更好地控制一氧化碳当量以及强化工艺条件:系统中更高的温度、压力和浓度以及显著缩短停留时间,使用气液两相流可提高产量和吞吐量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reaction Chemistry & Engineering
Reaction Chemistry & Engineering Chemistry-Chemistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
227
期刊介绍: Reaction Chemistry & Engineering is a new journal reporting cutting edge research into all aspects of making molecules for the benefit of fundamental research, applied processes and wider society. From fundamental, molecular-level chemistry to large scale chemical production, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering brings together communities of chemists and chemical engineers working to ensure the crucial role of reaction chemistry in today’s world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信