Exploring the Effects of Written Corrective Feedback Types on Grammatical Accuracy in L2 Writing: Evidence From Ethiopian High School Students

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Hailay Tesfay Gebremariam
{"title":"Exploring the Effects of Written Corrective Feedback Types on Grammatical Accuracy in L2 Writing: Evidence From Ethiopian High School Students","authors":"Hailay Tesfay Gebremariam","doi":"10.1177/21582440241274331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although, written corrective feedback (hereafter referred to as CF) is applauded in many writing courses for fostering students’ quality writing, its impact on grammatical accuracy in L2 students’ writing remains a debated topic. Thus, this study looked into the effect of CF types on L2 students’ grammatical accuracy in writing. To achieve this objective, the design of this study was quasi-experiment. During the intervention of the study three groups: two experimental groups and one control group were participated with a total of 150 students. Over the intervention of 8 weeks, the students received pretest, immediate post-test and a delayed post-test was given. The data collected through the writing tests was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Scheffe post hoc tests. The findings indicated that although CF types have positive effects during the immediate posttest scores, they did not have any positive effect on L2 students’ grammatical accuracy in writing context in the delayed posttest scores. This implies that CF alone is not sufficient for improving the grammatical accuracy of high school students in Ethiopia. Although the CF literature discussed its importance in the language acquisition, teachers are advised to focus on students’ additional exposures in writing accuracy rather than grammatical correction in their writing classes and use longer treatment to allow language learners’ engagement with the CF types provided.","PeriodicalId":48167,"journal":{"name":"Sage Open","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sage Open","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241274331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although, written corrective feedback (hereafter referred to as CF) is applauded in many writing courses for fostering students’ quality writing, its impact on grammatical accuracy in L2 students’ writing remains a debated topic. Thus, this study looked into the effect of CF types on L2 students’ grammatical accuracy in writing. To achieve this objective, the design of this study was quasi-experiment. During the intervention of the study three groups: two experimental groups and one control group were participated with a total of 150 students. Over the intervention of 8 weeks, the students received pretest, immediate post-test and a delayed post-test was given. The data collected through the writing tests was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Scheffe post hoc tests. The findings indicated that although CF types have positive effects during the immediate posttest scores, they did not have any positive effect on L2 students’ grammatical accuracy in writing context in the delayed posttest scores. This implies that CF alone is not sufficient for improving the grammatical accuracy of high school students in Ethiopia. Although the CF literature discussed its importance in the language acquisition, teachers are advised to focus on students’ additional exposures in writing accuracy rather than grammatical correction in their writing classes and use longer treatment to allow language learners’ engagement with the CF types provided.
探索书面纠正反馈类型对 L2 写作语法准确性的影响:来自埃塞俄比亚高中生的证据
尽管书面纠正反馈(以下简称CF)在许多写作课程中都因能提高学生的写作质量而备受赞誉,但它对L2学生写作中语法准确性的影响仍是一个备受争议的话题。因此,本研究探讨了CF类型对L2学生写作语法准确性的影响。为实现这一目标,本研究采用了准实验设计。在研究的干预过程中,共有三组学生参加:两组实验组和一组对照组,共计 150 名学生。在为期 8 周的干预期间,学生们接受了前测、即时后测和延迟后测。通过写作测试收集的数据采用单因素方差分析和 Scheffe 事后检验进行了分析。研究结果表明,尽管CF类型在即时后测成绩中具有积极影响,但在延迟后测成绩中,它们对后进生在写作语境中的语法准确性没有任何积极影响。这意味着,单靠语法训练不足以提高埃塞俄比亚高中生的语法准确性。尽管CF文献讨论了其在语言习得中的重要性,但建议教师在写作课上关注学生在写作准确性方面的额外暴露,而不是语法纠正,并使用较长的治疗时间,让语言学习者参与到所提供的CF类型中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sage Open
Sage Open SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
721
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信