Dividend omissions and dividend cuts behaviour: a dynamic random-effect probit panel regression analysis

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Samveg Patel
{"title":"Dividend omissions and dividend cuts behaviour: a dynamic random-effect probit panel regression analysis","authors":"Samveg Patel","doi":"10.1108/mf-06-2024-0433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The study aims to examine the dividend omissions and dividend cuts behaviour of manufacturing and non-financial services firms to identify the determinants of dividend omissions and dividend cuts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The study analyses the financial data of 3,546 firms from 2011 to 2020 (35,460 firm-year observations) using a dynamic random-effect probit panel regression model.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results suggest that profitability, growth opportunity, leverage, liquidity, risk, extraordinary income, shareholding pattern and buyback are major determinants of dividend omissions. Similarly, dividend cut in the previous year, profitability, operating cash flow, risk and extraordinary income are major factors leading to dividend cuts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>Firms which omit the dividend are less likely to start paying dividend in subsequent years, whereas firms which cut the dividend may increase dividend in later years. Also, profitability decreases for a significant number of firms post dividend omission and cut. This indicates that dividend omission is a more prominent signal than a dividend cut for the financial health of a firm.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The determinants identified in the study enable analysts and portfolio managers to decide the propensity of dividend omission and cut even before actual announcements and can alleviate the significant loss in the portfolio. Also, managers and the board of directors would be able to monitor the firm’s financial performance to avoid the situation leading to dividend omissions and cuts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>The study strongly recommends that firms should voluntarily pay dividends to shareholders to encourage the healthy participation of retail shareholders in the equity market and create a long-term win–win situation for all stakeholders in society. If a large number of firms continue not to pay the dividend, the study appeals to the regulators to intervene to protect shareholders' interests for the greater good of society.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>To the best of author’s knowledge, this is the first study to empirically identify the determinants of dividend omission and cut in the unique setting like India where dividend taxation had undergone a significant change.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":18140,"journal":{"name":"Managerial Finance","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-06-2024-0433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The study aims to examine the dividend omissions and dividend cuts behaviour of manufacturing and non-financial services firms to identify the determinants of dividend omissions and dividend cuts.

Design/methodology/approach

The study analyses the financial data of 3,546 firms from 2011 to 2020 (35,460 firm-year observations) using a dynamic random-effect probit panel regression model.

Findings

The results suggest that profitability, growth opportunity, leverage, liquidity, risk, extraordinary income, shareholding pattern and buyback are major determinants of dividend omissions. Similarly, dividend cut in the previous year, profitability, operating cash flow, risk and extraordinary income are major factors leading to dividend cuts.

Research limitations/implications

Firms which omit the dividend are less likely to start paying dividend in subsequent years, whereas firms which cut the dividend may increase dividend in later years. Also, profitability decreases for a significant number of firms post dividend omission and cut. This indicates that dividend omission is a more prominent signal than a dividend cut for the financial health of a firm.

Practical implications

The determinants identified in the study enable analysts and portfolio managers to decide the propensity of dividend omission and cut even before actual announcements and can alleviate the significant loss in the portfolio. Also, managers and the board of directors would be able to monitor the firm’s financial performance to avoid the situation leading to dividend omissions and cuts.

Social implications

The study strongly recommends that firms should voluntarily pay dividends to shareholders to encourage the healthy participation of retail shareholders in the equity market and create a long-term win–win situation for all stakeholders in society. If a large number of firms continue not to pay the dividend, the study appeals to the regulators to intervene to protect shareholders' interests for the greater good of society.

Originality/value

To the best of author’s knowledge, this is the first study to empirically identify the determinants of dividend omission and cut in the unique setting like India where dividend taxation had undergone a significant change.

股息遗漏与股息削减行为:动态随机效应 probit 面板回归分析
研究目的本研究旨在考察制造业和非金融服务企业的股利遗漏和股利削减行为,以确定股利遗漏和股利削减的决定因素。研究结果研究结果表明,盈利能力、增长机会、杠杆率、流动性、风险、非经常性收入、持股模式和回购是股利遗漏的主要决定因素。同样,前一年的股息削减、盈利能力、经营现金流、风险和非经常性收入也是导致股息削减的主要因素。研究局限性/意义漏发股息的公司不太可能在以后几年开始支付股息,而削减股息的公司可能会在以后几年增加股息。此外,相当多的公司在不派发股息和削减股息后盈利能力会下降。实际意义本研究中确定的决定因素使分析师和投资组合经理能够在实际公布之前就决定不分红和削减分红的倾向,从而减少投资组合中的重大损失。社会影响本研究强烈建议公司应自愿向股东支付股息,以鼓励散户股东健康地参与股票市场,并为社会所有利益相关者创造一个长期双赢的局面。如果大量公司继续不支付股息,本研究呼吁监管机构进行干预,以保护股东利益,造福社会。 原创性/价值 据作者所知,在印度这种股息税已发生重大变化的独特环境中,本研究是首次以实证方法确定股息遗漏和削减的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Managerial Finance
Managerial Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Managerial Finance provides an international forum for the publication of high quality and topical research in the area of finance, such as corporate finance, financial management, financial markets and institutions, international finance, banking, insurance and risk management, real estate and financial education. Theoretical and empirical research is welcome as well as cross-disciplinary work, such as papers investigating the relationship of finance with other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信