Mapping scientific mobility in leading Eurozone economies: insights from ORCID data analysis

IF 3.5 3区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Alicia Moreno-Delgado, Marlon Cárdenas-Bonett, Óscar de Gregorio-Vicente, Julio Montero-Díaz
{"title":"Mapping scientific mobility in leading Eurozone economies: insights from ORCID data analysis","authors":"Alicia Moreno-Delgado, Marlon Cárdenas-Bonett, Óscar de Gregorio-Vicente, Julio Montero-Díaz","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05153-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research into the mobility of researchers has garnered increasing interest among institutions and governments. In this study, we use ORCID as a data source to analyse the mobility of researchers trained in Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands, and Italy, the main economies of the Eurozone according to Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Our approach focuses on the connection between the place of education and employment, identifying graduates and their countries of employment through profiles on ORCID. We conduct a comparative analysis of preferred destinations, considering various levels of education, and develop a migration rate for researchers from these countries. The results reveal a clear preference for the United States and Great Britain among graduates, influenced by linguistic affinities and historical cultural relations. Regarding the migration rate, we observe that all countries retain more graduates than those who emigrate. France leads in emigration, followed by the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, and Spain. This analysis of researcher mobility in the Eurozone allows us to track migratory flows, identifying both sending and receiving countries. These findings are essential for the formulation of scientific and migration policies and contribute to understanding individual behaviour in building academic and professional careers.</p>","PeriodicalId":21755,"journal":{"name":"Scientometrics","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientometrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05153-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research into the mobility of researchers has garnered increasing interest among institutions and governments. In this study, we use ORCID as a data source to analyse the mobility of researchers trained in Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands, and Italy, the main economies of the Eurozone according to Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Our approach focuses on the connection between the place of education and employment, identifying graduates and their countries of employment through profiles on ORCID. We conduct a comparative analysis of preferred destinations, considering various levels of education, and develop a migration rate for researchers from these countries. The results reveal a clear preference for the United States and Great Britain among graduates, influenced by linguistic affinities and historical cultural relations. Regarding the migration rate, we observe that all countries retain more graduates than those who emigrate. France leads in emigration, followed by the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, and Spain. This analysis of researcher mobility in the Eurozone allows us to track migratory flows, identifying both sending and receiving countries. These findings are essential for the formulation of scientific and migration policies and contribute to understanding individual behaviour in building academic and professional careers.

Abstract Image

绘制欧元区主要经济体的科学流动图:ORCID 数据分析的启示
机构和政府对研究人员流动性的研究越来越感兴趣。在本研究中,我们使用 ORCID 作为数据源,分析了在德国、法国、西班牙、荷兰和意大利(根据国内生产总值(GDP)计算的欧元区主要经济体)接受培训的研究人员的流动情况。我们的方法侧重于教育和就业地点之间的联系,通过 ORCID 上的资料识别毕业生及其就业国家。考虑到不同的教育水平,我们对首选目的地进行了比较分析,并得出了这些国家研究人员的移民率。结果显示,受语言亲和力和历史文化关系的影响,毕业生明显偏好美国和英国。关于移民率,我们发现所有国家留住的毕业生都多于移民的毕业生。法国的移民率最高,其次是荷兰、德国、意大利和西班牙。通过对欧元区研究人员流动性的分析,我们可以追踪移民流,确定输出国和接收国。这些发现对于制定科学和移民政策至关重要,并有助于理解个人在建立学术和职业生涯中的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientometrics
Scientometrics 管理科学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
351
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Scientometrics aims at publishing original studies, short communications, preliminary reports, review papers, letters to the editor and book reviews on scientometrics. The topics covered are results of research concerned with the quantitative features and characteristics of science. Emphasis is placed on investigations in which the development and mechanism of science are studied by means of (statistical) mathematical methods. The Journal also provides the reader with important up-to-date information about international meetings and events in scientometrics and related fields. Appropriate bibliographic compilations are published as a separate section. Due to its fully interdisciplinary character, Scientometrics is indispensable to research workers and research administrators throughout the world. It provides valuable assistance to librarians and documentalists in central scientific agencies, ministries, research institutes and laboratories. Scientometrics includes the Journal of Research Communication Studies. Consequently its aims and scope cover that of the latter, namely, to bring the results of research investigations together in one place, in such a form that they will be of use not only to the investigators themselves but also to the entrepreneurs and research workers who form the object of these studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信