Patterns of vascular access among chronic kidney disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis at Muhimbili National Hospital. A single centre cross-sectional study

Daniel Msilanga, Jacqueline Shoo, Jonathan Mngumi
{"title":"Patterns of vascular access among chronic kidney disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis at Muhimbili National Hospital. A single centre cross-sectional study","authors":"Daniel Msilanga, Jacqueline Shoo, Jonathan Mngumi","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.16.24312124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hemodialysis access profoundly impacts the quality of care for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients worldwide, with arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) preferred for superior outcomes. Despite global guidelines, Sub-Saharan Africa, including Tanzania, faces challenges, as it relies heavily on nontunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) due to accessibility and financial constraints. We aimed to describe the pattern of vascular access use among CKD patients on maintenance hemodialysis at Muhimbili National Hospital.\nMethods: A cross-sectional study to describe the pattern of vascular access among patients with CKD on maintenance hemodialysis therapy. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the baseline characteristics and patterns of vascular access.\nResults: We analysed 200 study participants, with a mean age of 53.3 (14.5) years. Almost all participants initiated hemodialysis with nontunneled central venous catheters (95.5%). A substantial portion continued to use nontunneled CVCs (25.5%), with some transitioning to tunneled CVCs (39.5%) or AVFs (35%). The mean (SD) duration to use nontunneled CVCs before transitioning to tunneled or AVF were 7.1 (2.1) months. Among patients with multiple nontunneled catheters, catheter dislodgement was the main indication for catheter replacement.\nConclusion:\nOur study highlights the prevalent use of nontunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) as the primary vascular access method for CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis at Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania. These findings underscore the urgent need for analysis of the cost associated with nontunneled catheter reliance and interventions to improve access to AVFs and enhance vascular access management, ultimately optimizing patient outcomes in resource-limited settings.","PeriodicalId":501513,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Nephrology","volume":"10891 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.16.24312124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hemodialysis access profoundly impacts the quality of care for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients worldwide, with arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) preferred for superior outcomes. Despite global guidelines, Sub-Saharan Africa, including Tanzania, faces challenges, as it relies heavily on nontunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) due to accessibility and financial constraints. We aimed to describe the pattern of vascular access use among CKD patients on maintenance hemodialysis at Muhimbili National Hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional study to describe the pattern of vascular access among patients with CKD on maintenance hemodialysis therapy. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the baseline characteristics and patterns of vascular access. Results: We analysed 200 study participants, with a mean age of 53.3 (14.5) years. Almost all participants initiated hemodialysis with nontunneled central venous catheters (95.5%). A substantial portion continued to use nontunneled CVCs (25.5%), with some transitioning to tunneled CVCs (39.5%) or AVFs (35%). The mean (SD) duration to use nontunneled CVCs before transitioning to tunneled or AVF were 7.1 (2.1) months. Among patients with multiple nontunneled catheters, catheter dislodgement was the main indication for catheter replacement. Conclusion: Our study highlights the prevalent use of nontunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) as the primary vascular access method for CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis at Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania. These findings underscore the urgent need for analysis of the cost associated with nontunneled catheter reliance and interventions to improve access to AVFs and enhance vascular access management, ultimately optimizing patient outcomes in resource-limited settings.
Muhimbili 国立医院接受维持性血液透析的慢性肾病患者的血管通路模式。单中心横断面研究
背景:血液透析通路对全球慢性肾脏病 (CKD) 患者的护理质量有着深远的影响,动静脉内瘘 (AVF) 是治疗效果更佳的首选。尽管制定了全球指南,但包括坦桑尼亚在内的撒哈拉以南非洲地区仍面临着挑战,因为交通不便和经济拮据,该地区严重依赖非隧道中心静脉导管(CVC)。我们旨在描述在穆汉比利国立医院接受维持性血液透析的慢性肾脏病患者使用血管通路的模式:这是一项横断面研究,旨在描述接受维持性血液透析治疗的 CKD 患者使用血管通路的模式。结果:我们对 200 名研究参与者进行了分析:我们对 200 名参与者进行了分析,他们的平均年龄为 53.3(14.5)岁。几乎所有参与者在开始血液透析时都使用了非隧道中心静脉导管(95.5%)。相当一部分人继续使用非隧道式 CVC(25.5%),还有一些人过渡到隧道式 CVC(39.5%)或 AVF(35%)。在过渡到隧道式或 AVF 之前,使用非隧道式 CVC 的平均时间(标度)为 7.1 (2.1) 个月。结论:我们的研究突出表明,坦桑尼亚穆汉比利国立医院的血液透析患者普遍使用非隧道式中心静脉导管(CVC)作为主要的血管通路方法。这些研究结果突出表明,在资源有限的情况下,迫切需要分析与依赖非隧道导管相关的成本和干预措施,以改善动静脉导管的通路并加强血管通路管理,最终优化患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信