AutOmatic floW planning for fetaL MRI (OWL)

Sara Neves Silva, Tomas Woodgate, Sarah McElroy, Michela Cleri, Kamilah St Clair, Jordina Aviles Verdera, Kelly Payette, Alena Uus, Lisa Story, David Lloyd, Mary A Rutherford, Joseph V Hajnal, Kuberan Pushparajah, Jana Hutter
{"title":"AutOmatic floW planning for fetaL MRI (OWL)","authors":"Sara Neves Silva, Tomas Woodgate, Sarah McElroy, Michela Cleri, Kamilah St Clair, Jordina Aviles Verdera, Kelly Payette, Alena Uus, Lisa Story, David Lloyd, Mary A Rutherford, Joseph V Hajnal, Kuberan Pushparajah, Jana Hutter","doi":"arxiv-2408.06326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two subsequent deep learning networks, one localizing the fetal chest and one\nidentifying a set of landmarks on a coronal whole-uterus balanced steady-state\nfree precession scan, were trained on 167 and 71 fetal datasets across field\nstrengths, acquisition parameters, and gestational ages and implemented in a\nreal-time setup. Next, a phase-contrast sequence was modified to use the\nidentified landmarks for planning. The OWL pipeline was evaluated\nretrospectively in 10 datasets and prospectively in 7 fetal subjects\n(gestational ages between 36+3 and 39+3 weeks). The prospective cases were\nadditionally manually planned to enable direct comparison both qualitatively,\nby scoring the planning quality, and quantitatively, by comparing the indexed\nflow measurements. OWL enabled real-time fully automatic planning of the 2D\nphase-contrast scans in all but one of the prospective participants. The fetal\nbody localization achieved an overall Dice score of 0.94+-0.05 and the cardiac\nlandmark detection accuracy was 5.77+-2.91 mm for the descending aorta,\n4.32+-2.44 mm for the spine, and 4.94+-3.82 mm for the umbilical vein. For the\nprospective cases, overall planning quality was 2.73/4 for the automated scans,\ncompared to 3.0/4 for manual planning, and the flow quantitative evaluation\nshowed a mean difference of -1.8% (range -14.2% to 14.9%) by comparing the\nindexed flow measurements obtained from gated automatic and manual\nacquisitions. Real-time automated planning of 2D phase-contrast MRI was\neffectively accomplished for 2 major vessels of the fetal vasculature. While\ndemonstrated here on 0.55T, the achieved method has wider implications, and\ntraining across multiple field strengths enables generalization. OWL thereby\npresents an important step towards extending access to this modality beyond\nspecialised centres.","PeriodicalId":501378,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Medical Physics","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.06326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two subsequent deep learning networks, one localizing the fetal chest and one identifying a set of landmarks on a coronal whole-uterus balanced steady-state free precession scan, were trained on 167 and 71 fetal datasets across field strengths, acquisition parameters, and gestational ages and implemented in a real-time setup. Next, a phase-contrast sequence was modified to use the identified landmarks for planning. The OWL pipeline was evaluated retrospectively in 10 datasets and prospectively in 7 fetal subjects (gestational ages between 36+3 and 39+3 weeks). The prospective cases were additionally manually planned to enable direct comparison both qualitatively, by scoring the planning quality, and quantitatively, by comparing the indexed flow measurements. OWL enabled real-time fully automatic planning of the 2D phase-contrast scans in all but one of the prospective participants. The fetal body localization achieved an overall Dice score of 0.94+-0.05 and the cardiac landmark detection accuracy was 5.77+-2.91 mm for the descending aorta, 4.32+-2.44 mm for the spine, and 4.94+-3.82 mm for the umbilical vein. For the prospective cases, overall planning quality was 2.73/4 for the automated scans, compared to 3.0/4 for manual planning, and the flow quantitative evaluation showed a mean difference of -1.8% (range -14.2% to 14.9%) by comparing the indexed flow measurements obtained from gated automatic and manual acquisitions. Real-time automated planning of 2D phase-contrast MRI was effectively accomplished for 2 major vessels of the fetal vasculature. While demonstrated here on 0.55T, the achieved method has wider implications, and training across multiple field strengths enables generalization. OWL thereby presents an important step towards extending access to this modality beyond specialised centres.
用于羊乳核磁共振成像(OWL)的自动浮动规划
随后的两个深度学习网络(一个定位胎儿胸部,另一个识别冠状全子宫平衡无稳态前驱扫描上的一组地标)在不同场强、采集参数和胎龄的167个和71个胎儿数据集上进行了训练,并在等时设置中实施。接下来,对相位对比序列进行了修改,以使用识别的地标进行规划。在 10 个数据集中对 OWL 管道进行了回顾性评估,并在 7 个胎儿受试者(胎龄在 36+3 到 39+3 周之间)中对其进行了前瞻性评估。对前瞻性病例进行了额外的人工计划,以便通过对计划质量进行评分和对指数化血流测量进行定量比较,从而进行直接比较。除一名前瞻性参与者外,OWL 均实现了二维相位对比扫描的实时全自动规划。胎体定位的总体 Dice 得分为 0.94+-0.05,降主动脉的心脏标记检测准确率为 5.77+-2.91 mm,脊柱为 4.32+-2.44 mm,脐静脉为 4.94+-3.82 mm。在前瞻性病例中,自动扫描的总体规划质量为 2.73/4,而人工规划为 3.0/4,通过比较选通自动采集和人工采集获得的指数化血流测量,血流定量评估显示平均差异为-1.8%(范围为-14.2% 到 14.9%)。二维相位对比核磁共振成像的实时自动规划已在胎儿血管的两根主要血管中有效完成。虽然在 0.55T 上进行了演示,但所实现的方法具有更广泛的意义,在多种场强下进行训练可实现通用化。因此,OWL 是将这种模式的使用范围扩大到专业中心以外的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信