Determination of dynamic flow stress equation based on discrete experimental data: Part 1 Methodology and the dependence of dynamic flow stress on strain-rate
{"title":"Determination of dynamic flow stress equation based on discrete experimental data: Part 1 Methodology and the dependence of dynamic flow stress on strain-rate","authors":"Xianglin Huang, Q. M. Li","doi":"arxiv-2409.04697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, a framework to determine the dynamic flow stress equation of\nmaterials based on discrete data of varied (or instantaneous) strain-rate from\nsplit Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) experiments is proposed. The conventional\nconstant strain-rate requirement in SHPB test is purposely relaxed to generate\nrich dynamic flow stress data which are widely and diversely distributed in\nplastic strain and strain-rate space. Two groups of independent SHPB tests,\ni.e. Group A (without shaper) and Group B (with shaper) were conducted on the\nC54400 phosphor-bronze copper alloy at room temperature, obtaining flow stress\ndata (FSD) (two-dimensional (2D) matrix). Data qualification criteria were\nproposed to screen the FSD, with which qualified FSD were obtained. The\nqualified FSD of Group A were coarsely filled with missing data and were\nreconstructed by the Artificial Neural Network (ANN). As a result,\nfinely-filled FSD of Group A were obtained, which were carefully evaluated by\nthe qualified FSD of Group B. The evaluation proves the effectiveness of ANN in\nFSD prediction. Next, the finely-filled FSD from Group A were decomposed by\nSingular Value Decomposition (SVD) method. Discrete and analytical flow stress\nequation f(strain, strain-rate)_ana were obtained from the SVD results.\nFinally, flow stress equation (f(strain, strain-rate)_MJC) based on\nconventional method were established. Five uncertainties inherent in the\nconventional method in the determination of the flow stress equation were\nidentified. The comparison between f(strain, strain-rate)_ana and f(strain,\nstrain-rate)_MJC demonstrated the effectiveness and reliability of the flow\nstress equation obtained from the proposed method.","PeriodicalId":501083,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Applied Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Applied Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, a framework to determine the dynamic flow stress equation of
materials based on discrete data of varied (or instantaneous) strain-rate from
split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) experiments is proposed. The conventional
constant strain-rate requirement in SHPB test is purposely relaxed to generate
rich dynamic flow stress data which are widely and diversely distributed in
plastic strain and strain-rate space. Two groups of independent SHPB tests,
i.e. Group A (without shaper) and Group B (with shaper) were conducted on the
C54400 phosphor-bronze copper alloy at room temperature, obtaining flow stress
data (FSD) (two-dimensional (2D) matrix). Data qualification criteria were
proposed to screen the FSD, with which qualified FSD were obtained. The
qualified FSD of Group A were coarsely filled with missing data and were
reconstructed by the Artificial Neural Network (ANN). As a result,
finely-filled FSD of Group A were obtained, which were carefully evaluated by
the qualified FSD of Group B. The evaluation proves the effectiveness of ANN in
FSD prediction. Next, the finely-filled FSD from Group A were decomposed by
Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) method. Discrete and analytical flow stress
equation f(strain, strain-rate)_ana were obtained from the SVD results.
Finally, flow stress equation (f(strain, strain-rate)_MJC) based on
conventional method were established. Five uncertainties inherent in the
conventional method in the determination of the flow stress equation were
identified. The comparison between f(strain, strain-rate)_ana and f(strain,
strain-rate)_MJC demonstrated the effectiveness and reliability of the flow
stress equation obtained from the proposed method.