Assessing Public Perceptions of Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK, Germany, Sweden, and Italy: A Topic Modeling Approach

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Felix Machleid, Roberto Fernandez Crespo, Kelsey Flott, Saira Ghafur, Ara Darzi, Erik Mayer, Ana Luisa Neves
{"title":"Assessing Public Perceptions of Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK, Germany, Sweden, and Italy: A Topic Modeling Approach","authors":"Felix Machleid, Roberto Fernandez Crespo, Kelsey Flott, Saira Ghafur, Ara Darzi, Erik Mayer, Ana Luisa Neves","doi":"10.1177/21582440241263147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has driven the transition from face-to-face visits to virtual care delivery. In this study, we explore patients’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of using virtual primary care technologies during the pandemic, using machine learning approaches. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in August 2020 in Italy, Sweden, Germany, and the UK. Latent Dirichlet Allocation was used to identify themes of two open-ended questions. Comparisons between participant characteristics were made using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. 6,331 participants were included (51.7% female; 42.4% +55 years; 60.5% white ethnicity; 86.6% low literacy). The benefits extracted included: primary care delivery, infection control, reducing contacts, virtual care, timeliness, patient-doctor interaction, convenience, and safety. Participants from Sweden were most likely to mention “primary care delivery” (UK p = .007, IT p = .03, DE p < .001), from the UK “virtual care” (SE p < .001, IT p < .001, DE p < .001) and from Italy “patient-doctor interaction” (UK p < .001, SE p < .001, DE p < .001). The challenges included: diagnostic difficulties, physical examination, digital health risks, technical challenges, virtual care, data security and protection, and lack of personal contact. “Diagnostic difficulties” was most significantly mentioned in Sweden (UK p = .009, IT p < .001, DE p < .001), “virtual care” in the UK (IT p = .02, SE p = .001, DE p < .001), and “data security and protection” in Germany (UK p < .001, IT p = .019, SE p < .001). Our study reinforces the feasibility of using machine learning to explore large qualitative datasets. Our findings contribute to a better identification of the lessons learned during the pandemic and inform improvements in policy and practice.","PeriodicalId":48167,"journal":{"name":"Sage Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sage Open","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241263147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has driven the transition from face-to-face visits to virtual care delivery. In this study, we explore patients’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of using virtual primary care technologies during the pandemic, using machine learning approaches. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in August 2020 in Italy, Sweden, Germany, and the UK. Latent Dirichlet Allocation was used to identify themes of two open-ended questions. Comparisons between participant characteristics were made using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. 6,331 participants were included (51.7% female; 42.4% +55 years; 60.5% white ethnicity; 86.6% low literacy). The benefits extracted included: primary care delivery, infection control, reducing contacts, virtual care, timeliness, patient-doctor interaction, convenience, and safety. Participants from Sweden were most likely to mention “primary care delivery” (UK p = .007, IT p = .03, DE p < .001), from the UK “virtual care” (SE p < .001, IT p < .001, DE p < .001) and from Italy “patient-doctor interaction” (UK p < .001, SE p < .001, DE p < .001). The challenges included: diagnostic difficulties, physical examination, digital health risks, technical challenges, virtual care, data security and protection, and lack of personal contact. “Diagnostic difficulties” was most significantly mentioned in Sweden (UK p = .009, IT p < .001, DE p < .001), “virtual care” in the UK (IT p = .02, SE p = .001, DE p < .001), and “data security and protection” in Germany (UK p < .001, IT p = .019, SE p < .001). Our study reinforces the feasibility of using machine learning to explore large qualitative datasets. Our findings contribute to a better identification of the lessons learned during the pandemic and inform improvements in policy and practice.
评估英国、德国、瑞典和意大利在 COVID-19 大流行期间公众对虚拟初级保健的看法:主题建模方法
COVID-19 大流行推动了从面对面就诊到虚拟医疗服务的转变。在本研究中,我们利用机器学习方法探讨了患者对大流行期间使用虚拟初级保健技术的益处和挑战的看法。我们于 2020 年 8 月在意大利、瑞典、德国和英国进行了一项横断面调查。采用潜在 Dirichlet 分配法确定了两个开放式问题的主题。参与者特征之间的比较采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验。共纳入 6331 名参与者(51.7% 为女性;42.4% 年龄在 55 岁以上;60.5% 为白人;86.6% 文化程度较低)。所提取的益处包括:初级医疗服务、感染控制、减少接触、虚拟医疗、及时性、医患互动、便利性和安全性。来自瑞典的参与者最有可能提到 "提供初级医疗服务"(英国 p = .007,信息技术 p = .03,德国 p <.001),来自英国的参与者最有可能提到 "虚拟医疗服务"(瑞典 p <.001,信息技术 p <.001,德国 p <.001),来自意大利的参与者最有可能提到 "医患互动"(英国 p <.001,瑞典 p <.001,德国 p <.001)。挑战包括:诊断困难、身体检查、数字健康风险、技术挑战、虚拟医疗、数据安全和保护以及缺乏个人接触。"诊断困难 "在瑞典被提及最多(英国 p = .009,信息技术 p = .001,德国 p = .001),"虚拟医疗 "在英国被提及最多(信息技术 p = .02,东南欧 p = .001,德国 p = .001),"数据安全和保护 "在德国被提及最多(英国 p = .001,信息技术 p = .019,东南欧 p = .001)。我们的研究加强了使用机器学习探索大型定性数据集的可行性。我们的研究结果有助于更好地识别大流行病期间的经验教训,并为政策和实践的改进提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sage Open
Sage Open SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
721
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信