Maximilian Rixner, Maximilian Ludwig, Matthias Lindner, Inéz Frerichs, Armin Sablewski, Karl-Robert Wichmann, Max-Carl Wachter, Kei W. Müller, Dirk Schädler, Wolfgang A. Wall, Jonas Biehler, Tobias Becher
{"title":"Patient-specific prediction of regional lung mechanics in ARDS patients with physics-based models: A validation study","authors":"Maximilian Rixner, Maximilian Ludwig, Matthias Lindner, Inéz Frerichs, Armin Sablewski, Karl-Robert Wichmann, Max-Carl Wachter, Kei W. Müller, Dirk Schädler, Wolfgang A. Wall, Jonas Biehler, Tobias Becher","doi":"arxiv-2408.14607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The choice of lung protective ventilation settings for mechanical ventilation\nhas a considerable impact on patient outcome, yet identifying optimal\nventilatory settings for individual patients remains highly challenging due to\nthe inherent inter- and intra-patient pathophysiological variability. In this\nvalidation study, we demonstrate that physics-based computational lung models\ntailored to individual patients can resolve this variability, allowing us to\npredict the otherwise unknown local state of the pathologically affected lung\nduring mechanical ventilation. For seven ARDS patients undergoing invasive\nmechanical ventilation, physics-based, patient-specific lung models were\ncreated using chest CT scans and ventilatory data. By numerically resolving the\ninteraction of the pathological lung with the airway pressure and flow imparted\nby the ventilator, we predict the time-dependent and heterogeneous local state\nof the lung for each patient and compare it against the regional ventilation\nobtained from bedside monitoring using Electrical Impedance Tomography.\nExcellent agreement between numerical simulations and experimental data was\nobtained, with the model-predicted anteroposterior ventilation profile\nachieving a Pearson correlation of 96% with the clinical reference data. Even\nwhen considering the regional ventilation within the entire transverse chest\ncross-section and across the entire dynamic ventilation range, an average\ncorrelation of more than 81% and an average root mean square error of less than\n15% were achieved. The results of this first systematic validation study\ndemonstrate the ability of computational models to provide clinically relevant\ninformation and thereby open the door for a truly patient-specific choice of\nventilator settings on the basis of both individual anatomy and\npathophysiology.","PeriodicalId":501378,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Medical Physics","volume":"390 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.14607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The choice of lung protective ventilation settings for mechanical ventilation
has a considerable impact on patient outcome, yet identifying optimal
ventilatory settings for individual patients remains highly challenging due to
the inherent inter- and intra-patient pathophysiological variability. In this
validation study, we demonstrate that physics-based computational lung models
tailored to individual patients can resolve this variability, allowing us to
predict the otherwise unknown local state of the pathologically affected lung
during mechanical ventilation. For seven ARDS patients undergoing invasive
mechanical ventilation, physics-based, patient-specific lung models were
created using chest CT scans and ventilatory data. By numerically resolving the
interaction of the pathological lung with the airway pressure and flow imparted
by the ventilator, we predict the time-dependent and heterogeneous local state
of the lung for each patient and compare it against the regional ventilation
obtained from bedside monitoring using Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Excellent agreement between numerical simulations and experimental data was
obtained, with the model-predicted anteroposterior ventilation profile
achieving a Pearson correlation of 96% with the clinical reference data. Even
when considering the regional ventilation within the entire transverse chest
cross-section and across the entire dynamic ventilation range, an average
correlation of more than 81% and an average root mean square error of less than
15% were achieved. The results of this first systematic validation study
demonstrate the ability of computational models to provide clinically relevant
information and thereby open the door for a truly patient-specific choice of
ventilator settings on the basis of both individual anatomy and
pathophysiology.